SOC 2 Report Example – Detailed Section’s Breakdown

Cloud-hosted businesses today are cognizant of the profound impact security has on customer perception. Ensuring the security of customer data as well as maintaining vendor compliance is an important objective. SOC 2, in this context, is a globally-accepted way to secure data, build trust, and unlock growth opportunities.

But what exactly does a SOC 2 report contain? This article breaks down the key components of these essential documents and offers business owners a practical guide to understanding and leveraging SOC 2 reports.

What is a SOC 2 Report?

A SOC 2 report is a detailed description of your SOC 2 audit. It is an evaluation by an independent certified auditor of whether your business provides a secure, available, confidential, and private solution to your customers. The auditor releases the report after examining your organization’s control over one or more of the Trust Services Criteria (that you have chosen). 

The SOC 2 report contains the auditor’s detailed opinion on the design and operating effectiveness of your internal controls. It is, in essence, a testimony to the strength of your infosec practices. It is meant to enable the report users (your customers and customer’s customer) to assess and address the risks that arise from their relationship with your organization.

What does a SOC 2 report contain? 

A SOC 2 report is a comprehensive document that provides insight into an organization’s security controls and their effectiveness. Here’s what you should look for in each section:

1. Independent auditor’s report
   • Audit scope and timeframe
   • Auditor’s responsibilities
   • Management’s responsibilities
   • Limitations of the audit
   • Auditor’s opinion (e.g., unqualified, qualified, adverse, or disclaimer)
2. Management’s assertion
   • Overview of the system
   • Statement on the suitability of control design
   • Assertion of control effectiveness
3. System description
   • System boundaries and components
   • Infrastructure and software details
   • Personnel roles and responsibilities
   • Data flow and processing procedures
   • Relevant aspects of the control environment
4. Trust service criteria and related controls
   • Breakdown by criteria (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy)
   • Description of controls for each criterion
   • Explanation of how controls address the criteria
5. Tests of Controls
   • Control objectives
   • Description of controls
   • Test procedures performed
   • Results of testing
   • Any exceptions or deviations noted

When reviewing a SOC 2 report, pay close attention to the auditor’s opinion, any exceptions noted in the tests of controls, and how the organization plans to address any identified issues.

SOC 2 Report Example

The crux of the SOC 2 report lies in understanding whether a particular organization meets its audit criteria or not. The SOC report, therefore, provides detailed information about the audit, management perspectives, system description, tests of controls, and other relevant information. While all this can make the report quite intimidating, what with its reams of information in legal-speak, here’s a ready reckoner on the various sections of the report and what to look for in each of them.

A SOC 2 report example helps to evaluate whether your business provides a secure, confidential, and private solution to your customers.

Every SOC 2 report should have the 5 sections:

• Management Assertion
• Independent Service Auditor’s Report
• System Description
• Trust Services Criteria, controls, and test Results
• Other information

In most SOC 2 reports, you will find four sections and an optional fifth section.

Here’s a SOC 2 report example that showcases what each section includes:

Source: AICPA’s Illustrative Type 2 SOC 2 Report with the Criteria in the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM)

Sections of SOC 2 Report

The SOC 2 report is an information mine about the audited entity. It includes (but is not limited to) general information on the audited organization, the auditor’s opinion on the compliance assessment of the organization’s controls, and the description of the tests involved. The report also includes recommendations for improving security protocols when needed. 

Here’s a lowdown on each section and what it contains:

Section 1: Management Assertion

This section provides assertions, statements and facts as given by the audited organization and relates to their system(s) under audit. It’s written by the organization and is essentially the management acknowledging that the information provided is accurate and relevant. The section summarises the organization’s services, products, structures, systems and controls. It, however, doesn’t contain technical details. 

Here’s a gist of what this section contains:

1. Types of services provided
2. Components of systems – Infrastructure, System, People, Procedures and Data
3. Aspects of systems
4. How the systems capture and address significant events and conditions
5. Processes used to prepare and deliver reports
6. Any applicable Trust Service Criteria that are not being met by controls, with reasons as to why

Section 2: Independent Service Auditor’s Report

This section summarizes the auditor’s opinion on the organization’s controls in scope. It explains the assessment’s conclusion, along with the scope, responsibilities, and limitations considered during the review. It is, therefore, one of the most read and important sections of the report. 

In this section, the auditor shares their opinion on your SOC 2 audit readiness. It also includes a description of the scope of the audit, the organization’s responsibilities, the auditor’s responsibility and inherent limitations in the assessment, such as human error and circumvention of controls, to name a few. 

Here are the four types of auditor opinions and what they mean:   

• Unqualified – No material issues in the controls tested.
  An unqualified opinion is a clean opinion. It means the auditor concluded that the system description, control design, and, for Type 2 reports, control operation met the applicable criteria in all material respects. It does not always mean the report has zero exceptions. If exceptions are listed, review their scope, affected controls, and management response to decide whether they matter to your use case.
• Qualified – Close, but not quite.
  The auditor has some reservations as some areas require attention. But how bad is a qualified report? Well, it depends on the controls in question that failed and how they impact the report users.
• Adverse – One or more control areas materially did not meet the criteria.
  An adverse opinion indicates that the organization materially failed one or more of the standards, and its controls and system isn’t reliable.
• Disclaimer of Opinion – No comments!
  This technically isn’t an opinion. It essentially means that the information provided wasn’t enough for the auditor to form an opinion. It happens when the auditors do not have access to the information they need or are unable to complete it neutrally.

Note that this section gives the overall status of the assessment alone. You won’t find details beyond that here. 

Here’s a SOC 2 audit report example that highlights the auditor’s opinion.

Source: AICPA’s Illustrative Type 2 SOC 2 Report with the Criteria in the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM)

Section 3: System Description

If management assertion was a brief overview of the organization’s system description, this section is a detailed deep dive. It’s a must-read section and covers the system(s), scope & requirements, components, controls, sub-service organizations and other systems information. 

It includes details of the human resources, roles and responsibilities and also features the list of system components and controls grouped with the relevant common criteria.

This section covers a detailed account of the control environment, control activities (policies and procedures), information and communication system, monitoring (to assess the quality of internal control performance through penetration testing and vulnerability scans), and risk assessment (the organization’s assessment of relevant risks and its management).

Some of the items in the system description would be:

• Overview of services provided: It contains a brief overview of the services offered by the organization. Your customers will read here to ensure that the services they seek from you are covered in the compliance scope. You will also find service commitments and system requirements here.
• System components: You will find technical details such as where the organization (or its application) is hosted, tools used and access control here. For instance, if your business is hosted in AWS, you will need to give details about the AWS environment here. It will contain a detailed description of your infrastructure, software, people, procedures and data.
• Control activities: A detailed description of the various control activities of the organization can be found here. From how the organization onboards new employees to how it keeps data secure through database protection, encryption and access, this is your go-to section for how the organization has designed its controls.

Not applicable trust services criteria specifics: If any specific criteria didn’t apply to the organization, they would be described here.

Section 4: Applicable Trust Services Criteria and Related Controls, Tests of Controls, and Results of Tests

This section details all the tests (and their results) performed during the audit and therefore is a critical section in the report. It gives the insights that explain the auditor’s opinion detailed in section 2.

This section includes (in a tabulated format) the following:

• Control Criteria
• Control Number
• Control Description from the Organization
• Test Description from the Auditor
• Test Results

Source: AICPA’s Illustrative Type 2 SOC 2 Report with the Criteria in the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM)

Difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and SOC 2 Type 2 Report

While the first three sections of the report will be the same for both SOC 2 Type 1 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, this section would be significantly different. 

In a Type 1 report, this section will feature the list of all the controls tested during the audit. It won’t feature the auditor tests or the results of tests. This is because Type 1 assesses the design of the controls at a point in time. 

In a Type 2 report, you will find the controls list, auditor’s tests and the test results for each listed control. This section (for a Type 2 report) will also showcase exceptions or deviations noted by the auditor. 

Source: AICPA’s Information for Service Organization Management report

Section 5: Other information provided by the Management

This section is optional and details management’s response to any deviations or exceptions highlighted by the auditor in Section 4 by giving more context and information about the exceptions. For instance, if one of the exceptions noted by the auditor was that some of the new hires didn’t undergo background verification, the management can acknowledge the same here and cite reasons why and propose ways to ensure such misses don’t repeat. 

This section also contains information on the organization’s future plans that can have a bearing on its control environment and system(s).

Also review whether the report discloses significant incidents, subsequent events, or major system changes during the audit period. These may include changes to services, IT architecture, security personnel, legal or regulatory requirements, organizational structure, or subservice organization processes. A SOC 2 report does not need to describe every operational change, but it should provide users with enough context to understand changes that could affect the service commitments and system requirements covered by the audit.

Run SOC 2 with continuous, autonomous compliance

Preparing for SOC 2 doesn’t have to be a point-in-time scramble. With Sprinto, compliance runs continuously in the background so your audits and reports are always up to date.

Sprinto uses AI-driven automation and deep integrations to monitor controls in real time, collect and map evidence automatically, and flag risks before they turn into audit issues. Instead of chasing screenshots and reconciling gaps at the last minute, teams get a system that keeps their SOC 2 reports accurate, complete, and audit-ready throughout the year.

By bringing controls, evidence, and audit workflows into a single platform, Sprinto reduces manual effort while giving teams full visibility into their compliance posture making SOC 2 not just easier to achieve, but easier to maintain.