Thoropass Alternatives: Compare Competitor Features,  Pros, and Cons

Scanning through hundreds of reviews across software evaluation platforms is not the most feasible way to choose a tool. If you are looking for Thoropass alternatives, you probably went down that road, only to end up more confused than when you started.  

We tried to simplify this for you. We collected and analyzed hundreds of users’ reviews and sentiments across the web and put up the data in a digestible manner – so you can make an easy decision with minimum effort.  

What is Thoropass? 

Thoropass (previously Laika) is a compliance and audit solution that helps businesses implement, monitor, and manage security posture using a single platform. 

It offers a suite of in-house auditors and automates evidence collection to enable users to demonstrate compliance with multiple frameworks, including SOC 1, SOC 2, HITRUST, ISO, and PCI. 

Why choose Thoropass?

• Auditor-approved integrations and monitors collect only necessary data while triggering alerts on violations. 
• Knowledgeable and helpful in-house auditing consultancy helps to answer security questions and guide through the certification process
• The SOC 2 compliance processes were lauded in particular by customers. The platform offers all policies, tools, security controls, and project management capabilities for SOC 2 success. 
• The platform offers cost-effective solutions without compromising on quality. 
• Compliance related processes like employee training, responding to due diligence questionnaires, and tracking activities are managed efficiently. 

Why look for an alternative to Thoropass?

Thoropass is one of the leading companies in the compliance and security industry, with an impressive 4.7/5 rating from its users on G2. 

Despite the overwhelming positive feedback, a quick analysis of actual reviews by their clients highlights its limitations. We gathered the following drawbacks from the user sentiments:

• The platform’s dashboard is not designed thoughtfully. Users reported duplicate efforts to check off controls and had difficulties navigating between different sets of controls.
• The automation capabilities for evidence collection and reporting is limited according to some users.
• Does not allow users to upload additional information other than PDFs and images. 
• The pre-built integration options are limited. The integration process is buggy and clunky, according to some users. 

Top 5 alternatives to Thoropass

The five alternatives worth comparing are Sprinto, Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, and Hyperproof. Each fits a different priority: Sprinto for SaaS teams that want continuous, automated monitoring and audit readiness in weeks; Drata for teams that need deep control customization across multiple products; Vanta for an intuitive, well-established option when budget is less of a constraint; Secureframe for a more streamlined SOC 1 and SOC 2 process; and Hyperproof for IT and risk teams running many frameworks at once.

The breakdowns below show where each tool fits:

1. Sprinto

Sprinto is an autonomous compliance platform for SaaS companies. It integrates with cloud infrastructure to continuously and comprehensively monitor control measures and security risks by running fully automated checks.  

 The tool helps to visualize risk impact, quantify its impact, add custom risks, and set up a mitigation plan against each.  

It offers the tools and processes required for audit success by streamlining the audit lifecycle efficiently and precisely. Prepare for multiple framework audits, gather evidence, and coordinate reviews with stakeholders using an auditor-friendly dashboard.  

All features, capabilities, and feedback considered, Sprinto is the best alternative to Thoropass. 

Pros:

• The audit dashboard automatically collects system snapshots, collects evidence, and generates documentation to ensure audit readiness in weeks 
• Scan the controls for anomalies and notifies the assigned control owner to proactively take action using AI-based corrective action
• Integrates with common cloud, identity, HR, ticketing, and developer tools to ensure continuous compliance without re-architecting your stack
• The tool is designed thoughtfully to help users operate and organize activities from start to certification without disrupting engineering bandwidth using automated checks and workflows
• The control mapping feature eliminates duplicate effort and saves additional expenditure by common controls from existing frameworks, helping you scale faster
• Proactively detects gaps and vulnerabilities to build robust risk resilience. Leverage a comprehensive risk library quantify risk impact, add custom risks, and scope out risks
• Collects and documents evidence automatically and with high accuracy. The shared audit-friendly dashboard allows users to edit, upload, and view evidence.
• Set up compliance programs for specific monitoring periods by creating a separate audit window and monitoring controls for that defined period

Limitations:

• The tool is not suitable for on-premise companies
• Limited capabilities for governance related activities 

2. Drata

Drata monitors a company’s security posture and collects evidence of its security controls. It automates and streamlines compliance workflows to ensure audit readiness. 

The platform supports 12+ popular frameworks that enable users to build a compliance program using Drata’s control library. 

Use the deep customization capabilities to assign control owners, create custom controls, and use different compliance workspaces for different products. 

Pros:

• Control dashboard helps users easily manage and oversee control related issues. The monthly status report tracks annual audit readiness level. 
• The trust center eliminates slow and cumbersome processes that allow customers to easily download non-disclosure agreements for SOC 2
• Policy templates enable security teams to implement policies mapped to controls and create custom policies using the dashboard 
• The customer support team is highly responsive and offers proactive post-sales support 
• The audit hub directly connects to external auditors to streamline the review process

Limitations:

• Does not offer the desired level of insight and necessary content into passing or failing checks to allow users to take corrective action
• The custom framework feature has limited automation capability – users had to add checks and controls manually 
• The platform can be costly for some users, especially startups 

Also check: A Quick Comparison of Drata Alternatives

3. Vanta

Vanta helps companies obtain reports for security and privacy frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more. Vanta offers custom programs for startups, medium-sized, and enterprise companies and supports custom frameworks. 

It offers the tools and expertise needed to accelerate growth, efficiently manage compliance processes, and mitigate business risks to build trust with external stakeholders. 

Pros:

• The platform’s navigation flow is simple and intuitive, making it user-friendly and accessible
• Reduces audit anxiety and prepares users in a way to ensure audit success by providing the crucial tools, expertise, controls, policies, and risk registers
• The security and compliance scanning capabilities are mostly accurate and helpful for monitoring
• Vanta is one of the earliest drivers to the security and compliance automation industry, building up a good amount of expertise

Limitations:

• Cross-framework evidence reuse is supported, though the depth of mapping can vary by framework.
• Some users consider Vanta a premium-priced option, and total cost can rise with add-ons; pricing is custom-quoted, so compare scoped quotes against alternatives.
• Some reviewers note slower support response on lower-tier plans.

Check out: Vanta Alternatives: Compare Top Competitor Pricing, Pros, Cons, & Rating

4. Secureframe

Secureframe helps businesses achieve and manage compliance for frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, and NIST.

The platform connects with the cloud infrastructure to review risks and vulnerabilities, complete vendor due diligence, implement relevant policies, and stay compliant through continuous monitoring. 

Pros:

• Customers undergoing SOC 1 and 2 processes reported that the process felt more streamlined, organized, and manageable, saving time and manual effort
• Centralizes all compliance-related activities and requirements like tools, activities, controls, tests, and more in a single view to facilitate easy vendor collaboration
• The “tests” feature provides a helpful overview of policy health
• Breaks down complex compliance processes into manageable and easy to understand steps. Maps controls clearly defined tasks to manage compliance checks better

Limitations:

• The platform does not facilitate proactive risk mitigation as it lacks the capability to notify control owners about failing or due tasks
• Users suggested minor room for improvements in the UI, such as better search functionality and a buggy user account system that shows deactivated accounts
• The platform is not fully automated. Requires manual fine-tuning to align requirements with standards

Good Read: Secureframe Alternatives: Compare Top Competitor Pricing, Pros, Cons, & Rating

5. Hyperproof

Hyperproof is a security and compliance management software that helps IT teams oversee org-wide risks. The solution enables risk professionals to automate compliance activities, continuously scale by adding new frameworks, and boost team collaboration. 

Create use case-specific controls, reuse controls to save time and effort, and test control effectiveness. Assign remediation workflows, maintain a single source of truth for vendor risk impact, and connect controls to audit requirements. 

Pros:

• “Teams” functionality enables users to track control variations across frameworks while aligning them to the master control of the associated framework
• The live guided feature assists users through topics and prompts actions while completing tasks
• The control reuse feature helps users launch multiple frameworks without duplicating efforts
• Allows users to easily set up custom audits and programs, import control requirements in CSV format, and track compliance program progress

Limitations:

• The reporting and analytics function lack the desired level of customization and option to create visuals within the platform 
• Some features, like the role-based access control system, could be more intuitive. Users reported that assigning controls can be tricky and confusing

Also check: Hyperproof Alternatives: Compare Top 5 Competitors

What to check before switching from Thoropass

If you’re moving away from Thoropass, the platform is the easy part. What makes a switch smooth or painful is usually your auditor and your timing, not the tool. A cheaper or faster-looking option can still stall your audit if evidence, auditor access, or your observation period doesn’t transfer cleanly.

Before you switch, check:

1. Whether your current auditor will accept a mid-cycle change: Some audit firms test against a fixed control set and won’t allow you to change platforms or controls midway through an audit period; others are flexible as long as the underlying criteria are met. Confirm this first; it’s the biggest factor in how difficult your migration will be. Ask your prospective platform for its control list and take it to your auditor before you commit.
2. How your historical evidence will be trusted: You can export policies, evidence, and vendor records, but an auditor may not accept a self-exported spreadsheet as readily as evidence pulled directly from a platform. Ask how prior-period evidence will be preserved and who will hold it during the transition.
3. Controls won’t transfer one-to-one: Each platform defines its own controls, so plan to rebuild your program using the new platform’s control set rather than translate your old one. Policies and documents can usually be carried over; the control mapping cannot.
4. How the switch affects your current audit window: You generally have three options: keep your existing window and supply prior-period evidence from your old platform, reset the window and accept a short coverage gap, or start a fresh program. Each has a tradeoff, and customers may ask about any gap in your report.
5. Your existing contract term: Multi-year lock-ins are common, so check your renewal date early. If you’re mid-contract, a proof of concept timed to expire before the end of the contract lets you validate the new platform without paying twice.
6. Framework and integration support: Whether the alternative supports your current frameworks and planned add-ons (ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, HITRUST) and which integrations are native versus require manual uploads.

Use the switch to reduce manual work, not just to replace one dashboard with another. The best alternative should preserve your audit momentum while making evidence collection, control ownership, and renewal planning easier to manage.

Choose the alternative that keeps your audit on track

Sprinto helps teams organize controls, evidence, tasks, and audit workflows so they can move toward certification faster and with fewer manual follow-ups. The platform’s continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and workflow reminders reduce the manual effort needed to run and maintain compliance programs.

It offers ready-to-use, customizable security programs for 200+ frameworks, pre-built policy templates, ready-to-use training modules, real-time monitoring to ensure continued compliance, and fully automated evidence collection to ensure your success. 

Sprinto provides your team with expert support from setup through audit, so you know what to fix, what evidence to collect, and when to involve the auditor. Book a demo with us now.

FAQs