Top 8 OneTrust Alternatives: Compare Competitor Pros, Cons, & Features
Anwita
Oct 02, 2024Choosing a compliance tool can take you down a rabbit hole of options and marketing gimmicks. With each solution claiming to be the best out there, choosing the right one can be another daunting task in your compliance checklist, rather than being an enabler.
What if there was one resource that consolidated all the important data you need to make the right decision? Wouldn’t that make your choice easier? If you are looking for OneTrust alternatives, you have landed in the right place.
We did the hard work for you – we scanned through the feedback given by real users across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius in an easy to digest format so that you can move closer to the right decision.
TLDR
Some of the main OneTrust alternatives and competitors include Sprinto, Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, and Hyperproof The best alternative for OneTrust is Sprinto, surpassing OneTrust in capabilities like empirical risk assessment, control mapping, responsive integrations, customizations, and lower pricing. |
What is OneTrust?
OneTrust is a governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) and security assurance tool that helps organizations prioritize and manage risks to operate efficiently without uncertainty.
It streamlines and centralizes the policy management lifecycle using pre-built templates and real-time reporting.
The platform helps users implement security compliance requirements by automating evidence collection and streamlining external auditor collaboration.
Users can effectively manage third-party risks to track critical information by using an inventory and assess their vendors based on the control framework.
OneTrust pricing
OneTrust’s pricing structure depends on the modules and features selected. Factors like number of employees, primary area of operation, number of frameworks, and existing progress play a crucial role in the ultimate cost.
The package also factors into your expenses. For example, the Consent & Preference Essentials package starts at around $827/month for a single domain, while the GDPR Compliance package costs around $2,275/month.
Organizations might pay between $10,000 to $20,000 annually, depending on their needs. You can also negotiate volume discounts for bundles packages or opt for the annual payments module to reduce the overall cost.
Why choose OneTrust?
- Users appreciate how OneTrust connects policies to controls and evidence in an organized manner, eliminating the need for excel sheets or multiple tools
- The readiness project facilitates compartmentalized assessment based on the framework and org specific compliance requirements
- Users appreciate the tool’s capability to collaborate with auditors and map security questionnaires to controls and evidence
- Scans for cookies throughout the website and analyzes risk levels using the data mapping feature to simplify GDPR compliance
- Offers a centralized repository for data assets and leverages AI to discover and classify data
Why look for an alternative to OneTrust?
OneTrust has overwhelmingly positive feedback from its user base. It has helped numerous organizations operationalize their efforts across governance and compliance activities.
However, no tool is perfect. Scanning through G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius reviews, we gathered the following limitations of the tool.
Cons
- Users faced challenges with the UI and few of them were: confusing navigation, room for further improvement to make it more intuitive, and an inconsistent interface for different modules
- Linking policies to controls and mapping them to the readiness project requires manual intervention
- The module does not come backed with pre-configured workflows, leading to a relatively manual configuration process
Top OneTrust alternatives
Based on user reviews, core capabilities, and feature set, the top alternatives to OneTrust are Sprinto, Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, and Hyperproof. Let’s understand how each fares against OneTrust.
Sprinto
Sprinto is an end-to-end risk, compliance, and audit management tool for SaaS companies. It monitors the control environment to detect security anomalies to help IT teams proactively manage and ensure continuous compliance.
Its deeply customizable compliance modules and scalable architecture helps users to build and manage compliance programs without disrupting bandwidth.
Features and capabilities:
- Deep granularity provides a high definition picture of compliance by showing passing, failing, critical, due tasks along with the status of audit progress
- The tool comes pre-baked with the systems and tools required to implement and maintain a security program and complete audits to save time on collaboration and additional tools
- A pipeline of automated checks and remediation workflows tracks control health in real-time to eliminate manual effort
- Offers 160+ highly responsive integrations that pulls data accurately and effectively
- Build powerful resilience against risks by accurately detecting gaps and vulnerabilities.
- A comprehensive risk library helps to scope out risks, add custom risks, and assign impact scores
- Pre-configured common control mapping reuses controls from existing frameworks to eliminate duplicate effort and save time and money
- Automatically collects evidence with high accuracy and documents it in a shared auditor dashboard, and track progress – all from a single window.
Pros:
- Automates compliance processes, eliminating manual effort
- Seamlessly integrates with business systems like GSuite and AWS
- Simplifies the compliance journey for standards like SOC 2 and ISO27001
- Includes built-in features like policy management and security training
- Facilitates zero-touch audits and reliable evidence collection
Cons
- Not suitable for on-premise organizations
How Fyle became SOC2 Compliant in 3 Weeks
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that Sprinto better meets their business needs compared to OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance. When it comes to ongoing product support, they considered Sprinto the preferred choice. Additionally, for feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of Sprinto over OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance.
Drata
Drata is a security compliance monitoring and audit readiness tool. Organizations can use the platform to implement and manage frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, CCPA, and CCMC.
The solution integrates with your existing technology stack to automate evidence collection, manage multiple frameworks using the control library, and continuously monitor control status.
Drata features and capabilities:
- The trust center helps teams reduce the sales cycle by using documents like controls, policies, and reports to demonstrate trust. It streamlines vendor reviews using a transparent system that allows users to control share and access lists.
- Leverages AI to review security questionnaires using automated extraction and response generation. It consolidates security and compliance data into a single source of truth to eliminate the need for multiple systems.
- The Audit Hub offers a single platform that streamlines communication, reduces back and forths, facilitates document sharing, and automates the audit process.
- The compliance as a code solution helps to swiftly enforce controls and minimize security gaps by continuously monitoring the development lifecycle. Auto generates pull requests to contextualize controls, pinpoint issues, and suggest patches.
- Infosec teams can use the risk management system to build a risk register using a pre-built library, automate control and test mapping, and develop treatment plans.
Pros
- Users can directly access a range of auditors to review evidence without multiple back-and-forths effectively
- The support team proactively helps users resolve issues and answer questions quickly
- Offers a comprehensive knowledge base of valuable resources that aids in providing essential guidance and training
- The trust center is a useful tool that automates processes like accepting non-disclosure agreements and downloading SOC 2 reports
- The controls compliance dashboard enables users to proactively manage and oversee issues, troubleshoot action items, and streamline workflows
Limitations
- The reporting functionality is not intuitive – users have to delete old evidence to upload new ones manually
- Mapping remediation to controls is not fully automated and requires manual intervention
- The policy management capabilities could be enhanced. Currently, it lacks advanced features to customize and update policies
- The overall solution is not cost-effective, especially for startups and small companies. Users reported the lack of transparency about add-on features that stretch their budget
Also, check: A Quick Comparison of Drata Alternatives
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that Drata better meets their business needs compared to OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance. In terms of ongoing product support, they preferred Drata as the preferred choice. Additionally, for feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of Drata over OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance.
Vanta
Vanta connects to existing tools to scan and monitor critical cloud assets to ensure continuous security compliance. It offers a single view to centralize access reviews, track audit progress for multiple standards, and address risks in their early stages.
The tool offers best practices and recommendations to improve security posture, provides helpful context around third-party risks, and alerts teams on issues for quick resolution.
Vanta features and capabilities:
- Detects and remediates risks in real-time by running tests by continuously monitoring to show failing and passing issues
- Dedicated support and account managers help users succeed with useful advice and guidance. Proactively responds to feedback and improves the tool.
- Pre-built and custom controls across frameworks offer faster and more consistent compliance
- Helps with audit preparedness by reducing manual activities around it and offering resources, tools, and policies to maintain compliance.
- A centralized dashboard provides insights and updates on IT assets and allows users to implement risk management policies
Pros
- Significantly reduces manual tasks by automating workflows. Simplifies and streamlines complex compliance processes
- The simple and intuitive layout of the platform makes it user-friendly and facilitates easy navigation
- Provides the necessary tools, guidance, controls, and risk registrars needed for audit success, thereby reducing audit anxiety
- One of the earliest drivers to the compliance and security market, making their level of expertise valuable and reliable
Limitations
- Some users reported that the platform lacks modularity as transferring SOC 2 related work to other programs is not easy
- The pricing module is higher compared to their competitors, making the platform not friendly for startups or small businesses
- The post-sales support is unsatisfactory, with users highlighting concerns about miscommunications about contract renewal and changing points of support
Also check: Vanta Alternatives: Compare Top Competitor Pricing, Pros, Cons, & Rating
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that Vanta better meets their business needs compared to OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance. Regarding ongoing product support, they considered Vanta the preferred choice. Additionally, for feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of Vanta over OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance.
Secureframe
Secureframe monitors your business’s cloud infrastructure to scan for security risks and vulnerabilities and automates control testing by continuously configuring collected data.
It helps to conduct vendor risk assessments, implement policies, and continuously monitor controls to ensure continuous compliance.
Secureframe features and capabilities:
- It analyzes suspicious behavior to provide valuable insights into security protocols and authentication.
- Stores sensitive data on-premise or in an adjacent cloud environment to reduce the risk of data loss at rest.
- Identifies risks by source and classifies them based on severity or custom values
- Tracks, collects, and consolidates data from passing and failing checks, assisting IT teams in meeting compliance requirements.
- Helps infosec teams score suppliers by estimating the level of risk in partnerships.
- Offers a library of pre-built plan and procedure templates, allowing users to create or compare these plans easily.
Pros
- Streamlines, organizes, and manages SOC 1 and 2 activities by providing all necessary tools and guidance required for success
- Organizes all compliance items, tools, policies, and more in a single view to facilitate easy review by auditors
- Offers a “tests” functionality that provides a general and useful overview of the health of the policies
- Simplifies complex compliance processes by breaking them into easy to understand and simplifies tasks. The control mapping feature makes compliance checks more organized
Limitations
- Does not support periodic or ad hoc notifications for failing or risky tests to control owners
- Minor issues with the UI, such as the reappearance of deactivated accounts and unsatisfactory results in the search functionality
- The lack of adequate integrations makes evidence collection and submission a relatively manual task
Check out: Secureframe Alternatives: Pricing, Pros, Cons, & Rating
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that Secureframe better meets their business needs compared to OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance. Regarding the quality of ongoing product support, they considered Secureframe the preferred choice. Additionally, when evaluating feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of Secureframe over OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance.
Hyperproof
Hyperproof is a centralized compliance and risk management platform that enables teams to automate workflows, mitigate security risks, and prepare for audits.
Manage and map multiple control frameworks, evaluate risks using custom scales, and track risk posture changes in real-time. Assess vendor risk profile using a single source of truth, connect audit requests to controls, collaborate with auditors, and track your audit status.
Hyperproof features and capabilities:
- The control reuse feature helps users quickly launch new frameworks with minimal effort
- The robust centralized platform enables users manage controls with ease, evaluate security and compliance risks, collect evidence on autopilot, and create a custom view of compliance progress
- Enables businesses and clients to implement, maintain, and manage their specific controls and functions by tracking progress and automating remediation workflows
- Enables users to set up custom compliance auditing programs, collect evidence on autopilot, and link them to controls
Pros
- Users can easily set up custom audit projects or compliance programs, import control requirements from the dashboard, and track the progress of compliance programs in real time
- The “teams” functions facilitate tracking control variations across frameworks while aligning them to master control of the associated framework
- Offers a live guides feature that prompts recommended actions to complete pending tasks and assist them, in understanding topics better
- Users can launch duplicate frameworks without duplicating their work using the control rework feature
Limitations
- Users have expressed a desire for more customization options for analytics and reporting system
- The role-based access control system is not intuitive, and assigning controls can be tricky
Good Read: Hyperproof Alternatives: Compare Top 5 Competitors
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance better meets their business needs compared to Hyperproof. However, when it comes to the quality of ongoing product support, they preferred Hyperproof. For feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers also favored the direction of Hyperproof over OneTrust.
LogicGate
LogicGate is a no code GRC platform that automates regulatory activities to help risk and compliance teams develop and strategize programs aligned with their evolving business needs.
LogicGate’s no code, integrated platform offers purpose built solutions like AI powered governance, cyber risk management, third party risk management, controls compliance, policy management, and data privacy.
Features and capabilities:
- Automates compliance workflows and duplicate evidence collection requests using a single risk plattform. Teams can analyze audit findings, build a security first risk program, and collect evidence for 25+ frameworks.
- Tests controls for gaps and redundant requirements, identifies common control requirements across frameworks to satisfy multiple frameworks, and creates a single source of truth to help IT teams visualize risks.
- Communicate risk to stakeholders in a common language using traditional quantification techniques. Contextualize risks from a financial perspective to enhance risk decisions.
- Optimize regulatory compliance management by identifying relevant legal regulations, prodigy regulatory alerts in real time, and keep up with changing regulations.
Pros:
- Users appreciate the flexibility in customizing workflows and processes to fit specific business and regulatory needs.
- The platform’s powerful reporting tools help businesses gain insights and manage risks efficiently.
- Users praise the responsive and helpful customer support team, highlighting their dedication to customer success and feedback.
- Implementation is straightforward and the support team helps to ensure a smooth process.
Cons:
- Some users find the interface could be more user-friendly, requiring some time to become familiar with the system.
- mentions of certain reporting features needing improvement, though the company is responsive to feedback.
- As a SaaS platform, balancing features for all customers can sometimes lead to misalignment with individual business goals.
- There are mentions of certain reporting features needing improvement, though the company is responsive to feedback.
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that OneTrust better meets their business needs compared to LogicGate Risk Cloud. However, when it comes to ongoing product support, they preferred LogicGate Risk Cloud. Additionally, for feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of LogicGate Risk Cloud over OneTrust.
Thoropass
Thoropass offers all tools and services required to manage multiple security compliance and audits, collect evidence, and oversee certification activities. It offers a single platform to run audits for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, PCI DSS, and more.
Features and capabilities:
- Combines in house expertise and automaton capabilities launch unique compliance projects, automate workflows, and accelerate sales lifecycle.
- Simplifies policy creation and acknowledgement, tracks and remediates risks through continuous monitoring, and standersizes processes using integrated project management.
- Seamlessly integrates with systems to automate the evidence collection process. In house auditors help to avoid complexities involved with third party auditors.
Pros:
- Users appreciate the easy-to-use task-based interface, which simplifies compliance management.
- Seamless integration with cloud services like Azure, AWS, and Google is highly praised for simplifying compliance across multiple platforms
- The customer service is well-regarded, with users mentioning helpful and responsive support teams.
- Automatic compliance checks and monitoring are standout features, making it easier to maintain SOC 2 and other certifications.
Cons:
- Some users mention a learning curve, especially for those new to compliance software.
- A few users pointed out minor usability issues, like needing to click twice in some interfaces.
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that Thoropass better meets their business needs compared to OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance. In terms of ongoing product support, they preferred Thoropass as the preferred choice. Additionally, for feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of Thoropass over OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance.
AuditBoard
AuditBoard is a risk management platform that offers a single solution to help teams use risk as a strategic lever. The platform consolidates risks, controls, policies, compliance frameworks, and issues to automate workflows, and streamline processes.
Features and capabilities:
- Helps to visualize auditable entities, helps to perform risk assessment, tracks key metrics, and enables teams to access risk insights from a single console.
- Quickly generates reports, identifies issues in testing, assigns actions plan owners, and tracks progress in real time to streamline findings management.
- Saves time and ensures consistency by templatizing audits, simplifying testing, remediation issues, and completing audits on time.
- Automates emails for audit surveys, email requests, and reminders. Centralizes audit communications from an easily accessible console and leaves a comprehensive audit trail.
- Leverage real-time insights to make data-driven decisions on risks, resources, audit outcomes, and more.
Pros:
- Navigation is easy and there are fewer technical issues compared to other programs. Users claim that the platform is organized and easy to use.
- The tool allows for efficient workflow creation, improving audit efficiency.
- It serves as a central repository for audit evidence and controls, reducing reliance on spreadsheets and documents.
- Users praise the customer support for being responsive and helpful.
- Provides customizable templates and workflows for streamlined audits and reviews
Cons:
- Some users report difficulties with mass uploading controls and maintaining updates in the system.
- There are concerns about specific features like user access reviews and policy attestation which require additional solutions.
- Smaller organizations might find it complex and resource-intensive to implement.
- Transitioning from other tools can require significant manual effort to populate data.
- Users have difficulty creating sub workflows based on answers in project tasks.
Overall user sentiment analysis based on G2 feedback: Reviewers found that OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance better meets their business needs compared to AuditBoard. When it comes to the quality of ongoing product support, they considered OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance the preferred choice. However, for feature updates and roadmaps, reviewers favored the direction of AuditBoard over OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance.
Supercharge compliance management with smart automation
Still trying to figure it out? We get you. But before you leave, hear us out.
As a smart automation tool, Sprinto does the heavy lifting for you. How, you ask? It continuously monitors your cloud environment to detect anomalies in your cloud posture to trigger remediations with speed and accuracy.
Sprinto’s risk intelligence module scores risks based on industry benchmarks to help you prioritize better and manage systematically. Add custom risks with their impact scores and get detailed insight into its level of criticality using a centralized risk management tool. Build, manage, and maintain security risks and automate compliance with sprinto to scale at an unprecedented rate. Talk to our experts to know how we can help your business.
Good Read: Hyperproof Alternatives: Compare Top 5 Competitors
FAQs
What type of tool is OneTrust?
OneTrust is a governance, risk, and compliance management tool that helps companies demonstrate trust to customers, measure and manage security risks, and visualize data in a way that helps to manage compliance.
Who are OneTrust competitors?
OneTrust is a popular tool that helps to manage security risks. However, it has a few limitations. If you are looking for a OneTrust alternative security compliance automation space, consider Sprinto, Hyperproof, Secureframe, or Vanta.
What is the pricing module of OneTrust?
OneTrust offers a flexible pricing module that depends on the size of your organization and framework scope. For example, a company with 500+ employees and multiple frameworks will spend at least 10 times more than a startup with 20 employees and a single framework.