ISO 27001 Secure Development Policy: A Practical Guide for SMBs

If you’re pushing code to production every week and juggling compliance at the same time, the idea of a “Secure Development Policy” might sound like bureaucratic red tape. But if you’re aiming for ISO 27001 certification, it’s non-negotiable. Auditors expect not just secure code, but proof that your development practices are standardized, enforced, and continuously monitored.

For fast-moving SMBs, that’s a tall order. With lean teams, evolving processes, and high delivery pressure, secure development often falls into the “we do it, but it’s not documented” trap. In this guide, we’ll show you how to turn that vulnerability into an advantage by building a secure development policy that’s lightweight, audit-ready, and built to scale with your team.

What is an ISO 27001 secure development policy?

An ISO 27001 Secure Development Policy is a formal set of guidelines that ensures security is embedded throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC). It aligns with Annex A.14.2 of the ISO 27001 standard and outlines how organizations enforce secure coding practices, code reviews, environment segregation, access controls, and vulnerability testing to protect data confidentiality, integrity, and availability from the ground up.

This policy goes beyond documentation—it operationalizes security as a core development discipline. By standardizing secure engineering principles, it reduces risk exposure, accelerates audit readiness, and enables consistent compliance with ISO 27001.

Why secure development is critical for ISO 27001 compliance

You can’t separate product development from security. ISO 27001 mandates secure development controls to limit risk exposure, prevent breaches, and ensure audit readiness. For SMBs, skipping this step can create blockers during certification and introduce systemic vulnerabilities post-certification.

1. Hardcoded credentials are time bombs

Credentials embedded in code are easily exposed in repos or deployments. Without automated scanning and peer review, they become persistent backdoors violating ISO controls and increasing breach risk.

2. Unvetted open-source code is a compliance risk

Third-party libraries may carry hidden vulnerabilities or outdated packages. ISO 27001 expects vetting and ongoing monitoring of dependencies—without it, your supply chain becomes your weakest link.

3. Uncontrolled code changes break audit trails

ISO demands clear change management. When code is pushed without documented approvals or versioning, traceability collapses, putting both security and certification at risk.

4. Lack of input validation invites exploits

Unchecked user input is a gateway to injection attacks and data leaks. ISO expects secure coding practices that prevent these issues before release—not band-aid fixes after incidents.

ISO 27001 control requirements for secure development

Annex A.14.2 of ISO 27001 outlines the controls required to ensure security is integrated throughout the system development lifecycle. Each clause reinforces the need for formalized, verifiable security processes and not just secure code.

A.14.2.1: Secure development policy

You must define and document how security is enforced during software development. This includes coding practices, security testing, approval workflows, and adherence across internal and outsourced teams.

A.14.2.2: System change control procedures

All changes to applications and systems must follow a documented and controlled process. That means change logs, impact assessments, and authorization trails are mandatory and not optional.

A.14.2.3: Technical review after platform changes

Any changes to the underlying infrastructure (e.g., OS updates, runtime upgrades) must trigger a technical review to reassess system behavior and ensure continued security alignment.

A.14.2.4: Restrictions on changes to software packages

You need to limit and document modifications to third-party or commercial software. Unauthorized patches or tweaks to these packages can introduce compliance gaps or licensing issues.

A.14.2.5: Secure system engineering principles

ISO expects you to apply industry-standard security principles such as least privilege, defense in depth, and secure defaults throughout the architecture and engineering phases.

A.14.2.6: Secure development environment

Developers should work in controlled environments—segregated from production, access-restricted, and pre-configured for security. This prevents code leaks and internal threats.

A.14.2.7: Outsourced development

If you outsource development, you’re still accountable. ISO requires that third-party teams follow your secure development policy, with contractual clauses and periodic audits.

A.14.2.8: System security testing

Security testing isn’t just for QA, it’s a core compliance requirement. This includes static/dynamic analysis, vulnerability scans, and remediation workflows that are repeatable and logged.

A.14.2.9: System acceptance testing

Before releasing to production, systems must undergo formal acceptance testing that includes security validations. This ensures controls are not only implemented but effective.

Key components of a secure development policy

A strong Secure Development Policy (ISO 27001-compliant) is a strategic document that hardwires security into your engineering culture. 

Here’s what an auditor-grade policy should cover:

1. Scope and objective

Clearly define which systems, teams (internal and outsourced), environments, and SDLC phases the policy applies to. This avoids ambiguity and ensures consistent enforcement across the board.

2. Secure coding standards

Adopt and mandate use of recognized coding standards like OWASP Top 10, SEI CERT, or language-specific security guidelines. Make them part of your code review and training process.

3. Version control

Specify how code repositories must be used (e.g., Git branching strategy, tagging, access restrictions). This ensures auditability, change traceability, and rollback capability.

4. Peer reviews

Mandate peer reviews for all production code. Define approval requirements, review scope (including security checks), and enforce through tools like GitHub/GitLab rules.

5. Security testing

Include requirements for static code analysis (SAST), dynamic testing (DAST), dependency scanning, and optionally fuzz testing. Integrate into CI/CD where possible for automation.

6. Environment segregation

Define strict separation between dev, staging, and production environments. Access to prod should be limited and monitored, with infrastructure-as-code preferred for consistency.

7. Change management

Outline procedures for documenting, reviewing, and approving all changes to systems and code. This includes emergency changes, rollback plans, and audit logging.

8. Third-party components

Establish a process for vetting open-source or commercial libraries. This includes security, license compliance, and version control. Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools.

9. Incident handling

Define what constitutes a development-related incident (e.g., a critical bug in auth logic), how it’s reported, triaged, and resolved. Include rollback and communication plans.

ISO 27001 Secure development roles and responsibilities

A policy is only as strong as the people enforcing it. ISO 27001 expects clear ownership over secure development tasks, ensuring security is operationalized and not just documented.

Engineering managers

Own day-to-day policy execution. They ensure secure development standards are embedded into sprints, code reviews, and delivery pipelines without slowing down velocity.

DevSecOps leads

Implement automated security gates—SAST, DAST, dependency scans—directly into CI/CD. They maintain real-time visibility into code health and compliance status.

Developers

Follow secure coding standards, complete required training, and participate in peer reviews. They’re the first line of defense against insecure code.

Compliance officers

Translate ISO 27001 requirements into enforceable controls. They collect evidence, perform internal checks, and ensure that SDLC gaps don’t hamper audits.

ISO 27001 secure development policy example/template

A well-defined Secure Development Policy should offer precise, actionable direction to developers and reviewers. Below is a more detailed example aligned with Annex A.14.2 requirements:

Section: Code review and approval process

Purpose:
Ensure that all code changes are secure, reviewed, and approved prior to deployment.

Scope:
Applies to all application and infrastructure code written, modified, or maintained by the organization.

Policy Requirements

1. Mandatory peer review:
   All code must be reviewed by at least one qualified team member who is not the author. Reviews must be completed before any code is merged into production or protected branches.
2. Security-focused review criteria:
   During security-focused reviews, developers should evaluate code for common vulnerabilities and adherence to best practices. This includes checking input and output validation, ensuring proper authentication and access controls, avoiding hardcoded credentials or secrets, identifying the use of insecure libraries or functions, and confirming compliance with the OWASP Top 10 and internal secure coding standards.
3. Documentation and traceability:
   All review comments, approvals, and change justifications must be documented within the pull request or change management system. Each commit must be linked to a corresponding ticket or issue for audit traceability.
4. Automated enforcement:
   Code repositories must enforce protection rules to prevent direct commits to production. Tools should be configured to reject merges without approved peer review.
5. Training and competency:
   All developers and reviewers must undergo annual secure coding and review process training. Completion must be tracked and verifiable.
6. Exception handling:
   Emergency changes bypassing the full review process must be documented, approved by Engineering and Security leads, and reviewed retroactively within 48 hours.

Common challenges SMBs face

While the principles of secure development are clear, execution is often where SMBs stumble, especially under the pressure of fast releases, limited headcount, and minimal security resources. 

Below are the most common pitfalls that derail ISO 27001 readiness and slow down audit timelines.

1. No dedicated security team

In lean teams, developers double as security owners, resulting in fragmented responsibilities and reactive decision-making. Without clear ownership, secure development often slips through the cracks or becomes a “nice-to-have.”

2. Ad hoc or tribal processes

SMBs often rely on undocumented tribal knowledge “we usually review code” or “we test for this before release.” But ISO 27001 demands documented, enforceable, and repeatable processes. Without that, you’re non-compliant even if you’re doing the right thing.

3. Lack of integrated tooling

Security tools not embedded in CI/CD pipelines lead to missed vulnerabilities and late-stage rework. If scanning and enforcement aren’t automated, security depends on individual vigilance rather than systemic control.

4. Manual, painful evidence collection

Auditors need proof and not intent. Without centralized, automated tracking of code reviews, approvals, and testing, teams scramble to piece together evidence retroactively, slowing down audits and introducing errors.

Automate secure development and compliance with Sprinto

Achieving ISO 27001 compliance demands more than documentation, it requires systems that prove security is real, enforced, and continuous. A Secure Development Policy, if treated as a one-time task, quickly collapses under the weight of code velocity, dev sprawl, and audit complexity.

The real challenge isn’t creating policy, it’s operationalizing it. Without embedded controls, traceable reviews, and real-time oversight, compliance gaps aren’t just possible, they’re inevitable. That’s why forward-thinking teams are shifting away from static checklists to dynamic, integrated approaches that make secure development automatic, auditable, and scalable by design.

Sprinto makes this possible by turning secure development into a real-time, continuously monitored system.

Here’s how:

Integrated with your SDLC stack

Connects directly with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket to enforce code review rules, branch protection, and merge restrictions—ensuring your policies aren’t just written but applied in practice.

Automated evidence collection

Captures and logs proof of peer reviews, approvals, change controls, and developer acknowledgments—mapped automatically to ISO 27001 controls, ready for auditor review.

Real-time compliance monitoring

Continuously tracks both manual and automated development activities, flagging policy violations or compliance drift before they cause audit issues.

Pre-built auditor dashboard

Presents all collected evidence in a clean, auditor-approved console—cutting down back-and-forth and accelerating certification timelines.

300+ native integrations

Taps into your cloud infra, CI/CD pipeline, HRMS, asset management, and ticketing systems to provide unified compliance visibility across your tech stack.

Customizable, scalable automation

Supports programmable checks and rule-based workflows tailored to your team’s development process—whether you’re two devs or two hundred.

Massive reduction in audit prep

Reduces manual effort by up to 80% and ensures you’re always audit-ready—so your engineering team can stay focused on shipping, not spreadsheets.

Ready to Maintain ISO 27001 compliance without slowing down your dev velocity? Speak to our experts today.

FAQs