Hyperproof Alternatives: Compare Top 5 Competitors

Choosing the right solution for your business, in a way, is like Schrodinger’s cat. Unless you start using the tool, it could be the best choice or a complete disaster. Either way, you must do your due diligence – many Hyperproof alternatives make big claims. The proof, however, is in the pudding.

So, we did some digging to help you understand the capabilities of Hyperproof competitors. This article compiles the pros and cons – and helps you move closer to a decision.

What does Hyperproof do?

Hyperproof helps security, risk, and compliance teams to operationalize compliance and risk activities, prepare for audits, and mitigate risks using automation.

Users can create custom controls and assign task owners to keep them updated. They can meet multiple standard requirements by reusing controls, automating evidence collection using 70+ integrations, managing risks through workflow remediation, and monitoring controls to address failing tests.

What is Hyperproof’s pricing structure?

Hyperproof’s pricing module starts approximately from $16,300 to $32,200 for a company of 200 employees. For larger organizations of around 1000 employees, the cost can go up to $49,300 and $99,700 for a headcount exceeding 1,001. This price is not fixed and can be customized based on a combination of multiple factors like the complexity and specificity of your business. For security and compliance automation tools like Hyperproof, the price  usually varies depending on certain factors such as:

1. Number of employees
2. Location of operation
3. Number of frameworks selected
4. Existing processes and tools
5. Contract term duration

Why look for a Hyperproof alternative?

Hyperproof is a trusted tool in the compliance space, with user sentiment leaning heavily on the positive note. However, a quick analysis of G2 reviews surfaces common issues:

• The tool is buggy and unresponsive at times, affecting the overall usability (updating fields, drop-down feature, and vendor management to name a few)
• The role assignment feature for different tasks is non-intuitive and takes time to load
• It does not automate the reporting function and offer enough flexibility to customize it to specific requirements
• The custom framework requirement editor is not intuitive and time-consuming
• A limited number of integrations—does not support smaller applications and systems, creating the need for manual intervention

Top 5 Hyperproof Alternatives

We gathered the top competitors of Hyperproof based on user reviews, features, capabilities, and more:

Sprinto

Sprinto is a compliance automation platform purpose-built for cloud companies. It supports 15+ compliance frameworks along with custom ones. It continuously monitors cloud environments to collect evidence.

The platform automates end-to-end workflows to ensure audit readiness in weeks without bleeding into people’s bandwidth. Users can view compliance status in real-time and proactively take action on failing checks from a single interface.

Pros

Supports integration for 100+ applications and tools

Easily set up custom role-based tasks. Flags and notifies non-compliant issues to relevant users with details of risk type and recommended actions 

Maps common controls across multiple frameworks by adding controls on your baseline implementation. Build and manage multiple frameworks with minimum effort to eliminate duplicate tasks and quickly scale

Access a suite of pre-built, customizable, and ready to launch policies using editable templates. Sprinto automatically creates a log of all policies to ensure audit readiness. 

Helps to create, launch, and manage custom frameworks easily. The magic mapping function accurately and automatically maps checks to the custom framework. 

The auditor-friendly dashboard allows users to collect, view, and edit evidence from a single dashboard. Collect in-app acknowledgement and pass audits with ease. Manage multiple audits by setting different windows for each and monitoring progress 

Profiles and prioritizes risks through a tiered escalation process that allows teams to manage issues before they translate to an auditor remark.

Offers an expert-guided program for startups to kickstart their compliance journey on a budget

Cons

• Continuous updates pushed to the tool may make some minor features unfamiliar to existing users
• On-premise companies may not find the tool suitable as it is purpose-built for cloud-hosted companies

Want to know how much will getting a complaint cost you? Estimate your costs using the Sprinto Compliance Calculator.

Sprinto VS Hyperproof

Hyperproof is praised by their customers for its robust capabilities to simplify compliance processes. However, the tool does not offer adequate native integrations, requiring users to manually set up integrations, configure controls, and automate checks. Sprinto solves this gap using responsive integrations that aggregate controls in a better and reliable way. The custom API helps to automate tasks which normally require manual intervention. 

Hyperproof’s dashboard can be configured to get an overview of your compliance and risk status, but it represents a low definition image of your security programs. This leaves users with a limited level of granularity into details like control level data and the inability to mark edge cases. Compared to this, Sprinto shows a high definition picture of compliance programs by connecting the dots better across assets, risks, and controls without missing links.

A quick comparison of these tools shows that Sprinto has better feedback for most use cases like compliance monitoring, auditing, policy enforcement, data governance, workflow management. 

	Hyperproof	Sprinto
User-friendliness	9.1/10	9.2/10
Support	9.3/10	9.2/10
Policy enforcement	8.3/10	9.3/10
Compliance monitoring	9.2/10	9.5/10
Auditing	8.6/10	9.4/10
Data governance	8.9/10	9.3/10
Workflow management	8.6/10	9.2/10

Drata

Drata automates end-to-end security and compliance activities to meet auditing requirements for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, NIST, CCPA, and more.

Their startup program helps compliance newbies quickly scale and operationalize existing systems. Drata’s trust center helps to accelerate the sales process by establishing trust with potential clients and streamlines vendor security reviews using self-serve questionnaires.

Pros:

• The audit hub helps users get rid of the drudgery associated with slow and monotonous auditing processes
• Streamlines compliance activities through real-time visibility into status and helps teams address goals
• Offers a wide range of integrations for various systems that function seamlessly to enable automated compliance reviews
• The controls compliance dashboard provides real-time visibility into issues and helps to stay on top of control-related issues
• The customer support team and product development are highly responsive and quickly resolve issues

Cons:

• Some users reported that certain features and capabilities were missing from the product
• The report/audit/documentation hub does not allow users to upload new documents without deleting the expired ones
• The policy management system does not offer sufficient customization capability
• Mapping remediation to controls is a manual process rather than an automated one

Must check: Sprinto Vs Drata: Compare Key Differences & Features in 2025

Drata VS Hyperproof

Drata offers better quality of support, compliance monitoring capabilities, data loss prevention, and has a better alerting system. Hyperproof offers better workflow management, risk scoring, and is the preferred choice for mid-market customers. 

	Hyperproof	Drata
User-friendliness	8.9/10	9.4/10
Support	9.6/10	9.8/10
Compliance monitoring	9.2/10	9.5/10
Data governance	8.2/10	8.8/10
Workflow management	8.6/10	8.5/10

Vanta

Vanta automates a significant chunk of activities for security and privacy framework. It helps businesses quickly close sales deals using compliance attestations.

It enables users to gain deep risk visibility to ensure continuous compliance, provides content and recommendations into risks, and prioritizes and resolves issues with real-time monitoring.

Pros

• Streamlines compliance process by automating tasks, offering guidance, and helping to maintain continuous security posture
• The UI is simple and intuitive, making the tool accessible to users and creating a seamless experience
• The overall solution is comprehensive and reliable to manage security and compliance
• Offers actionable insights into security posture to contribute to continued growth

Cons

• Lack of modularity makes it challenging to transfer SOC 2 data
• The pricing module is not small business-friendly
• Despite offering a vast range of options for integration, the system is often challenging and confusing for users
• The support provided by the customer success team needs to be more satisfactory. Users reported poor contact, miscommunication, and unkept promises

Must check: Sprinto Vs. Vanta: Compare all Features & Differences in 2025

Vanta VS Hyperproof

While both the solutions are a solid choice for compliance and auditing, Hyperproof takes the win for quality of support, audit management and risk scoring. Vanta is the better choice for policy enforcement, data governance, and compliance monitoring. 

	Hyperproof	Vanta
User-friendliness	8.9/10	9/10
Support	9.6/10	9.2/10
Compliance monitoring	9.2/10	9.5/10
Data governance	8.2/10	8.7/10
Workflow management	8.6/10	8.4/10

AuditBoard

AuditBoard integrates risk, audit, and compliance in a single platform to empower strategic decision-making and strengthen business resilience. IT teams can consolidate compliance data, system records, and enterprise risks to boost collaboration.

AuditBoard helps to manage internal control compliance, manage audit projects from a centralized platform, and streamline data collection.

Pros

• The risk module helps IT teams make better decisions, undergo risk assessments, and manage enterprise risks
• Simplifies control-related activities like tracking, assigning ownership, connecting it to frameworks, identifying issues, and testing from a centralized console
• User friendly and intuitive user interface helps to navigate and configure items easily
• The SOX hub helps to easily manage and implement auditing requirements like control configuration, documentation, and more

Cons

• The risk assessment functionality does not allow users to connect to ERP or upload formatted financial statements easily
• AuditBoard sync does not support viewing or uploading multiple files at once. Users faced timeout issues, losing work in the process
• Initial setup is time-consuming and has a slight learning curve
• The system does not have a feature to schedule quarterly audits and assignments

AuditBoard VS Hyperproof

Assessing the capabilities of both the solutions, reviewers found Hyperproof easier to set up, felt it met their requirements better, and preferred the quality of support. For feature mapping, however, AuditBoard fares better. 

	Hyperproof	AuditBoard
User-friendliness	8.9/10	8.3/10
Support	9.6/10	8.9/10
Risk identification	9.2/10	8.4/10
Audit trail	8.8/10	9.0/10
Security and privacy	9.0/10	8.7/10

LogicGate

LogicGate is a governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform that helps organizations scale and adapt to dynamic regulatory requirements.

It helps users evaluate third-party risks, consolidate regulatory and compliance management, discover organizational risks, and optimize evidence collection.

Pros

• Facilitates deep customization within the solution to launch business-specific projects rather than a generic one
• The report builder enables users to create workflows and visualize useful data to identify risks
• An in-house team of professionals help businesses address queries and quickly offer resolutions
• Teams can easily manage vendor compliance requirements, enterprise risk programs, and incidents

Cons

• Does not offer sandboxing capabilities to facilitate application testing before deploying the live version
• While the platform facilitates deep customization, the lack of out-of-the-box guidelines and self-help resources add to the configuration effort
• Many users reported an initial learning curve, especially for individuals from a non-technical background

Must check: Sprinto Vs. LogicGate Comparison: The Best Option For 2025

LogicGate VS Hyperproof

Overall, Hyperproof is easier to set up, use, and administer. Both the solutions stack up equally well against each other for quality of support and meeting business requirements. 

	Hyperproof	LogicGate
User-friendliness	8.9/10	9/10
Support	9.6/10	9.2/10
Compliance monitoring	9.2/10	9.5/10
Data governance	8.2/10	8.7/10
Workflow management	8.6/10	8.4/10

The effortless and cost-effective way to compliance

Selecting a compliance and risk partner is not an easy decision. It requires thorough analysis, an understanding of the capabilities in-depth, and various internal factors.

Not to toot our own horn, but we offer all the capabilities any GRC tools offer and much more. Many customers already chose us over Hyperproof due to their limited automation capabilities and cost effectiveness. 

Talk to our compliance wizards to learn how we helped businesses like yours ditch compliance drudgery and launch easily.

FAQs

Which Hyperproof alternative has the best integration capabilities?

Sprinto stands out as a top choice among alternatives to Hyperproof by providing effortless, built-in integrations tailored to streamline the accurate, swift, and thorough collection of evidence for both cloud-based and on-premise applications. 

What are the common drawbacks customers face with Hyperproof?

Despite being highly favored for their customer support, simplicity, and effectiveness, the tool somewhat does not square up when it comes to its automation capabilities as it leaves a lot to manual activities.  

What features make Hyperproof a good solution for small and medium-sized businesses?

Hyperproof helps small to medium businesses manage their GRC program, meet auditing requirements, and automate a number of compliance processes. 

Selecting a compliance and risk partner is not an easy decision. It requires thorough analysis, an understanding of the capabilities in-depth, and various internal factors.

Not to toot our own horn, but we offer all the capabilities any GRC tools offer and much more.

Talk to our compliance wizards to learn more about how we helped businesses like yours ditch compliance drudgery and launch easily.