The compliance platform market has never been louder. Every platform promises faster audits, better automation, and seamless support. But when it comes time to choose between tools like Oneleet, Vanta, and Delve, the real question is not just what they claim to do, but what actually works for your stage, team, and compliance goals.
This blog cuts through the noise. We break down how these platforms stack up across pricing, features, integrations, scalability, audit support, and more. Whether you’re chasing your first SOC 2 or building a multi-framework compliance engine, this guide gives you the clarity to make the right call.
Onleet vs Vanta vs Delve: A quick overview
Oneleet
Oneleet is purpose-built for early-stage startups that need to kickstart SOC 2 compliance automation or ISO 27001 compliance software without overloading their small teams. As a Vanta alternative, it offers core automation features like real-time alerts and custom controls, with 17+ integrations covering essential systems such as cloud providers and code repositories. Its transparent pricing and CPA audit support in select plans make it an accessible entry point.
However, Oneleet lacks in advanced automation and doesn’t include native capabilities for MDM or employee security training. As a result, fast-growing companies may outgrow their capabilities if they plan to pursue multiple frameworks or scale compliance operations aggressively.
Vanta
Vanta is built for startups and mid-market companies looking to automate their path to compliance. For teams that want a Delve alternative with more robust integrations and automation, Vanta support for SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 27001, and 300+ integrations, Vanta streamlines compliance across departments. It comes with built-in policy templates, training modules, and 1,200+ automated checks, making it ideal for companies pursuing multiple frameworks simultaneously.
That said, Vanta’s pricing is higher and less transparent. Add-ons for MDM, incident tracking, and audit assistance can inflate total cost of ownership. Still, for scaling companies with complex compliance needs, the platform delivers significant ROI through automation and audit-readiness tools.
Delve
Delve takes a security-operations-first approach to compliance. Companies looking for a Drata alternative with deeper security posture visibility and concierge audit support may find Delve a good fit. It integrates real-time dashboards, automated evidence gathering, and security scorecards that help companies understand their risk posture as they pursue certifications like SOC 2 or ISO 27001. With white-glove audit support and tailored onboarding, Delve is ideal for companies with internal security teams.
While Delve is a newer entrant with fewer frameworks and integrations than competitors, it excels in continuous monitoring and compliance visibility. Its semi-transparent pricing and security-first DNA make it a strong fit for technical teams who want to blend audit-readiness with real-time security oversight.
Oneleet vs Vanta vs Delve: Side-by-side feature comparison
| Features | Oneleet | Vanta | Delve |
| Frameworks Supported | 6+ | 5+ | 6 |
| Integrations | ~17 | 300+ | 100+ |
| Automated Testing | Partial | 1,200+ | Moderate |
| Built-in MDM & Security Tools | No | No | Limited |
| Evidence Collection | Semi-auto | Full-auto | Full-auto |
| Pricing Transparency | High | Low | Moderate |
| Audit Support | CPA in bundle | Auditor tools | Expert team |
| Ideal For | Startups | Mid-market | SecOps teams |
Implementation and time-to-value analysis
Oneleet typically takes 2–4 weeks to implement, depending on how much internal bandwidth a startup has. Most onboarding tasks are DIY, meaning a startup must dedicate engineering or IT resources to get up and running. This can be a fast track to audit-readiness if the compliance scope is limited to SOC 2 or ISO 27001. However, setup complexity grows if you need to add frameworks later, which may slow you down.
Delve is the fastest to achieve compliance certification, with customers becoming audit-ready in days to weeks rather than months. Its high-touch, concierge-style onboarding ensures that customers don’t have to figure things out on their own. This speed is especially valuable for security-focused teams that want to get started with real-time monitoring and automated evidence collection without a long ramp-up period. However, the limited number of prebuilt integrations may create friction in complex environments.
Vanta, on the other hand, averages 4–8 weeks to deploy. While this is the longest of the three, the delay is offset by deeper automation, comprehensive onboarding guidance, and a more scalable architecture. Their team assists with setup and control mapping, which minimizes risk of misconfiguration. Vanta’s longer setup time is an investment in long-term compliance efficiency, especially for mid-market teams.
Verdict: If you need to get started fast and have minimal frameworks to manage, Delve is the fastest to go live. Oneleet is good for startups who can handle setup internally and want cost-effective compliance. Vanta is best for teams who value depth and scale over speed, especially if you’re targeting multiple frameworks or want structured guidance.
Total cost of ownership breakdown
Oneleet keeps upfront costs low, which is ideal for early-stage startups. However, it doesn’t bundle critical features like MDM, security training, or incident tracking, which means additional tools must be purchased separately. Over time, these external add-ons can raise the total cost of ownership, particularly if your compliance scope expands.
Vanta begins at a higher price point and its base plans often require purchasing add-ons like MDM integration, audit support, and employee training modules. Although this raises the short-term cost, Vanta delivers strong ROI for organizations managing multiple frameworks by reducing manual effort through automation. Discounts for multi-year contracts can reduce costs, but budget planning remains complex due to add-ons.
Delve includes premium audit assistance in its pricing, which makes its per-seat cost appear higher. However, for companies with complex security needs, the white-glove service and built-in support can offer significant value. Delve’s pricing tends to be customized and less transparent, making comparisons harder without direct engagement.
Verdict: If you’re optimizing for minimal upfront spend, Oneleet is the most accessible. For teams that want built-in automation and can invest more upfront, Vanta offers better long-term ROI while Delve is best if audit readiness and white-glove support are high-priority, even if per-seat cost is higher.
Technical architecture and integrations
Oneleet supports basic integrations with cloud providers, code repositories, and HR tools, making it a good fit for simple compliance environments. Its APIs are limited, which restricts extensibility and may create roadblocks for teams looking to customize workflows or integrate niche systems. Automated testing coverage is partial, which means more manual oversight may be required.
Delve is rapidly expanding its integration ecosystem. While it trails Vanta in total connectors, it offers stronger API access than Oneleet, giving engineering teams more flexibility. Its focus is on security-specific automation and evidence tracking. Though scalable in architecture, the platform’s limited framework coverage may be a constraint as your compliance scope broadens.
Vanta stands out with 300+ integrations and 1,200+ automated checks, offering unmatched breadth and depth. Its robust API capabilities make it highly extensible, supporting advanced workflows and third-party tools. Vanta is optimized for cross-framework deployment and multi-entity organizations, making it ideal for companies aiming to scale their compliance programs efficiently.
Verdict: If your tech stack is small, choose Oneleet for simplicity. Delve is better suited when security integrations are a priority and you’re willing to trade breadth for focus. Vanta is a great solution when your team needs extensive integrations and automated scaling across frameworks.
Multi-framework readiness
Oneleet currently supports a small set of frameworks, making it less suitable for companies planning to expand into HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI-DSS in the near term. Cross-framework mapping and reuse of controls are limited, which can add rework when layering additional certifications.
Delve is expanding its framework coverage but focusing on core standards like SOC 2 and ISO 27001. It doesn’t yet support robust multi-framework automation, which may be a blocker for fast-scaling teams.
Vanta excels at handling multiple frameworks simultaneously. Its control mapping engine helps teams reuse existing work, reducing the marginal effort needed for each new certification. Framework expansion is straightforward due to its broad coverage.
Verdict: Vanta is clearly the best choice for multi-framework programs. Delve works for those with a limited scope. Oneleet is better for single-framework compliance.
Audit support and experience
Oneleet includes access to CPA audit support in some packages but lacks a structured auditor experience. Evidence is collected within the platform, but must be manually shared with auditors, which can slow audit timelines.
Delve shines with its white-glove audit experience. The platform offers expert-led audit prep, evidence mapping, and documentation support, helping internal teams navigate audits with minimal stress. For companies with high-risk profiles, Delve’s team also guides penetration testing for compliance readiness.
Vanta provides a robust audit experience with an auditor-facing dashboard, automated evidence management, and access to a vetted auditor network. It’s well-equipped for both first-time audits and repeat certifications.
Verdict: For guided audit prep, Delve offers the most personal support. For automation and scale, Vanta is unmatched. Oneleet works if you want to keep things lean and use your auditor.
Continuous monitoring and real-time compliance
Oneleet offers basic real-time checks for automated controls, but relies on manual intervention for remediation. Alerts are functional but lack sophisticated escalation models, which may delay issue resolution.
Delve provides real-time monitoring with a focus on security alerts and risk posture, delivering strong capabilities in continuous compliance monitoring. It excels in identifying drift and prompting remediation but lacks automation in handling non-standard controls.
Vanta leads with full real-time monitoring, tiered alerting, and automated remediation workflows. It tracks compliance continuously and escalates issues proactively, reducing last-minute surprises during audits.
Verdict: Oneleet suffices for basic compliance monitoring. Delve delivers deeper security insights. If you need continuous, automated compliance across systems, Vanta is the strongest option.
Which platform wins for SOC 2 compliance?
With its short setup timeline and lightweight onboarding, Oneleet helps early-stage teams quickly move toward SOC 2 readiness. It’s ideal for lean teams with straightforward tech environments looking to achieve compliance quickly.
Delve supports SOC 2 with strong real-time monitoring and expert guidance, reducing manual effort during audit preparation. It suits companies with security-heavy postures and internal compliance maturity.
Vanta provides the most comprehensive SOC 2 readiness through deep automation, rich integrations, and built-in audit support tools. It’s the best option for companies pursuing SOC 2 alongside other frameworks or at scale.
Verdict: For speed, go with Oneleet. For high-touch, security-led audits, choose Delve. For depth and scalability, choose Vanta.
Finding the right fit based on company size
Oneleet is tailored to early-stage startups with smaller teams and simpler compliance needs. It offers fast setup, minimal overhead, and transparent pricing, making it ideal for companies just starting their compliance journey.
Delve caters to startups with strong internal security teams or technical leadership. It offers real-time visibility and hands-on audit guidance, but more internal security expertise may be required to fully benefit from the platform.
Vanta is best suited for mid-market companies managing multiple frameworks and requiring a structured, automation-heavy compliance strategy. It scales well across departments and frameworks, offering long-term value for growing businesses.
Verdict: Pick Oneleet if you need quick wins on a budget. Choose Delve if security ops is your priority. Opt for Vanta if you’re scaling fast and want automated control across teams.
Conclusion
Choosing the right compliance automation platform is no longer about picking a tool that simply gets you through SOC 2. It’s about finding a system that scales with your business, reduces overhead, supports multiple frameworks, and keeps your audit-readiness continuous.
Oneleet works for lean startups looking for affordable entry-level compliance. Vanta is the go-to for mid-market companies that need automation, structure, and scale. Delve is ideal for security-minded teams that need hands-on audit help and real-time visibility.
But if you’re looking for a single platform that offers all of the above, startup-friendly agility, enterprise-grade automation, and expert support, Sprinto is the clear choice.
Unlike Oneleet, Sprinto scales effortlessly across frameworks and teams. Unlike Vanta, Sprinto includes built-in essentials like MDM, security training, and audit support with no hidden costs. And unlike Delve, Sprinto brings continuous compliance without dependency on manual interventions or patchwork integrations.
With Sprinto, you get:
- Framework coverage: Support for 30+ frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and GDPR
- Integration ecosystem: 200+ native integrations and open APIs for full ecosystem coverage
- In-built tooling: Built-in MDM, policy templates, employee security training, and incident tracking
- Automation depth: 99% automation for both system and manual controls
- Real-time monitoring: Tiered real-time alerts with preemptive compliance drift detection
- Expert support: Big 4-grade support with 1 to 2 hour response SLAs across time zones
- Pricing model: Transparent, modular pricing designed to scale with your business
Sprinto replaces complexity with clarity and turns compliance into a strategic advantage. If you’re serious about eliminating manual work, accelerating audits, and making security a growth driver, not a bottleneck, now’s the time to see Sprinto in action.
Book your demo today and experience what compliance done right really looks like.
| Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This article was last updated in August 2025. |
FAQs
Vanta leads in this category with 300+ integrations across cloud platforms, HR tools, ticketing systems, and code repositories. Delve is quickly expanding its integration library and currently supports 100+ connectors, while Oneleet supports around 17 integrations focused on essential startup tooling.
If you’re optimizing for a lean budget, Oneleet is the most affordable entry point into SOC 2 compliance. It’s ideal for startups who can self-manage setup. Delve may cost more per seat but includes white-glove onboarding and audit support. Vanta costs more upfront but provides deeper automation, which can reduce long-term manual workload. When comparing Oneleet vs Delve, Oneleet may win on price, but Delve often delivers more value through premium service.
Vanta supports a broad list of frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and PCI-DSS, making it ideal for companies looking to scale compliance across multiple standards. Delve is catching up with support for 6 frameworks, and Oneleet recently added coverage for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and a few more, making it viable for simpler compliance programs.
Yes, all three platforms offer audit support, but the depth and delivery differ. Oneleet includes CPA audit support in some plans but requires manual evidence sharing. Vanta provides an auditor-facing dashboard and vetted auditor network. Delve offers full-service audit readiness through a concierge team, something that stands out in any Delve security review.
Sprinto combines the best of all three platforms: the startup-friendliness of Oneleet, the scale and automation of Vanta, and the security visibility of Delve. Unlike others, it includes built-in tools like MDM, security training, and incident tracking at no extra cost. With 30+ frameworks, 200+ integrations, and 99% automation, Sprinto is purpose-built to replace complexity with confidence, making it an ideal choice whether you’re evaluating Oneleet vs Delve or looking for a comprehensive upgrade.
Bhavyadeep Sinh Rathod
Bhavyadeep Sinh Rathod is a Senior Content Writer at Sprinto. He has over 7 years of experience creating compelling content across technology, automation, and compliance sectors. Known for his ability to simplify complex compliance and technical concepts while maintaining accuracy, he brings a unique blend of deep industry knowledge and engaging storytelling that resonates with both technical and business audiences. Outside of work, he’s passionate about geopolitics, philosophy, stand-up comedy, chess, and quizzing.
Explore more
research & insights curated to help you earn a seat at the table.

















