Top 10 DORA Compliance Software: Side-By-Side Comparison

If you’re a financial entity or an ICT (information and communication technology) provider in the EU, you must know the new regulation: DORA (The Digital Operational Resilience Act). 

Implementing DORA either includes ICT risk management, incident response and reporting, resilience testing, and third-party risk management (TPRM)—or risk facing fines of up to 2% of annual global turnover.

Given the 64 articles across nine chapters of the DORA Act, financial businesses desperately need DORA compliance software. This guide provides a side-by-side comparison of the top tools, including key features, ratings, and overall suitability for financial institutions. 

Here are the top 10 tools that can be used for DORA compliance:

Software	G2 rating	Best suited for	Pricing
Sprinto	4.8/5	Startups & SMBs needing strong automation, real-time monitoring, hands-on support, and comprehensive DORA compliance	Get a quotation
ProcessUnity	4.5/5	Large enterprises prioritizing third-party/vendor risk management, supplier assessments	Starts around $18,000/year
Formalize	4.9/5	Mid-sized European businesses requiring essential compliance management across multiple EU frameworks (DORA, ISO, GDPR, NIS2) with multilingual support	Customized quotes: affordable initially but can increase due to manual efforts
Scrut	4.9/5	Companies preferring flexible workflows and affordable continuous compliance with moderate automation	$10,000–$20,000 annually
Hyperproof	4.5/5	Large enterprises managing multiple complex compliance frameworks (DORA, ISO, GDPR, SOC 2) requiring sophisticated cross-framework mapping	Starts around $12,000 annually; scales up significantly
Vanta	4.6/5	Mid-sized businesses needing intuitive compliance automation and streamlined audits	Starts at ~$12,000 annually
Drata	4.8/5	High-growth companies seeking strong automation across multiple frameworks including DORA	Starts around $15,000/year, based on organization
SAI 360	4.1/5	Large enterprises with complex regulatory workflows needing deep risk analytics and control mapping	Custom pricing; typically exceeds $20,000/year
3rd Risk	4.6/5	Organizations with a sharp focus on third-party and vendor risk monitoring	Starts at ~$12,000/year, scales with vendor scope
UpGuard	4.5/5	Companies focused on vendor risk assessments with dedicated DORA-specific templates	Customized pricing depending on assessment needs

What is a DORA compliance software?

A DORA compliance software is a tool designed to protect your financial business from digital disruptions, cyber threats, and IT risks, as mandated by the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). In simpler terms, it’s about ensuring your company stays safe, secure, and operational, no matter what hits your digital systems.

But here’s the thing: staying compliant manually is painful, risky, and, honestly, outdated. And that’s precisely where DORA compliance software comes in. It is tools designed to simplify, automate, and streamline compliance tasks. 

Think of it as your compliance autopilot, taking care of risk management, incident tracking, vendor oversight, and audit readiness

10 best DORA compliance software you must be aware of

DORA compliance may not be everybody’s cup of tea, since it’s as rigorous as GDPR. Plus, it’s new, so its requirements may not yet be mapped to controls built into most GRC tools. 

We’ve gone through tools and platforms to find you the best DORA compliance software with pros, cons and pricing.

1. Sprinto

If you’re a startup or SMB tackling DORA compliance, you don’t need just another automation tool – you need a trusted partner (G2 rating of 4.8/5) to guide you through complexities you’ve likely never faced before. That’s exactly what Sprinto does differently.

Sprinto goes beyond basic automation, uniquely tailored for finance-aligned businesses new to rigorous frameworks like DORA or ISO 27001. 

It automates up to 70% of tedious compliance tasks and offers 200+ seamless integrations—including AWS, GitHub, Azure, and Okta.

Pros:

• Automated real-time risk monitoring: Instantly track and respond to internal and external ICT risks, preventing costly compliance gaps before they occur.
  
• Built-in risk register (ISO 27005 aligned): Easily inventory risks, perform tailored assessments, and implement precise risk treatments suitable for your organization’s unique operational context.
  
• Vendor risk management: Effortlessly build or refine your third-party risk management program with ongoing due diligence and continuous risk tracking.
  
• Comprehensive governance framework: Leverage ready-to-use policy templates, easily manage policy acknowledgments, and maintain tight version control—all within Sprinto’s intuitive dashboard.
  
• Secure Controls Framework (SCF) control mapping & compliance tracking: Use over 100 pre-built SCF controls mapped to DORA requirements, customize workflows as needed, and get real-time compliance alerts via Sprinto’s unified interface.
  
• Centralized evidence hub: Automate evidence collection and streamline audits and regulatory reviews, eliminating manual, error-prone processes.

Cons:

• Not built for enterprise level complexity: Sprinto is best suited for startups and mid-market businesses. While it offers solid automation and integrations, it may fall short of environments typical of large financial institutions or multinational enterprises.
• May require onboarding support for first-time users: While Sprinto integrates with 200+ tools, setting up and syncing all your systems can take some planning, especially if you’re migrating from manual or fragmented compliance workflows.

Most importantly, Sprinto doesn’t leave you to navigate compliance alone. 

Customers consistently highlight Sprinto’s unmatched customer support, calling it “like having a personal compliance coach.” Simply put, Sprinto gets you DORA-ready faster, easier, and more reliably than anyone else.

Pricing: Tailored to your company. No hidden surprises.

2. ProcessUnity 

ProcessUnity is a solid choice if your compliance journey heavily revolves around managing third-party risks. The platform performs well when it comes to vendor oversight, supplier risk assessments, and maintaining DORA’s critical Register of Information. 

However, ProcessUnity’s strength can also be its limitation, particularly for startups and SMBs seeking broader compliance automation and real-time monitoring. 

Pros:

• Excellent vendor risk management and third-party oversight.
• One-click DORA Register of Information creation.
• Solid reputation for large, enterprise-scale businesses.
• Dedicated supplier risk management

Cons:

• Limited overall automation compared to Sprinto.
• Real-time monitoring and compliance tracking capabilities are minimal.
• Not an ideal fit if you require comprehensive compliance management across multiple frameworks.

Pricing:
Generally higher, starting around $18,000/year, making it less ideal for startups and budget-conscious SMBs.

3. Formalize 

Formalize positions itself as a straightforward compliance platform designed primarily with European regulations in mind – making it particularly suitable if you’re navigating multiple EU frameworks simultaneously (DORA, ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2). Its intuitive user experience and multilingual capabilities have made it attractive for mid-sized European firms new to structured compliance.

But here’s the catch: Formalize prioritizes simplicity and accessibility over robust automation and advanced features. As a result, SMBs and startups looking for deeper automation, real-time risk monitoring, and ongoing compliance tracking—areas critical for DORA—may quickly feel Formalize’s limitations.

Formalize’s capabilities are lighter, requiring more manual effort from your compliance teams. 

Pros:

• Easy-to-use interface and straightforward onboarding.
• Solid for European regulatory alignment (DORA, ISO, GDPR, NIS2).
• Ideal for teams seeking essential compliance management without complexity.
• Good multilingual and multi-framework support

Cons:

• Limited automation capabilities.
• Basic real-time compliance tracking; may not support rigorous continuous monitoring needs.
• Smaller integration ecosystem, meaning manual evidence collection could become time-consuming.

Pricing:
Customized quotes available upon request, offer a free trial. Likely affordable initially but could become costlier as manual effort and complexity increase.

4. Scrut

With a solid G2 rating of 4.6/5, Scrut is gaining traction because it makes continuous compliance affordable and accessible.

Scrut’s platform is big on flexibility—meaning you can tailor your compliance workflow specifically around your organization’s needs. Think automated control testing, real-time compliance dashboards, and streamlined vendor assessments. Scrut also integrates neatly with 70+ platforms like AWS, Jira, and GitHub.

While Scrut does automation well, it still requires more manual intervention. You might find yourself spending additional hours manually collecting certain evidence or setting up controls. It’s ideal for organizations that are comfortable with a slightly more hands-on approach.

Pros:

• Customizable compliance workflows to suit varied industry requirements.
• Cost-effective for startups and SMBs.
• Easy to set up, intuitive user experience.

Cons:

• Automation is good—but not great. It still requires manual effort.
• Limited integrations compared to the comprehensive ecosystem Sprinto provides.

Pricing:
Typically, between $10,000–$20,000 annually based on the complexity of your compliance needs.

5. Hyperproof

Hyperproof positions itself as the enterprise-level heavyweight for compliance management. It’s a powerful platform rated 4.7/5 on G2, aimed at larger financial institutions or tech enterprises with complex compliance frameworks. 

If your organization juggles multiple compliance standards simultaneously—like DORA, ISO 27001, GDPR, and SOC 2—Hyperproof is built precisely for that.

The platform’s strongest feature is its sophisticated control mapping. Implementing a single control automatically satisfies multiple compliance frameworks. 

However, Hyperproof’s complexity can be overwhelming for small teams or businesses that don’t need such comprehensive oversight. 

Pros:

• Excellent cross-framework compliance mapping reduces duplicate work.
• Detailed analytics and reporting are ideal for executive-level oversight.
• Strong integration capabilities for enterprise tech stacks.

Cons:

• Complexity and the learning curve can be daunting.
• More extended onboarding and deployment cycles.
• Automation capabilities are robust but still lag behind Sprinto’s streamlined automation model.

Pricing:
It starts at around $12,000 annually and quickly scales up based on user numbers and complexity. It is suitable primarily for larger enterprises.

6. Vanta

Vanta simplifies DORA compliance for mid-sized businesses by automating risk management, continuous monitoring, and evidence collection. Its intuitive user experience helps teams new to compliance quickly navigate the requirements.

Beyond core automation, Vanta helps teams cut down manual documentation efforts by syncing compliance evidence directly from integrated systems. 

Pros:

• Robust automation for compliance tasks.
• Seamless integrations with popular platforms (AWS, GitHub, Azure).
• Easy setup and intuitive dashboards.
  

Cons:

• Less suitable for highly complex enterprise environments.
• Limited customization for detailed, organization-specific controls.
  

Pricing: Starts at approximately $12,000 annually, customized based on organization size and complexity.

7. Drata

Drata (G2 rating of 4.8/5) stands out for strong automation capabilities across various compliance frameworks, including DORA, ISO 27001, and SOC 2. Ideal for companies seeking efficient compliance without extensive manual oversight.

Its compliance graph view gives real-time visibility into gaps across frameworks, enabling cross-mapping of controls to eliminate duplication. Teams benefit from intelligent alerts, automatic task assignments, and a centralized policy library.

Pros:

• Excellent automated control testing and continuous monitoring.
• Comprehensive integration ecosystem (AWS, Slack, Jira).
• User-friendly dashboards for easy compliance tracking.
  

Cons:

• Initial setup and integration can require support for first-time users.
• May be overly complex for small teams without dedicated compliance personnel.
  

Pricing: Customized quotes based on organizational needs, typically starts around $15,000 annually.

8. SAI360

SAI360 (G2 rating of 4.6/5) delivers comprehensive risk management and compliance solutions for larger enterprises tackling DORA compliance. Its strengths lie in sophisticated risk assessments, vendor management, and extensive reporting.

SAI360’s modular approach lets organizations configure workflows across risk domains while aligning with specific regulatory frameworks. The platform also supports real-time risk scoring and audit trails critical for board-level reporting.

Pros:

• Robust risk management capabilities tailored for complex environments.
• Excellent vendor and third-party risk assessment tools.
• Detailed reporting and analytics for executive oversight.
  

Cons:

• High complexity and steep learning curve.
• Requires dedicated resources for optimal use.
  

Pricing: Custom pricing starting at higher tiers, generally exceeding $20,000 annually based on enterprise requirements.

9. 3rdRisk

3rdRisk (G2 rating of 4.5/5) specifically focuses on third-party and vendor risk management within DORA compliance frameworks. Ideal for organizations emphasizing vendor oversight and continuous third-party monitoring.

The platform centralizes due diligence workflows, helping organizations evaluate vendors based on criticality, geography, and regulatory exposure. Built-in dashboards provide a snapshot of residual risk levels and contract health across your third-party ecosystem.

Pros:

• Specialized third-party risk management solutions.
• Real-time vendor assessments and continuous monitoring.
• Strong alignment with DORA vendor risk requirements.
  

Cons:

• Limited capabilities beyond vendor management.
• Less suitable as an all-in-one compliance solution.
  

Pricing: Customized pricing, typically starting around $12,000 annually, scaling based on vendor complexity and scope.

10. UpGuard

UpGuard (G2 rating of 4.6/5) is a vendor risk management platform that offers tools to assist organizations in assessing third-party adherence to DORA requirements. It provides a DORA-specific questionnaire and risk assessment templates to evaluate vendor compliance with ICT risk management, incident reporting, and resilience standards. 

While UpGuard focuses on third-party risk assessments, it may require integration with other tools to achieve comprehensive DORA compliance across all five pillars.​

Pros:

• Pre-configured DORA questionnaire for vendor assessments.
• Automated workflows to identify compliance gaps.
• Supports mapping to NIST CSF and ISO 27001 frameworks.

Cons:

• Primarily focused on third-party risk; limited internal ICT risk management features.
• May need additional tools for full-spectrum DORA compliance.
  

Pricing: Customized pricing based on organizational needs and scale.​

Why do you need DORA compliance software?

Let’s cut straight to the point: Manual compliance processes are a compliance disaster waiting to happen. DORA’s requirements around ICT risk management, incident response, vendor oversight, and real-time reporting make manual processes inefficient and dangerously inadequate.

Compliance software solves this. It centralizes risk data, automates repetitive tasks, continuously monitors ICT controls, and prepares your business for unexpected digital disruptions. Automation isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s necessary if you want to remain audit-ready without burning out your compliance team.

Moreover, DORA compliance isn’t optional; non-compliance means heavy fines and serious reputational damage. Good compliance software ensures you meet regulatory deadlines effortlessly and keeps you continuously compliant, reducing both operational risk and cost.

The one-stop solution for DORA compliance automation

The best way to approach DORA compliance is through a single, integrated platform that covers every aspect of the regulation. A one-stop solution ensures everything from ICT risk management and vendor oversight to incident response and control monitoring happens seamlessly in one place.

Many finance-aligned businesses, particularly those without prior experience in frameworks like ISO 27001, find themselves overwhelmed navigating DORA’s intricate requirements around real-time risk monitoring, ongoing compliance tracking, and rigorous vendor assessments.

An ideal one-stop solution:

• Automates evidence collection and continuous control monitoring.
• Integrates with your existing tech stack effortlessly.
• Provides intuitive dashboards for real-time compliance tracking.
• Offers proactive alerts and streamlined reporting for regulators.

Why Sprinto remains your best bet

Sprinto is exactly the kind of comprehensive, one-stop solution that makes DORA compliance manageable. 

Sprinto’s automation-first platform, combined with rich built-in resources (templates, risk registers, policy documentation), ensures your compliance processes become effortless, systematic, and stress-free. 

Its powerful dashboards offer real-time visibility into your compliance status, immediately alerting you of deviations or emerging risks—ensuring ongoing compliance, not just point-in-time assessments.

If you’re serious about compliance, Sprinto is your clear choice. It’s more than a software solution; it’s a partner in your compliance journey. See Sprinto in action.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Who needs to comply with DORA?
   DORA applies broadly to EU-based financial entities, including banks, insurers, payment providers, crypto firms, and critical third-party ICT service providers.
2. What’s the risk of not complying with DORA?
   Non-compliance could lead to heavy fines, operational disruptions, regulatory scrutiny, and severe reputational damage.
3. Can small companies handle DORA compliance manually?
   Practically speaking—no. DORA compliance involves continuous risk monitoring, complex vendor assessments, and real-time incident reporting. Manual handling increases the risk of costly errors and missed compliance requirements.
4. When must companies be DORA-compliant?
   Compliance must be achieved by January 2025. Acting early prevents costly compliance rushes and last-minute risk management mistakes.