Best Compliance Audit Software (2025): Top 11 Picks

Audits go off the rails fast. Scattered spreadsheets, checklist sprawl, tool fatigue, endless auditor emails, and last‑minute gaps turn predictable reviews into chaos. Even mature teams miss deadlines when the evidence and owners aren’t clear. This guide cuts through the noise with 11 audit and compliance platforms that actually reduce audit risk and effort in 2025—what each does well, where it falls short, and when to choose it based on your frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI), headcount, and stack.

We have compiled a list of top compliance audit software to help your business maximize benefits while minimizing costs and resources.

What is compliance audit software?

Compliance audit software enables teams to demonstrate and maintain compliance with security, privacy, and quality standards (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS) as well as internal policies. It reduces manual work, so you hit audit dates consistently.

Typical capabilities include:

• Alerts and dashboards for failed controls, due dates, and ownership
• Integrations with cloud, SSO, HR, code, and IT tools to automate evidence collection from the source
• Control libraries mapped to frameworks, with reusable tests and checks
• Auditor workspace to track requests, share artifacts, and minimize email back‑and‑forth

How We Chose the Best Compliance Audit Software

We evaluated tools for IT/security, quality, and operational audits using publicly available sources. We drew on vendor documentation, pricing pages, case studies, analyst reports, and user reviews to assess the fit for mid-market teams that need automation, clear ownership, and faster auditor handoffs.

• The platform should offer deep integrations and real‑time monitoring across cloud, identity, HRIS, ticketing, code, and security tools, so system data and checks are continuously pulled into one place.
• The tool should automate evidence collection and gap detection, flagging missing or outdated items early to prevent last‑minute scrambling during audits.
• The software should support framework and control mapping that enables the reuse of controls across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI, with clear links from checks, policies, and risks back to controls.
• The product should include built-in auditor collaboration, providing auditors with a workspace to self-serve evidence, comment, and track findings without lengthy email threads.
• Contextual AI assistance should be embedded in records such as policies, risks, vendors, and evidence, allowing teams to summarize, suggest, and answer grounded questions within the workflow.

The 11 Best Compliance Audit Software Picks (2025)

Automation has moved from a nice-to-have to a table-stakes requirement: IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach report shows that organizations with extensive security automation reduce average breach costs to approximately $3.62 million, compared with $5.52 million without it. Moreover, audit pressure is rising, with 62% of enterprises audited by a major software vendor in the past year. For mid-market teams, that raises the bar for selecting tools.

The right platform should standardize planning, automate evidence, integrate widely, and streamline auditor collaboration. Using the criteria above and publicly available sources, we identified 11 tools and noted where each fits best by framework coverage, team size, and implementation effort.

• Sprinto
• LexComply
• ADAudit Plus
• VComply
• MasterControl
• Symbiant
• AuditBoard
• DoneSafe
• SafetyCulture (formerly iAuditor)
• MetricStream
• AssurX

1. Sprinto

Sprinto is a top cloud-based compliance audit software that emphasizes deep integrations, evidence automation, and an auditor‑friendly hub. It’s designed to run continuous control checks, reuse evidence across frameworks, and keep owners, reviewers, and auditors moving without email chaos.

Top features

1. Automated evidence and continuous control checks: Integrations pull proof from source systems and validate control health continuously, surfacing gaps early and maintaining a defensible trail.
2. Contextual AI in audit workflows: Ask AI supports policy, risk, vendor, and staff questions in context; Evidence Gap Analysis flags missing or stale files during uploads; and auto‑mapping links controls to frameworks, policies, and risks.
3. Faster security questionnaires: AI-suggested answers, a Chrome extension to assist with vendor portals, and multi-language support help teams complete reviews more efficiently.

Advantages of Sprinto	Disadvantages of Sprinto
Single dashboard for gaps, control health, and audit status	Few users mention minor UX rough edges in specific flows
Strong integrations reduce manual evidence work	No in‑house audit firm; works with partners or your auditor
Maintains a clear audit trail and workflows that minimize last‑minute surprises

Who’s it for: Mid‑market SaaS and technology teams that run recurring audits across multiple frameworks and want automation‑first operations with a clear auditor hand‑off.

Pricing: Tiered and quote‑based, scaling by scope, users, and integrations

2. LexComply

LexComply is a Compliance Management Solution (CMS) designed to manage an organization’s statutory compliance, enterprise risk, litigation, and contract lifecycle. It is recognized for its in-depth coverage of legal and regulatory requirements, particularly those applicable in APAC and across global operations.

Top features

1. Comprehensive legal library: Its standout feature is a pre-built repository of over 2,000 central and state laws (especially for India/APAC), automatically mapping regulatory changes to your compliance calendar.
2. Litigation management: A unique module that centrally monitors legal cases and notices, allowing teams to track hearings, store case documents, and collaborate with external counsel.
3. Compliance Organogram: It maps responsibilities across the entire organization, linking multiple entities, locations, and departments, to ensure every statutory requirement has a clear owner (First Person Responsible).

Advantages of LexComply	Disadvantages of LexComply
Strong India/APAC regulatory coverage	Depth of detail in the system can, at times, feel excessive or “too much” for general management oversight
Reported ease of use and responsive support	May be complex for teams focused narrowly on IT/Security compliance

Who’s it for: APAC-headquartered firms, compliance consultancies, and multi-entity organizations subject to multiple central and state laws, statutory deadlines, and regulatory reporting requirements, rather than purely security-focused audits.

Pricing: Typically quote‑based

3. ADAudit Plus

ADAudit Plus is an infrastructure-focused audit tool designed for organizations that treat Active Directory, Windows servers, and file servers as primary audit surfaces. It’s oriented toward IT/security teams that need detailed, real-time visibility for IT compliance checks and internal audits rather than end-to-end framework management.

Top features

1. Real-time AD and Windows change tracking: Monitors logons, group policy changes, permission updates, and account activity across domain controllers, member servers, and file servers, with prebuilt reports mapped to standard IT regulations.
2. Alerting and user behaviour analytics: Configurable alerts and behaviour profiling help flag unusual access patterns or risky changes for further review.
3. Recent coverage for hybrid environments: Newer releases add features like attack-surface analysis for GPOs and Azure Intune activity monitoring, which matter as environments move beyond on-prem AD.
   

Advantages of ADAudit Plus	Disadvantages of ADAudit Plus
Strong depth for AD and Windows auditing, with granular event trails that satisfy many IT audit requests	Does not manage policies, risks, vendors, or multi-framework control mapping
Preconfigured IT-compliance reports reduce manual effort for SOX/PCI-style evidence packs	Navigation across many reports and advanced setups (e.g., high availability) can be complex
Reviewers praise solid reporting, breadth, and proper file-server visibility	Integrations beyond the Microsoft stack are limited compared with modern GRC platforms

Who’s it for: Mid-market organizations with a significant Windows/AD footprint that need credible, detailed AD evidence for audits and investigations, but plan to run broader compliance workflows in other tools.

Pricing: Licensed by servers/domain controllers and add-ons, with subscriptions generally in the low-to-mid four figures annually for smaller environments; all deals are quote-based.

4. VComply

VComply is a cloud-based GRC suite that replaces spreadsheet-driven governance and compliance with structured responsibilities, workflows, and dashboards. It’s framed around governance leaders who want a single place to track obligations, risks, and audits using an EVAS (Entrust, Verify, Analyze, Sustain) model rather than just a SOC 2 checklist tool.

Top features

1. GRC modules with audit and assurance: Compliance, risk, policy, and audit modules that share a standard data model, with pre-loaded framework libraries and the ability to map responsibilities to owners and deadlines.
2. Workroom and tasking: A collaborative workspace where teams and auditors can upload evidence, comment, and track tasks, with rules for mandatory attachments, reminders, and escalation on failure.
3. Dashboards and analytics: Role-based dashboards and reports that show compliance status, overdue obligations, and risk heatmaps across locations.

Advantages of VComply	Disadvantages of VComply
Intuitive interface and helpful implementation support once the system is configured	Fewer deep integrations for automated evidence collection
Multi-module design allows you to start with compliance and add risk/audit as the program matures	Analytics and custom reporting are capable, but can demand thoughtful setup to be genuinely useful
Fast setup and implementation

Who’s it for: Compliance, risk, and legal teams in mid-market organizations who want a structured system of record for obligations, risks, and audits, and are comfortable building some workflows and content themselves.

Pricing: Quote-based, typically mid-market SaaS pricing.

5. MasterControl

MasterControl is a quality and compliance platform that serves regulated industries, including pharmaceuticals, medical technology, and food. It combines document control, training, deviations, CAPA, supplier management, and audit management in a validated environment designed to withstand regulatory scrutiny.

Top features

1. Closed-loop eQMS: Document management, training, deviations, CAPA, and change control connected into one system so audit findings can be traced back to underlying quality records.
2. Integrated audit workflows: Support for planning, executing, and tracking audits alongside quality events, with audit trails that satisfy GxP and 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.
3. Validated cloud delivery: Built-in support for system validation, upgrades, and change control so regulated teams can stay compliant through product updates and lifecycle changes.

Advantages of MasterControl	Disadvantages of MasterControl
Strong match for regulated quality and regulatory inspections, where audit evidence is tightly linked to QMS records	Complex or non-intuitive for new or occasional users, with some workflows requiring many steps.
Robust document control, training management, and audit traceability	Implementation and configuration typically take months and require significant internal and vendor effort
Cloud versions have improved performance and reduced some admin overhead compared with on-prem deployments

Who’s it for: Mid-market to enterprise organizations in life sciences and other heavily regulated industries where QMS and audit readiness are the main drivers, not just IT/security compliance.

Pricing: Quote-based and typically aligns with enterprise QMS / GRC budgets.

6. Symbiant

Symbiant is a modular GRC and audit platform originating in the UK, aimed at organizations that want connected risk, compliance, and audit tracking without enterprise-grade licence costs. It emphasises flexibility, low per-module pricing, and optional AI help for lean teams.

Top features

1. Modular GRC and audit apps: Risk registers, compliance management, audit planning, issue tracking, questionnaires, and incident reporting can be enabled as needed, all sharing a single data model.
2. Action and issue tracking: Centralized tracking for audit findings, risk treatments, and control actions with owners, due dates, and complete history.
3. AI assistant: An AI helper trained on GRC topics to summarize content, surface issues, and link related records.

Advantages of Symbiant	Disadvantages of Symbiant
Low starting price with unlimited users per module	Fewer “out-of-the-box” integrations than global GRC brands; some connections may need manual work or generic connectors
Highly configurable, making it easier to adapt fields, workflows, and reports to different organizations without custom development	Dated UI
Cloud versions have improved performance and reduced some admin overhead compared with on-prem deployments	Automated cloud and security evidence collection is relatively light

Who’s it for: SMEs and mid-market organizations, especially in the UK/EU, that want one configurable place for risks, audits, and compliance issues, and value affordability over deep technical integrations.

Pricing: Modules generally start at around £100/month, with “starter packs” priced at around £300/month, including multiple modules and user seats, plus a one-off setup fee.

7. AuditBoard

AuditBoard is a cloud platform centered on audit, SOX, and broader connected-risk workflows for mid-to-large enterprises. It integrates SOX, internal audit, risk, and compliance into a shared data model with robust reporting and has recently added enhanced AI support across modules.

Top features

1. Connected controls and workpapers: Controls, tests, issues, and evidence are managed in one system, with SOX, internal audit, and IT risk applications built on the same core.
2. Risk-based auditing and dashboards: Risk and compliance data can inform audit planning and status dashboards for leadership, enhancing visibility across programs.
3. AI-supported audit workflows: New AI features summarize workpapers, assist in drafting findings, and aid in scoping and sampling, targeting productivity gains for audit teams.
   

Advantages of AuditBoard	Disadvantages of AuditBoard
Modern interface and usability	Implementation and configuration for multi-framework setups often take several months and demand a dedicated team
Strong breadth across audit, SOX, risk, and compliance	Complex modules and advanced configuration require vendor or services support, which adds cost
Cloud versions have improved performance and reduced some admin overhead compared with on-prem deployments

Who’s it for: Mature internal audit and risk functions in mid-to-large enterprises that want to centralize SOX, internal audit, and risk work on a single connected platform and can support enterprise-style implementations.

Pricing: Not publicly listed; typically, enterprise deals with custom pricing.

8. Donesafe (HSI Donesafe)

Donesafe is an EHS and compliance platform that consolidates safety incidents, audits, inspections, and obligations into one system. It is designed for organizations that prioritize safety and operational audits, seeking configurable workflows across multiple safety and compliance domains.

Top features

1. Audit and inspection management: Configure audit templates, schedule inspections, and track status, findings, and corrective actions across sites.
2. Broader EHS modules: Incident management, hazard tracking, contractor onboarding, chemical management, and more live alongside audits for a unified safety record.
3. Configurable workflows and forms: A no-code approach lets admins tailor forms, fields, and automation to their own processes.

Advantages of Donesafe	Disadvantages of Donesafe
Extremely configurable	Back-end configuration is complex
Front-end is seen as user-friendly and straightforward for field staff	eLearning and mobile apps are seen as weaker than the core platform
Good dashboards and real-time visibility across safety/compliance data	Some feedback about slow/limited support or delayed responses

Who’s it for: EHS, operations, and risk teams in sectors like manufacturing, construction, and logistics that need one system for safety audits, inspections, incidents, and compliance tasks.

Pricing: Fully quote-based.

9. SafetyCulture

SafetyCulture (formerly iAuditor) is a mobile-first inspection and audit tool widely used for frontline safety, quality, and operational checks, rather than full GRC. The core idea is to turn paper checklists into digital templates that teams can use on phones and tablets, with centralized results and follow-up actions.

Top features

1. Template-based audits and forms: Teams can build or reuse checklists, including photos and signatures, to standardise how inspections are carried out in the field.
2. Mobile apps with offline support: Inspectors can work on devices in low-connectivity environments and sync results later.
3. Actions and dashboards: Audit findings can be converted into actionable steps, and dashboards help track completion and identify trends across sites.
   

Advantages of SafetyCulture	Disadvantages of SafetyCulture
Highly customizable templates and forms; works across many industries	Steep(er) learning curve for advanced features and complex workflows
Real-time data, photos, and reporting/analytics are frequently praised	Limited or clunky integrations and some reporting quirks
Very easy to use for inspections/audits on mobile; replaces paper checklists	Can feel complex/overwhelming for smaller teams

Who’s it for: Operations, safety, and quality teams that primarily need digital checklists and inspections at scale, not a full GRC stack.

Pricing: Free for small teams, with paid per-user plans for additional features, pricing is publicly listed on SafetyCulture’s site.

10. AssurX

AssurX is an enterprise-quality and compliance platform used in regulated sectors, including energy, medical devices, and manufacturing. It provides an EQMS backbone (complaints, CAPA, change control, audits, and more) with a focus on configurability and multi-site deployments.

Top features

1. CATSWeb EQMS: A suite covering complaints, CAPA, deviations, audits, change control, and related processes in one environment.
2. Audit management: Tools for planning, executing, and tracking audits and associated findings, with detailed record histories and traceability.
3. Configurable workflows: organizations can adapt forms, routing, and automation to their own processes rather than conforming to fixed templates.
   

Advantages of AssurX	Disadvantages of AssurX
Simple and easy to use once configured	The interface in the admin/management area is seen as confusing or clunky
Very configurable/customizable (CATSWeb) and suited to regulated industries	Integrations and reporting configuration can require specialist skills or vendor help
Strong for audit/complaints management and regulatory reporting

Who’s it for: Regulated mid-large organizations that want a configurable EQMS with integrated audit management and are prepared to invest in configuration and ongoing administration.

Pricing: Quote-only, with typical deployments priced as enterprise software (multi-site and multi-module projects rather than small subscriptions).

11. MetricStream

MetricStream Internal Audit Management is part of MetricStream’s broader M7 GRC platform, designed for organizations seeking risk-based internal audit capabilities integrated with enterprise risk and control data. It is geared more to internal audit offices in larger organizations than to small teams running a single SOC 2.

Top features

1. Risk-based audit planning: Links audits to enterprise risks and controls, helping teams prioritise work on higher-impact areas.
2. End-to-end audit workflows: Supports planning, fieldwork, workpapers, issue tracking, and action plans with workflow and approvals.
3. Dashboards and reporting: Provides dashboards and reports to track audit status, issues, and trends across business units.
   

Advantages of MetricStream	Disadvantages of MetricStream
Keeps workpapers and audit workflow in one place, making audits more structured	Difficulty making changes once projects are set up
Integrates internal audit into a wider GRC platform, which can be attractive for organizations standardising on a single vendor	Implementation and configuration effort can be significant
Supports complex organizational structures and multi-entity audit programmes.	Can feel complex/overwhelming for smaller teams

Who’s it for: Larger organizations with a formal internal audit function that already use or are considering MetricStream for wider GRC and want internal audit aligned with that ecosystem.

Pricing: Not disclosed publicly; typically sold as part of MetricStream’s enterprise GRC deals with custom commercial terms.

Key Features to Look Out for in Compliance Audit Software

You’ve shortlisted the tools; now pressure-test them on the capabilities that actually change audit outcomes. The sequence below follows a real audit lifecycle, from collecting defensible evidence to closing findings and answering security questionnaires.

1. Evidence from the source, in one system

Audits move faster when proof comes directly from your systems of record and lives alongside the control and test it supports. You should see:

• Integrations to cloud, identity, HRIS, ticketing, code, and endpoint tools that pull verifiable evidence on a schedule
• A central repository with version history, provenance, and retention
• Evidence linked to controls, tests, findings, and the specific audit workpaper

2. Continuous control monitoring (CCM) that prevents last-minute scrambles

Point-in-time checks create fire drills; CCM keeps control of health current and surface issues when they appear, not during fieldwork.

• Scheduled and event-driven checks with clear pass/fail status
• Drift alerts that assign owners, due dates, and SLAs automatically
• Auto-refresh of evidence so auditors don’t chase screenshots

3. An auditor workspace that reduces email

Auditors should self-serve evidence, leave comments, and track findings in one centralized location, rather than juggling multiple threads and shared drives. (Sprinto includes a shared auditor dashboard that supports scoped access, requests, and remediation tracking.)

• Read-only, scoped access to the exact artifacts auditors need
• Request lists with comments, attachments, and status
• Findings, remediation, and retest tracked to closure

4. Findings and CAPA that actually close gaps

A good platform moves an issue from detection to a verified fix without relying on side systems or spreadsheets.

• Owners, due dates, escalations, and reminders
• Linked evidence and retest results to prove closure
• Findings, aging, and trends to prioritize where to act next

5. Multi-framework mapping and evidence reuse

If you run more than one standard, the software should eliminate duplicate work by reusing controls and artifacts across audits.

• One control (e.g., MFA for admins) mapped to many requirements (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR)
• A single piece of evidence referenced across multiple frameworks
• Gap views that span frameworks, so nothing gets missed

6. Reporting people actually use

Executives, audit owners, and control owners need fast, accurate views of their security posture and progress, without having to export to a spreadsheet first.

• Readiness by audit, entity, and control
• Open findings with SLA breaches and trend lines
• Exports/APIs for board packets and ad-hoc analysis

7. AI that works where you work

Generic chatbots don’t help during fieldwork; you want contextual AI that understands the record you’re viewing and your actual data.

• In-record Q&A on policies, risks, vendors, or evidence (e.g., “Summarize this policy for auditors”)
• Automatic mapping of controls to frameworks, policies, and risks to reduce repetitive scoping
• Evidence Gap Analysis that flags missing or stale artifacts during upload—before auditors do
• Suggested answers for questionnaires with human approval and auditability

8. Security questionnaires and vendor due diligence, without a parallel process

If sales are blocked due to security reviews, your audit platform should streamline questionnaires and document reviews within the same system to facilitate efficient workflow.

• Import questionnaires from spreadsheets and portals; reuse approved answers
• AI-suggested responses and a browser helper for web portals; multi-language support for non-English requests
• Document analysis to surface key risks in vendor policies and reports

9. Configurability and no-code automation you can own

Mid-market teams shouldn’t wait for engineering to adapt workflows or automate routine reviews.

• Opinionated templates you can tailor without pro-services
• No-code automations for tasks like risk digests, pentest summaries, or vendor gap notes
• Reusable rules you can publish to teams where they already work

10. Governance that stands up in an audit

Strong access control and a defensible trail of who changed what—and when—underpin credible audits.

• Role-based permissions down to artifact/control level
• Immutable activity logs and approval trails
• Data residency, retention, and secure evidence storage

How to validate in a demo

Ask the vendor to perform three tasks live: pull objective evidence from an integration, let a failed check become a finding with an SLA, retest, and complete an auditor request end-to-end within the workspace. If all three feel seamless, you’re evaluating the right kind of compliance audit software.

How much does a compliance audit software cost on average?

The cost of compliance audit management software can range from $10 per month to $10,000. This price range is quite extensive, as it is a rough estimate. 

It is not possible to put a fixed price tag on your compliance auditing software, as a lot goes into the final cost beyond what may appear initially. Things like: 

• Location of operation
• Number of employees
• Number of compliance frameworks
• Complexity of your infrastructure
• The features or capabilities you chose 
• The pricing module you opted for

– all these add up to the final number.Nevertheless, you can use the cost calculator we developed for you to estimate the cost of your compliance audit management software. 

Benefits of using a compliance audit software

Compliance auditing software helps you manage end-to-end processes, meet deadlines without missing a beat, and automate manual-heavy activities. Using compliance software, you can: 

1. Always‑current, source‑based evidence: Proof stays fresh and defensible
2. Predictable audits: A self‑serve auditor portal reduces email and shortens fieldwork
3. No duplicate work: Cross‑mapping reuses controls, tests, and policies across frameworks
4. Faster policy lifecycle: Prebuilt libraries, reviews, approvals, acknowledgments, and AI summaries
5. Signal over noise: Dashboards show readiness by area, owners, due dates, and risk
6. Faster questionnaires & vendor reviews: Import any format, draft answers, analyze vendor docs, and track risk

Achieve Compliance with Sprinto

Sprinto is a modern, integrations‑rich compliance platform built for mid‑market SaaS and technology teams that run recurring audits and expand frameworks over time. It combines continuous control monitoring, auditor-friendly workflows, and AI-assisted mapping and questionnaires to reduce manual effort and keep you always ready.

• Automated evidence and  control checks across your stack
• Auditor workspace for requests, workpapers, findings, and retests
• Evidence reuse across frameworks; policy and training fully tracked
• Security questionnaires answered from your live posture; vendor due diligence built in

G2 has repeatedly recognized Sprinto as a Leader in Security Compliance and a top performer in user adoption, ROI, Usability, and Ease of Implementation.

Achieve airtight security compliance to consolidate risk, run the fully automated checks, and map entity-level controls. Get in touch with us now to learn more.

FAQs