Blog
Blogs
Top 6 Vanta Competitors & Alternatives – Detailed Comparison

Top 6 Vanta Competitors & Alternatives – Detailed Comparison

Vanta often serves as the first stop for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 readiness. But many teams outgrow it when they want tighter workflow control, more flexible reporting, and pricing that remains predictable as frameworks and users increase. This comparison examines six Vanta alternatives and shows how they differ across automation depth, integrations, multi-framework scale, audit workflows, and support.

Top 6 Vanta alternatives in 2026:
1. Sprinto
2. Drata
3. Secureframe
4. Hyperproof
5. Thoropass
6. Strike Graph

If you’re evaluating compliance and security automation tools, chances are you’ve come across Vanta. As one of the early entrants in this space, Vanta has built an impressive customer base. . But bigger doesn’t necessarily mean better – with more competitors offering comparable features (and in some cases stronger customization or pricing), your search for the best solution shouldn’t end at Vanta.

This guide breaks down the top alternatives, highlighting their strengths, shortcomings, and the features that matter most for your compliance journey.
We’ve summarized insights from genuine user reviews and supplemented them with publicly available product information, so you can make an informed decision by the end.

What is Vanta?

Vanta is an automated security and compliance platform that helps companies prepare for certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA. It continuously monitors systems, identifies risks, and simplifies audit readiness. Vanta reduces manual work and accelerates compliance for fast-growing SaaS and cloud-based businesses.

Vanta in a nutshell:

vanta review

What is Vanta’s pricing model?

Vanta’s pricing is quote-based and is often reported to start around $7,500, varying by factors like frameworks, headcount, and complexity.. You can request a custom quote for more details. 

In general, the pricing structure for security compliance tools usually depend on multiple factors. These include:

  1. Number of employees
  2. Location of operation
  3. Number of frameworks selected
  4. Existing processes and tools
  5. Contract term duration
Vanta scales cost. Sprinto scales your compliance.

Get transparent pricing now. Talk to experts →

Why look for Vanta alternatives?

Despite being the earliest driver in the compliance market, Vanta’s solution does not square up to some of its core competitors. The platform is built for speed and simplicity, but this comes at a cost. It offers limited customization, and lacks the flexibility to track edge cases or tailor workflows by role or business unit.

Navigation is unintuitive and often requires multiple clicks to complete simple tasks, creating friction in daily workflows.

Reporting is limited, offering only basic dashboards with minimal flexibility to customize or drill into insights.

The platform struggles with scale, as bulk actions frequently fail or need to be repeated, turning routine processes into time-consuming manual work.
On top of that, Vanta’s pricing can escalate quickly with extra charges for additional frameworks, users, or features. While its UI is clean and onboarding is quick, users often find themselves doing more manual work than expected, with little support to adapt the platform to their specific needs.

All in all, customers point to a few recurring drawbacks in day-to-day use. Here’s what we gathered from G2 reviews. For a more detailed breakdown of these issues, you can check out our honest Vanta review.

  • Does not fully support custom application integration tasks like evidence collection, making it a manual process
  • Offers generic best practices and recommendations that fail to cater to unique business needs
  • The solution could be more cost-effective – new feature releases are chargeable and stretch the budget
  • Over-indexed for simplicity, the platform lacks the level of granularity to drive smoother audits
  • Some users would like more modular program setup and more granular task delegation, especially when running SOC 2.
  • Some users found the learning curve steep and overwhelming without technical assistance
Vanta works for today. Sprinto prepares you for tomorrow.

Choose the platform built to scale → Book a demo

6 Best Vanta Alternatives

Are you looking for a similar product to Vanta? Here are the top Vanta competitors:

PlatformBest for (company size and industry)Ideal for (teams and roles)
SprintoCloud-native startups and hyper-growth SaaS companies aiming for fast, cost-efficient compliance at scaleSecurity, engineering, and GRC teams seeking AI-powered automation, deep integrations, and scalable frameworks
Drata Growth-stage to enterprise companies needing continuous compliance and decent GRC capabilitiesDevOps-heavy security teams that want real-time monitoring and control
SecureframeEarly-stage to mid-sized tech companies looking for quick compliance wins with minimal frictionFounders and ops teams with limited in-house expertise needing a plug-and-play compliance tool
HyperproofMid-market to enterprise businesses with layered compliance needs and multi-framework requirementsGRC and risk leaders needing structured workflows and centralized audit management
ThoropassSMBs and growing teams that want a blend of automation and hands-on support from compliance specialistsTeams new to compliance looking for expert guidance during the audit process
Strike GraphStartups and SMBs looking to get audit-ready fast without deep compliance expertiseTeams that want simple UI, prebuilt templates, and streamlined workflows without heavy customization needs

1. Sprinto 

Sprinto is designed to facilitate AI-powered autonomous compliance across cloud-hosted SaaS companies. Powered by Sprinto AI’s AI-ready data layer and hyper-contextual agents, it maps framework requirements, runs continuous checks, consolidates risks, and provides real-time compliance intelligence from a centralized dashboard.

The platform enables teams to scale compliance and audit readiness without consuming engineering bandwidth, using AI to automate tedious tasks, detect issues proactively, and guide corrective actions.

All features, strengths, and capabilities considered, Sprinto AI is one of the strongest next-generation alternatives to Vanta, offering deeper automation, wider AI coverage, and more flexible customization.

Key Features

  • AI-powered continuous compliance monitoring and evidence automation.
  • Multi-framework compliance support (including custom frameworks).
  • Audit readiness dashboards and structured evidence workflows.
  • Vendor risk workflows and vendor/security questionnaire automation.
  • No-code automation for compliance workflows (internal tasks, reviews, evidence routing).
  • Policy, risk, and control management built for scale (roles, teams, growing org structures).

Pros 

  • Sprinto offers complete, auditor-friendly programs with dashboards that allow users to collect, edit, and manage evidence cleanly and consistently.
  • Sprinto AI flags non-compliant activities with detailed context such as nature of risk, criticality, recommended actions, and affected systems, helping teams resolve issues proactively.
  • Sprinto provides out-of-the-box policy templates, guidance, and recommendations to help companies scale quickly and confidently.
  • You can upload any custom framework and Sprinto AI automatically maps your controls to each requirement, laying the foundation for continuous monitoring.
  • Teams can now create custom AI automations with no code, allowing them to analyze policies, generate risk summaries, evaluate vendor questionnaires, or run custom workflows directly inside Sprinto.
  • Vendor records automatically classify data exposure (high/medium/low risk). AI extracts insights from vendor documents and suggests due diligence findings instantly.
  • Evidence gap analysis flags missed or outdated evidence.

Cons

  • Sprinto is optimized for SaaS/cloud-native environments and may not be ideal for on-premise infrastructure-heavy organizations.
  • The platform does not rely on generic, one-size-fits-all templates

Pricing

  • Custom quote (typically annual) based on frameworks, organization complexity, and program scope
  • Positioned as transparent and scalable, as teams add frameworks and entities

Who should choose Sprinto over Vanta?

Choose Sprinto over Vanta if:

  • You’re planning to scale to multiple frameworks (or multiple entities) and want fewer tool limits as complexity increases.
  • You want deeper automation across the full GRC lifecycle, and not just evidence collection (risk, vendors, policy workflows, audit execution).
  • You need customizable workflows by team, role, or business unit as your organization structure grows.
  • You want a platform that can handle bulk actions and complex program ownership without creating day-to-day friction.

G2 rating: 4.8/5 (1,500+ reviews)

Giift streamlined security ops across 14 entities following ISO 27001 implementation with Sprinto. Learn more about our process.

2. Drata

Drata automates security and compliance to help businesses meet regulatory framework requirements for SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO, and more.

It integrates with popular cloud services to streamline end-to-end compliance workflows like evidence collection, control monitoring, policy workflows, and audit readiness.

drata review

Key Features

  • Continuous monitoring and automated control evidence collection through integrations.
  • Automated monitors to validate security requirements (alerts for failures).
  • Centralized compliance dashboard for controls, tasks, and audit readiness.
  • Access/user management workflows (reviews, permissions tracking).
  • Evidence collection tooling designed for ongoing readiness vs. one-time audits.

Pros 

  • Monitors the IT environment and triggers alerts based on harmful activities and user behavior.
  • Enables users to create, edit, and track access privileges. Helps teams manage access and support governance practices like tracking and encryption controls.
  • Users can create and streamline workflows related to ticketing and services. IT teams can set security and data governance-related policies.
  • The centralized dashboard offers insightful data and enables users to implement custom policies for risk and asset management.

Cons

  • Document and policy management features are clunky and prevent a seamless overall experience 
  • Does not allow users to edit evidence once uploaded, creating duplicate evidence in the system
  • Lack of transparency on the pricing model during the sales stage can create post purchase surprises. For example, users charged for add-on features faced budgeting issues. 
  • Lacks the capability to facilitate tiered escalation for critical and failing checks.

Who should choose Drata over Vanta?

Choose Drata over Vanta if:

  • Your security program is DevOps-heavy, and you want monitoring/alerts that map closely to your technical controls.
  • You care most about continuous control monitoring and always-on readiness.
  • You’re comfortable with a more technical implementation and want strong integration-driven automation.

G2 rating: 4.8/5 (1,100+ reviews)

3. Secureframe

Secureframe helps businesses scale their SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, and NIST compliance processes. Its capabilities include scanning cloud infrastructure for vulnerabilities, automated evidence collection, vendor workflows, employee training support, and audit readiness tracking.

Key Features

  • Guided, plug-and-play compliance workflows for fast time-to-audit.
  • Automated evidence collection through integrations (cloud, identity, and ticketing).
  • Cross-framework control mapping to reduce duplicate work.
  • Trust center and security questionnaire workflows to support GTM.
  • Central dashboard for controls, tasks, audit readiness, and reporting.

Pros

  • Helps reduce data-loss risk by securely storing on-premise or adjacent cloud-based. Analyses suspicious data to provide insights into security protocols and authentication
  • Tracks, triages, and assigns risks to owners from a single dashboard to improve visibility and accountability
  • The report generator collects, tracks, and consolidates data such as passing and failing controls to ensure compliance
  • Continuously monitors compliance status in real-time to offer actionable insights into security and compliance fails.

Cons

  • Compliance assessments for complex systems like Google Cloud, Jira, and GitHub require manual intervention to meet the required configuration
  • Does not offer granular, actionable, deep insight into failing tests. Resolution steps clack clarity
  • Some users found that integration with common cloud services is not smooth and often buggy

Pricing

  • Custom quote (typically annual), with modules varying by plan.
  • See if you can validate which add-ons/modules are included in your plan upfront.

Who should choose Secureframe over Vanta?

  • You want fast compliance wins with a highly guided experience and minimal operational overhead.
  • Your priority is a clean, easy-to-use workflow for quickly getting audit-ready.
  • You want strong support for trust center and security questionnaire flows to accelerate deals while maintaining compliance.

G2 rating: 4.7/5 (700+ reviews)

4. Hyperproof

Hyperproof, a risk and compliance management platform, helps security teams stay on top of frameworks like SOC 2, ISO, and NIST CSF. 

The solution integrates with cloud services to operationalize risk management, automate workflows, collect evidence, and prepare for audits. Users can map controls across frameworks and collaborate with stakeholders from a centralized dashboard. 

Key Features

  • Compliance operations workspace (tasks, controls, audit readiness tracking).
  • Centralized evidence management and automated reminders.
  • Cross-framework mapping and program-level reporting.
  • Workflow automation and collaboration for multi-stakeholder compliance.
  • Built for layered compliance programs (multiple frameworks and teams).
hyperproof review

Pros

  • Offers a bundled solution containing training and learning materials for new and existing employees.
  • The intuitive Ui enables users to configure the platform without guidance from the technical support team.
  • Identifies and triages risks into human, technical, and external categories or based on framework specific requirements. 

Cons

  • Despite being intuitive, the UI can be slow and buggy according to some users, limiting the capabilities to perform certain functions with ease.
  • The overall solution needs to be more comprehensive and granular to allow users to perform custom actions.  
  • Does not allow auditors to upload, download, or change request status in specific cases.
  • Limited automation capabilities for the reporting function require manual intervention. 

Pricing

  • Custom quote (often suited for mid-market/enterprise programs).
  • Pricing tends to reflect broader compliance ops capabilities vs. lightweight evidence tools.

Who should choose Hyperproof over Vanta?

Choose Hyperproof over Vanta if:

  • You have a program-heavy compliance function (GRC-led) with many stakeholders and workflows.
  • You need structured compliance operations (tasks, program reporting, cross-framework management) beyond evidence automation.
  • You’re managing compliance across multiple teams and want stronger centralized governance.

G2 rating: 4.5/5 (190+ reviews)

5. Thoropass 

Thoropass (previously known as Laika) integrates with existing processes to facilitate continuous monitoring, pass audits easily, and comply with various infosec and privacy frameworks. It offers a seamless auditing experience, automates compliance-related tasks from a single dashboard, and streamlines due diligence processes

Key Features

  • Evidence automation and continuous monitoring.
  • Policy workflows and audit readiness tracking.
  • Risk assessment and management support.
  • Security questionnaire automation.
  • Option for integrated audit services (for teams who want more hands-on support).
thoropass review

Pros

  • IT teams can set custom policies for data governance, role based access, and manage access privileges.
  • Monitors the IT environment and generates reports based on violations or malicious behavior
  • Helps to pass and manage SOC 2 compliance with little effort. 

Cons

  • Does not offer a vast range of options for integration options. The integration system is clunky and often buggy. 
  • The pre-built templates are suitable for large organizations. Users from smaller businesses reported it to be overkill. 
  • The UI is not clean and lacks the required level of granularity.

Pricing

  • Custom quote (often bundles software and services).
  • Best fit when you value expert guidance, not just tooling.

Who should choose Thoropass over Vanta?

Choose Thoropass over Vanta if:

  • You’re new to compliance and want more hands-on support than a self-serve platform typically provides.
  • You prefer a blend of automation and expert guidance through the audit process.
  • You want a vendor that can support both the platform and the compliance execution motion.

G2 rating: 4.7/5 (550+ reviews)

Get a personalized walkthrough based on your industry, team size, and frameworks →

6. Strike Graph

Strike Graph offers compliance operations and certification solutions to help organizations complete their audit processes faster. It’s positioned as a straightforward platform to manage controls, evidence, risks, and frameworks, with published pricing options

Key Features

  • Compliance workspace for risks, controls, evidence, and program progress.
  • AI security assistant and audit workbook export (plan-dependent).
  • Cross-framework mappings and integrations (50+ cloud integrations listed).
  • Structured workflows for questionnaires, action items, and monitoring (plan-dependent)

Pros

  • Easy to use and intuitive user interface speeds up the onboarding process. The simplicity and well thought out navigation system facilitates a seamless experience.
  • Organizes critical data in an easy to understand format that enables teams to quickly view outstanding tasks and collaborate with functions 
  • Users found the evidence uploading system particularly useful as the platform offers guidance to link evidence to the right control to satisfy a certification requirement 
  • Users appreciated the customer success team for their guidance and promptness in resolving issues

Cons

  • Lacks integration for important tools like Jira, GitHub, and Atlassian 
  • The platform does not allow users to attach more than one piece of evidence to a control
  • The evidence collection process is not fully automated. Customer reported the need for manual intervention for capturing screenshots

Pricing

  • Launch: Free (foundation plan)
  • Certify: starts at $9,000/year
  • Scale: starts at $18,000/year
  • Enterprise: starts at $27,000/year
  • Additional frameworks and add-ons may be priced separately

Who should choose Strike Graph over Vanta?

Choose Strike Graph over Vanta if:

  • You value transparent, published pricing and want to avoid unclear packaging.
  • You want a simple, structured workspace for controls, evidence, and risks with minimal customization.
  • You’re optimizing for speed to audit readiness and prefer guided templates/workbooks.

G2 rating: 4.7/5 (170+ reviews)

We add the sass in SaaS

We hope this helped you finalize your compliance partner. We know the skepticism that comes with choosing and onboarding a new vendor. Buyer remorse is real, and we don’t want you to regret it afterward.

So if you are not sure, let our compliance experts help you. Let us help you understand how you can leverage Sprinto to meet your needs. Or how businesses similar to yours used our tool to get excellent results. We go above and beyond to ensure your success by holding your hand throughout the process from start to finish. Get started today to make your life easier!

Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback.

Vanta checks controls. Sprinto understands them. Automate compliance with intelligence →

FAQs

What is the pricing of Vanta?

The pricing of Vanta’s contract is between $7,500 to $100,000 and boils down to a number of factors like employee strength, selected compliance frameworks, existing security posture, and your contract term.

What are the best alternatives to Vanta?

The best alternative is ideally the one that caters best to your specific business needs. A demo usually helps to come to a better decision. However, based on user feedback and functionalities, the best recommended alternatives are Sprinto, Drata, and Secureframe.

What platforms offer deeper automation than Vanta?

Sprinto leads in flexibility. It supports 200+ frameworks out of the box, offers custom framework and control creation, and features programmable monitoring rules, role-based dashboards, and adaptable workflows by business unit.

What is the most flexible compliance automation platform?

Sprinto leads in flexibility. It supports 200+ frameworks and has recently introduced “Infinite Frameworks” through AI-powered mapping, allowing companies to onboard any custom or niche framework within a day. This is complemented by programmable monitoring rules, customizable controls, and role-specific workflows.

Vanta vs Drata vs Sprinto, which is the easiest to implement?

Vanta is quick to set up for simple environments, but the DIY nature adds complexity later. Drata is more technical and better suited for DevOps-heavy teams. Sprinto strikes the balance with fast onboarding and guided support, and AI-powered automation that minimizes lift for engineering and GRC teams alike

Sprinto vs Vanta: How does Sprinto differentiate itself?

Sprinto differentiates with deeper workflow automation and scalability, especially for teams that want to run multiple frameworks, manage exceptions/edge cases cleanly, and operationalize risk, vendor, and audit workflows in one system (not as separate add-ons or manual processes).

Is Sprinto better than Vanta for multi-framework compliance?

If your roadmap includes multi-framework expansion (SOC 2 → ISO → HIPAA → more), Sprinto is purpose-built to scale program structure, evidence workflows, and ownership across teams and business units,  reducing the need to repeat the same work problem that often shows up as programs mature.

Anwita

Anwita

Anwita is a cybersecurity enthusiast and veteran blogger all rolled into one. Her love for everything cybersecurity started her journey into the world compliance. With multiple certifications on cybersecurity under her belt, she aims to simplify complex security related topics for all audiences. She loves to read nonfiction, listen to progressive rock, and watches sitcoms on the weekends.

Tired of fluff GRC and cybersecurity content? Subscribe to our newsletter and get detailed
research & insights curated to help you earn a seat at the table.
single-blog-footer-img