Top 6 Vanta Competitors & Alternatives – Detailed Comparison

If you are looking for a compliance and security automation solution, in all probability, you considered Vanta. Being the first to enter this space, they boast an impressive list of customers. But bigger doesn’t necessarily mean better – with more competitors offering the same and often better features, your search for the best solution should not end at Vanta.

This guide breaks down the top alternatives, highlighting their strengths, shortcomings, and the features that matter most for your compliance journey.
We have compiled data from genuine user reviews to help you make an informed decision by the end!

What is Vanta?

Vanta is an automated security and compliance platform that helps companies prepare for certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA. It continuously monitors systems, identifies risks, and simplifies audit readiness. Vanta reduces manual work and accelerates compliance for fast-growing SaaS and cloud-based businesses.

Vanta in a nutshell:

What is Vanta’s pricing model?

Vanta’s pricing module starts from $7,500 and can be customized depending on the complexity of your requirements. You can request a custom quote for more details. 

In general, the pricing structure for security compliance tools usually depend on multiple factors. These include:

1. Number of employees
2. Location of operation
3. Number of frameworks selected
4. Existing processes and tools
5. Contract term duration

Why look for Vanta alternatives?

Despite being the earliest driver in the compliance market, Vanta’s solution does not square up to some of its core competitors. The platform is built for speed and simplicity, but this comes at a cost. It offers limited customization, and lacks the flexibility to track edge cases or tailor workflows by role or business unit.

Navigation is unintuitive and often requires multiple clicks to complete simple tasks, creating friction in daily workflows.

Reporting is limited, offering only basic dashboards with minimal flexibility to customize or drill into insights.

The platform struggles with scale, as bulk actions frequently fail or need to be repeated, turning routine processes into time-consuming manual work.
On top of that, Vanta’s pricing can escalate quickly with extra charges for additional frameworks, users, or features. While its UI is clean and onboarding is quick, users often find themselves doing more manual work than expected, with little support to adapt the platform to their specific needs.

All in all, customers found some minor drawbacks with the product. Here’s what we gathered from G2 reviews. For a more detailed breakdown of these issues, you can check out our honest Vanta review.

• Does not fully support custom application integration tasks like evidence collection, making it a manual process
• Offers generic best practices and recommendations that fail to cater to unique business needs
• The solution could be more cost-effective – new feature releases are chargeable and stretch the budget
• Over-indexed for simplicity, the platform lacks the level of granularity to drive smoother audits
• The platform lacks modularity, rendering it ineffective to transfer tasks for compliance programs like SOC 2
• Some users found the learning curve steep and overwhelming without technical assistance

6 Best Vanta Alternatives

Are you looking for a similar product to Vanta? Here are the top Vanta competitors:

Platform	Best for (company size and industry)	Ideal for (teams and roles)
Sprinto	Cloud-native startups and hyper-growth SaaS companies aiming for fast, cost-efficient compliance at scale	Security, engineering, and GRC teams seeking AI-powered automation, deep integrations, and scalable frameworks
Drata	Growth-stage to enterprise companies needing continuous compliance and decent GRC capabilities	DevOps-heavy security teams that want real-time monitoring and control
Secureframe	Early-stage to mid-sized tech companies looking for quick compliance wins with minimal friction	Founders and ops teams with limited in-house expertise needing a plug-and-play compliance tool
Hyperproof	Mid-market to enterprise businesses with layered compliance needs and multi-framework requirements	GRC and risk leaders needing structured workflows and centralized audit management
Thoropass	SMBs and growing teams that want a blend of automation and hands-on support from compliance specialists	Teams new to compliance looking for expert guidance during the audit process
Strike Graph	Startups and SMBs looking to get audit-ready fast without deep compliance expertise	Teams that want simple UI, prebuilt templates, and streamlined workflows without heavy customization needs

1. Sprinto 

Sprinto is designed to facilitate AI-powered autonomous compliance across cloud-hosted SaaS companies.

Powered by Sprinto AI’s AI-ready data layer and hyper-contextual agents, it maps framework requirements, runs continuous checks, consolidates risks, and provides real-time compliance intelligence from a centralized dashboard.

The platform enables teams to scale compliance and audit readiness without consuming engineering bandwidth, using AI to automate tedious tasks, detect issues proactively, and guide corrective actions.

All features, strengths, and capabilities considered, Sprinto AI is one of the strongest next-generation alternatives to Vanta, offering deeper automation, wider AI coverage, and more flexible customization.

Pros 

• Sprinto offers complete, auditor-friendly programs with dashboards that allow users to collect, edit, and manage evidence cleanly and consistently.
• Sprinto AI flags non-compliant activities with detailed context such as nature of risk, criticality, recommended actions, and affected systems, helping teams resolve issues proactively.
• Sprinto provides out-of-the-box policy templates, guidance, and recommendations to help companies scale quickly and confidently.
• You can upload any custom framework and Sprinto AI automatically maps your controls to each requirement, laying the foundation for continuous monitoring.
• Teams can now create custom AI automations with no code, allowing them to analyze policies, generate risk summaries, evaluate vendor questionnaires, or run custom workflows directly inside Sprinto.
• Vendor records automatically classify data exposure (high/medium/low risk). AI extracts insights from vendor documents and suggests due diligence findings instantly.
• Evidence gap analysis flags missed or outdated evidence.

Cons:

• Sprinto is optimized for SaaS/cloud-native environments and may not be ideal for on-premise infrastructure-heavy organizations.
• The platform does not rely on generic, one-size-fits-all templates

Why is Sprinto the best possible alternative to Vanta?

Sprinto is the strongest alternative to Vanta because it delivers far deeper, broader, and more customizable AI automation across the entire GRC lifecycle. 

1. More frameworks, more flexibility: Sprinto supports 200+ frameworks and lets you onboard custom ones instantly through its AI-powered Infinite Frameworks capability. While Vanta supports many standard frameworks and offers custom framework creation, its core design focused on speed and simplicity can limit depth when workflows are complex or highly tailored
2. Deeper automation across the board: Sprinto lets you set up no-code AI workflows unique to your business. Vanta’s automation is not as deep and often requires manual intervention.
3. AI built for GRC, not just evidence: Sprinto’s AI powers audits, risk scoring, policy updates, vendor reviews, and scans code repositories for compliance risks, offering significantly broader capabilities than Vanta’s limited AI use cases.
4. Faster implementation: Sprinto offers guided onboarding with certified experts, enabling teams to become audit-ready faster. Vanta is more self-serve, which slows things down for growing teams.
5. Stronger audit readiness: Sprinto includes a dedicated audit dashboard and an internal evidence review prior to audits. Vanta leaves you to manually prepare artifacts.
6. Superior support model: Sprinto offers 24/7 expert support, including a compliance manager to handle auditor interactions. Vanta support is limited to business hours and doesn’t engage in audits.
7. Built for scale: Sprinto handles bulk actions, complex workflows, and growing org structures without friction. Vanta struggles under repetitive tasks and lacks workflow control.
8. Lower total cost of ownership: Sprinto includes features like security training, MDM, and vendor risk management in one flat pricing model. Vanta often requires additional tools and charges for extras.

Giift streamlined security ops across 14 entities following ISO 27001 implementation with Sprinto. Learn more about our process.

2. Drata

Drata automates security and compliance to help businesses meet regulatory framework requirements for SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO, and more.

 It integrates with popular cloud services to streamline end-to-end compliance workflows like evidence collection, control monitoring, data governance, and policy enforcement. 

Pros 

• Monitors the IT environment and triggers alerts based on harmful activities and user behavior
• Enables users to create, edit, and track access privileges. Ensures user access management, data lineage, and data encryption
• Users can create and streamline workflows related to ticketing and services. IT teams can set security and data governance related policies
• The centralized dashboard offers insightful data and enables users to implement custom policies for risk and asset management

Cons

• Document and policy management features are clunky and prevent a seamless overall experience 
• Does not allow users to edit evidence once uploaded, creating duplicate evidence in the system
• Lack of transparency on the pricing model during the sales stage can create post purchase surprises. For example, users charged for add-on features faced budgeting issues. 
• Lacks the capability to facilitate tiered escalation for critical and failing checks.

3. Secureframe

Secureframe helps businesses scale their SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA and NIST compliance processes. Its key capabilities include scanning the cloud infrastructure for vulnerabilities, vendor risk assessment, employee security training, and automated evidence collection. 

Pros

• Prevents data loss by securely storing it on-premise or adjacent cloud base. Analyses suspicious data to provide insights into security protocols and authentication
• Tracks, triages, and assigns risks to owners from a single dashboard to improve visibility and accountability
• The report generator collects, tracks, and consolidates data such as passing and failing controls to ensure compliance
• Continuously monitors compliance status in real-time to offer actionable insights into security and compliance fails.

Cons

• Compliance assessments for complex systems like Google Cloud, Jira, and GitHub require manual intervention to meet the required configuration
• Does not offer granular, actionable, deep insight into failing tests. Resolution steps clack clarity
• Some users found that integration with common cloud services is not smooth and often buggy

4. Hyperproof

Hyperproof, a risk and compliance management platform, helps security teams stay on top of frameworks like SOC 2, ISO, and NIST CSF. 

The solution integrates with cloud services to operationalize risk management, automate workflows, collect evidence, and prepare for audits. Users can map controls across frameworks and collaborate with stakeholders from a centralized dashboard. 

Pros

• Offers a bundled solution containing training and learning materials for new and existing employees.
• The intuitive Ui enables users to configure the platform without guidance from the technical support team.
• Identifies and triages risks into human, technical, and external categories or based on framework specific requirements. 

Cons

• Despite being intuitive, the UI can be slow and buggy according to some users, limiting the capabilities to perform certain functions with ease.
• The overall solution needs to be more comprehensive and granular to allow users to perform custom actions.  
• Does not allow auditors to upload, download, or change request status in specific cases.
• Limited automation capabilities for the reporting function require manual intervention. 

5. Thoropass 

Thoropass (previously known as Laika) integrates with existing processes to facilitate continuous monitoring, pass audits easily, and comply with various infosec and privacy frameworks. It offers a seamless auditing experience, automates compliance-related tasks from a single dashboard, and streamlines due diligence processes.  

Pros

• IT teams can set custom policies for data governance, role based access, and manage access privileges.
• Monitors the IT environment and generates reports based on violations or malicious behavior
• Helps to pass and manage SOC 2 compliance with little effort. 

Cons

• Does not offer a vast range of options for integration options. The integration system is clunky and often buggy. 
• The pre-built templates are suitable for large organizations. Users from smaller businesses reported it to be overkill. 
• The UI is not clean and lacks the required level of granularity.

6. Strike Graph

Strike Graph offers compliance operation and certification solutions to help organizations complete their audit processes faster. Users can build an effective security program to meet compliance requirements, operationalize workflows using automated dashboards, and track compliance progress for multiple frameworks using a single platform. 

Pros

• Easy to use and intuitive user interface speeds up the onboarding process. The simplicity and well thought out navigation system facilitates a seamless experience.
• Organizes critical data in an easy to understand format that enables teams to quickly view outstanding tasks and collaborate with functions 
• Users found the evidence uploading system particularly useful as the platform offers guidance to link evidence to the right control to satisfy a certification requirement 
• Users appreciated the customer success team for their guidance and promptness in resolving issues

Cons

• Lacks integration for important tools like Jira, GitHub, and Atlassian 
• The platform does not allow users to attach more than one piece of evidence to a control
• The evidence collection process is not fully automated. Customer reported the need for manual intervention for capturing screenshots

We add the sass in SaaS

We hope this helped you finalize your compliance partner. We know the skepticism that comes with choosing and onboarding a new vendor. Buyer remorse is real, and we don’t want you to regret it afterward.

So if you are not sure, let our compliance experts help you. Let us help you understand how you can leverage Sprinto to meet your needs. Or how businesses similar to yours used our tool to get excellent results. We go above and beyond to ensure your success by holding your hand throughout the process from start to finish. Get started today to make your life easier!

Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback.

FAQs