Secureframe vs Delve: Features, Trade-offs, and the Better Fit

If you’re looking for compliance tools, you’ve probably stumbled on names like Secureframe and Delve more than once. They’re, no doubt, popular. However, if you peek under the hood, they can be vastly different. 

In this blog, we break down exactly how Securframe and Delve differ, explore what they offer, highlight where they fall short, and help you pick the right one for your

Overview of tools

Secureframe is built for early to mid-stage companies with straightforward compliance needs that want to check the compliance box to unlock better deals.

It helps companies get security certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA with speed and simplicity. It’s built for teams that need to move fast and offers out-of-the-box templates, automated evidence collection, and integrations that reduce manual work.

Delve is built for companies of all sizes but mostly appeals to scale-ups and enterprises. The platform helps companies manage compliance across complex systems using AI agents that monitor risks, update controls, and reduce manual effort.

Instead of relying on checklists, Delve connects to real workflows such as code changes, access reviews, and vendor risk, so teams can stay compliant without slowing down.

Secureframe Vs Delve: Key feature comparison

Let’s tackle the most important aspect of the tools we’re comparing—key features and capabilities.

Here’s how Secureframe and Delve compare across the essentials that matter to your team:

Supported Frameworks

The frameworks that companies like Delve and Secureframe support can be pivotal in meeting multiple compliance standards without duplicating effort. The broader the coverage, the easier it is to expand into new markets or industries.

• Secureframe supports 35+ frameworks, including the standard ones like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI DSS with out-of-the-box templates.
• Delve supports standard frameworks, such as SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR, as well as custom frameworks. While the company claims to support dozens of frameworks, we couldn’t find an actual count.

Verdict: Secureframe supports a greater number of frameworks, but is only suitable when you expect one or two audit engagements a year. Delve is better suited if you have multiple overlapping compliance requirements.

Automation Depth

Automation reduces manual work by handling checks, updates, and workflows without human intervention or oversight. This saves time, reduces error, and keeps you consistently audit-ready.

• Secureframe automates evidence collection and checklist-based tasks through tight integrations. It is especially effective for teams with standard stacks.
• Delve uses AI agents to adapt controls, surface risks, and automate workflows at a deeper level. It helps teams detect issues earlier, respond faster, and maintain compliance without constant manual oversight.

Verdict: Delve offers more adaptive automation. Secureframe is sufficient for simpler environments.

Integrations

The number of integrations a platform supports dictates its ability to connect with external platforms and bring them within the scope of compliance. This powers real-time checks, faster evidence collection, and fewer gaps during audits.

• Secureframe offers 300+ integrations with major cloud and HR tools. It’s ideal for fast plug-and-play setup with broad system coverage.
• Delve supports 100+ integrations and lets you set up custom checks using APIs.

Verdict: Secureframe wins on coverage. Delve is better if you need flexibility over volume.

Risk Management

Risk management is a platform’s ability to identify, score, and mitigate security threats. Strong tools help you avoid potential issues, prioritize efforts, and build trust with auditors.

• Secureframe offers a basic risk register for manually logging, categorizing, and tracking risks. It’s useful for standard risk documentation but limited in dynamic risk handling.
• Delve includes dynamic risk scoring, custom risk workflows, automated risk-control mapping, and the ability to build your risk models across teams.

Verdict: Delve is better for teams that need flexible, automated, and scalable risk management. Secureframe works if you just need to check the risk box.

Continuous Monitoring

Control monitoring ensures your security controls are working as intended and function continuously and reliably. Real-time visibility reduces audit surprises and keeps you compliant between certifications.

• Secureframe monitors basic controls via integrations, but doesn’t proactively alert on drift or risk changes. Some manual oversight may still be required.
• Delve claims to offer real-time monitoring with tiered alerts and predictive risk detection.

Verdict: Delve appears to be the winner here, but since the product is new, there aren’t many user reviews to verify the claim.

Evidence Collection

Evidence collection is a platform’s ability to gather data required to demonstrate compliance directly from systems instead of relying on spreadsheets and screenshots. It’s key to passing audits without the scramble.

• Secureframe automates evidence pulls where integrations exist. However, manual uploads may be required at certain places to fill the gaps.
• Delve captures evidence automatically through integrations, browser-based actions, and custom rules.

Verdict: Delve provides broader coverage. Secureframe works well if your stack is fully supported.

Onboarding

Effective onboarding is a metric that determines the speed of implementation and the ease of setting up the platform. The more effective a platform is the faster a customer is able to see value.

• Secureframe provides guided onboarding with templates and self-serve documentation. Your team does most of the setup.
• Delve assigns onboarding engineers who help map workflows and customize setup.

Verdict: Delve for teams that want hands-on help. Secureframe if you prefer a lighter, DIY setup.

Audit support

Strong audit support means fewer surprises, smoother collaboration with auditors, and faster certifications. It directly affects how confidently you walk into an audit.

• Secureframe has an Auditor Partner Console to streamline auditor collaboration through structured tasks and dashboards.
• Delve provides full audit support, including 1:1 audit management, expert support across Slack, audit completion, and active assistance during the auditing process.

Verdict: Delve is for guided, high-touch audits. Secureframe is a better choice if you prefer managing audits independently.

Feature	Secureframe	Delve
Supported Frameworks	Supports 35+ frameworks with ready templates.	Supports standard and custom frameworks with no official count stated
Automation Depth	Automates checklists and evidence via integrations.	Uses AI to adapt controls and automate workflows.
Integrations	300+ integrations for cloud, HR, and IT systems.	100+ integrations with API-based custom checks.
Risk Management	Basic risk register for logging and tracking.	Dynamic scoring and custom risk workflows.
Continuous Monitoring	Continuous control monitoring but with less contextual alerts	Real-time alerts and predictive risk detection.
Evidence Collection	Auto-pulls evidence from supported tools; manual uploads may be needed.	Captures via integrations, browser actions, and rules.
Onboarding	Guided templates and docs; setup done by your team.	Onboarding engineers help map and set up workflows.
Audit Support	Auditor console with task tracking and dashboards.	Full audit help with expert guidance and Slack access.
Pricing	Price starts from $7500 for companies with upto 100 employees. Average deal price is $20500	Custom pricing plans available on request

What works and what doesn’t: The pros and cons of each tool

Both Secureframe and Delve have their strengths and trade-offs depending on your goals and setup. Here’s where they shine and fall-short:

Secureframe

Pros

• The platform is easy to use, even for teams without deep compliance experience.
• The support team is responsive and often delivers fast turnaround times, especially during high-pressure periods.
• The customizable Trust Center helps companies showcase their security posture to prospects and customers.
• The pricing model is predictable and affordable for early-stage companies with straightforward compliance needs.
• The platform allows teams to manage audits internally without relying on external consultants.

Cons

• The platform prioritizes simplicity, which limits flexibility in areas like vendor risk and policy customization.
• Some users report unreliable integrations, which can affect the accuracy of automated checks.
• It’s not designed for managing complex, multi-framework compliance programs over time.
• Certain users report broad alerts with less context and false positives.

Delve

Pros

• The platform extensively uses AI agents to reduce manual effort in monitoring, evidence collection, and risk management.
• It offers high customization, allowing teams to tailor controls, workflows, and policies to their environment.
• The tool offers Slack support with security experts to minimize response time.
• Delve also provides a trust report and security questionnaire autofills as an add-on service without the need for paying anything extra.
• The system scales easily across teams, frameworks, and geographies, making it ideal for complex organizations.

Cons

• The platform is still relatively new in the market and has limited customer reviews on sites like G2, which may raise concerns for risk-averse buyers.
• The flexibility and configurability can increase setup complexity, especially without strong internal ownership.
• With fewer out-of-the-box integrations, custom setups may need more engineering involvement.
• The product is still evolving rapidly, and some advanced features may require iteration to mature fully.

When to choose Secureframe and Delve?

Choose Secureframe if you need to become compliant quickly. It has minimal setup complexity and broad integration support, making it ideal for lean teams focused on closing deals quickly.

• You’re a startup or mid-stage company pursuing one or two core certifications (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001).
• You prefer a self-guided, checklist-style approach to compliance.
• Secureframe’s 300+ integrations already cover your tech stack.
• You have limited internal compliance expertise and want predictable pricing.
• You’re okay with managing audits and risk workflows internally.

Choose Delve if you’re scaling fast, have complex systems, or want compliance embedded into your team’s existing workflow.

• You operate across multiple frameworks.
• You want AI-driven automation to reduce manual effort and alert you to drift in real time.
• You need custom workflows, control mapping, and risk scoring.
• Your team values hands-on support for onboarding, audits, and vendor demands.
• You’re comfortable adopting a newer platform that’s evolving fast and offers high potential, even if it has fewer public reviews.

Sprinto: The only scalable alternative to Secureframe and Delve

While Secureframe offers speed and Delve promises flexibility, both come with trade-offs. Secureframe can feel rigid and shallow for growing teams, while Delve, though powerful, is still maturing. 

Sprinto bridges that gap by delivering deep automation, hands-on support, and true scalability without sacrificing reliability or time-to-value. It’s built for fast-growing companies that need compliance to move as fast as their business.

Why teams choose Sprinto:

• Go live faster: 80% faster onboarding with hands-on implementation support.
• Experience deeper automation: Automates 90%+ of compliance workflows across 30+ frameworks.
• Built to scale: Supports multi-framework programs with auto-mapped controls and shared evidence.
• Stay audit-ready, always: Expert-led audit prep, dedicated dashboard, and a network of top-tier auditors.
• Global support: Certified compliance specialists available across time zones including weekends.
• Maximum integrations: 300+ integrations with full engineering, HR, IT, and finance systems support.
• Battle-tested platform: Trusted by 1000+ companies in 50+ countries.

Read how Ripl achieved SOC 2 compliance readiness in 25 days while they expected the timeline to be 75 days!

Watch the platform in action and kickstart your journey.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This article was last updated in September 2025.

FAQs