Laika Vs Secureframe: Same Certifications, Different Journey 

If you’re running an SMB, compliance probably isn’t the thing you want to spend weeks obsessing over. You need the certification so deals don’t stall, and you need it fast. That’s why the Laika vs Secureframe choice matters. They both promise the same outcome, but how they get you there couldn’t be more different. And how you execute compliance is what makes or breaks your go-to-market velocity.

Comparing Laika and Secureframe isn’t a like-for-like; the differences run deeper. What you’re really choosing is how much time, risk, and manual lift your team is signing up for over the foreseeable future. 

TL;DR 

Laika Compliance vs Secureframe comes down to philosophy: Laika leans on integrated audit services while Secureframe bets on automation-first compliance with AI-driven remediation.

Secureframe vs Laika costs are a question of predictability versus flexibility. Laika builds audit costs directly into contracts, while Secureframe charges per framework and scales by headcount.

Both Laika and Secureframe earn high praise for their features. Thoropass uses white-glove onboarding and hand-holding, while Secureframe automates with coverage and speed.

What is Laika?

Laika, now operating under the name Thoropass, is one of those platforms that tried to redraw the lines of what compliance automation actually means. Where most players in the space draw a hard line between software and auditor, Laika collapses the two into a single loop; your prep happens in the same environment where the audit gets signed off. 

Founded in 2019, Laika promised itself as more than a tool: a full-stack compliance service with the software as the interface and the auditors built directly into the experience.

Laika’s ideal customer 

Thoropass isn’t for everyone. Its strongest appeal is to small and mid-sized companies who want to outsource not just the grunt work but the judgment calls too. Essentially, teams without compliance expertise in-house, or leaders who’d rather trade autonomy for certainty. 

Laika’s features 

Laika’s compliance pitch is pretty straightforward: compliance without the seams. Here are the features they offer: 

1. Integrated audit experience: Thoropass combines compliance preparation and audits in the same platform, reducing certification timelines from months to weeks.
2. Automated evidence collection: 90+ integrations across cloud, HR, and developer tools, all auditor-vetted to ensure evidence is accepted during certification.
3. AI as an assistive layer: AI is used for incremental tasks like surfacing risks, detecting drift, and highlighting posture issues.
4. Baked in guidance: In-house compliance specialists and auditors provide direct support throughout the compliance process.
5. Compliance monitoring: Real-time monitoring with alerts that align to auditor requirements. 

Supported frameworks 

Laika’s coverage includes SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, CCPA, but SOC 2 is where it really thrives. The integrated audit loop is their wedge into a market where timelines are often the single most painful constraint. 

Verdict: If Thoropass is trying to win by collapsing the distance between software and auditor, Secureframe takes the opposite bet: keep the audit on the outside, but build the strongest possible operating system for everything that happens before and after it. 

What is Secureframe?

Since its launch, Secureframe has built a reputation around speed—helping SaaS companies move from “we should probably get compliant” to “we’re ready for SOC 2” in a fraction of the time, without turning their org chart upside down. 

Secureframe’s ideal customer 

Secureframe is designed for companies that would rather keep auditors at arm’s length. Its ideal customer is the startup or SaaS team racing toward a SOC 2 badge to unlock deals, running on a modern tech stack, and unwilling to burn cycles on consultants. 

It also resonates with companies that know compliance won’t stop at one framework—organizations looking to scale fast across ISO, HIPAA, or GDPR—and who want software to handle the heavy lift while the audit remains a milestone, not part of the platform itself.

Secureframe’s features

Now every vendor promises speed and simplicity, but Secureframe’s approach lives or dies by the machinery under the hood. Here are the features:

1. Integrations: 150+ integrations with cloud, HR, developer, and security tools automate evidence collection directly from existing systems. 
2. AI-powered automation: Comply AI generates remediation guidance for failed controls, reducing back-and-forth between teams. 
3. Continuous monitoring: Real-time checks on infrastructure, policies, and controls with automated alerts for drift or violations.. 
4. Policy management: Pre-built policy templates with automated distribution, acknowledgment tracking, and org-wide adoption.

Supported frameworks 

Secureframe has deep coverage across the big six frameworks—SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and CCPA. Its real advantage lies in multi-framework scaling, where adding a new certification doesn’t mean starting from scratch but reusing mapped controls across standards. 

Laika vs Secureframe: Key differences explained

The real differences between these platforms come down to three things—how they think about pricing, how deep their automation runs, and how much human guidance they bake into the experience. 

Pricing model

• Laika: Pricing typically starts around $8,700/year, with SOC 2 audits adding another $5,800/year. Median contract values sit close to $30K annually, reflecting the fact that the audit itself is bundled into the deal.
• Secureframe: Pricing starts at $7,500 per framework, plus another $7,500 annually for the first 100 employees. Costs climb quickly as headcount grows—ranging from $15K for smaller teams to $25K–$50K for larger organizations. 

Unlike Thoropass, audits are external, so you’re paying for software and then layering audit fees separately. 

Automation and integrations

1. Laika: Laika supports approximately 90 integrations, all vetted by its in-house auditors. Evidence collection and continuous monitoring are the backbone, with AI layered in for insights. Setup sometimes requires manual intervention, but the payoff is audit-grade confidence in the data.
2. Secureframe: Secureframe covers 150+ integrations, spanning infra, HR, dev tools, and security platforms. It also layers in AI-powered remediation guidance—not just flagging failed controls, but suggesting fixes. 

Support 

1. Laika: Heavy on human touch. Dedicated compliance experts and CSMs guide you through every step. This consultative approach resonates with smaller or less experienced teams that need handholding. 
2. Secureframe: Known for responsive and knowledgeable support, with a 98% satisfaction rating. The model is less consultative than Thoropass, but scales better for teams that already know what they’re doing.

Both tools can get you to SOC 2, ISO, and beyond. The real question is:

• Do you want certainty and guidance baked in (Thoropass), even if it means living inside their closed-loop system?
• Or do you want modularity, scale, and automation-first efficiency (Secureframe), with audits staying external? 

Which is better for SOC 2 compliance? 

Both Thoropass and Secureframe can get you to a SOC 2 badge, but they approach it from different ends of the spectrum. Thoropass was practically built for SOC 2—it’s where the platform cut its teeth—and its integrated audit loop remains the sharpest edge. 

Thoropass’s pitch is speed through certainty. With auditors operating inside the platform, the usual friction of evidence requests and last-minute surprises disappears. Add to that their in-house expertise and deep SOC 2 history, and it’s no surprise they claim to shrink audits from a year to just a few weeks. 

Secureframe’s real edge is coverage. 150+ integrations automate evidence collection across your environment, while their AI-powered remediation engine tells you how to fix failed controls. 

Verdict: Laika is better suited to companies that want the SOC 2 journey wrapped end-to-end, with the audit itself stitched into the product. 

Which is better for ISO 27001 certification? 

ISO 27001 has more to do with building and maintaining an Information Security Management System (ISMS) than just a single audit. Here, Secureframe clearly has the upper hand. 

The platform provides structured ISMS support, policy templates, and workflows aligned with ISO 27001 requirements. Its integrations extend into automated testing for the 93 updated controls, and the built-in risk management module keeps assessments and treatment plans from turning into spreadsheet purgatory. 

Laika’s is still a great solution considering its guidance. Their compliance experts walk teams through risk assessments, internal audits, and certification prep, while the integrated auditor network smooths the certification handoff. But without the same depth of automation or ISMS-focused tooling, Thoropass feels more like a guided tour than an operating system.

Verdict; Both platforms promise to take the pain out of compliance, but they come at the problem from very different angles. Where Laika sells certainty through integration, Secureframe sells control through scale. And that distinction—outsourced assurance versus internal command, is exactly where the comparison starts to get interesting.

Pricing Comparison

Based on available data, here’s how the platforms compare on cost:

Aspect	Laika	Secureframe
Base annual cost	~$8,700 base + $5,800 SOC 2 audit	$15,000 (framework + 100 employees)
Median contract	$30,728	$15,000-$88,000 range
Scaling model	Custom pricing based on size/complexity	Tiered pricing by employee count
What’s included	Software + integrated audit services	Software platform + support

Reviews, scores, and more 

No matter what the feature lists say, platforms like these ultimately get judged in the trenches—by the teams running audits, chasing evidence, and wrangling policies. 

Secureframe pulls in a 4.7/5 rating on G2, with especially high marks for support and ease of use. 98% of users rate the quality of support highly, and 95% say they’d recommend the platform. Users highlight the breadth of integrations and the strength of evidence automation as key wins.

The criticisms tend to circle familiar pain points: integrations don’t always go deep enough for niche tools, the pricing structure can feel opaque, and customization for edge cases is somewhat limited.

Thoropass edges slightly higher with a 4.8/5 rating, but the shape of the praise is different. Where Secureframe gets credit for automation breadth, Thoropass earns kudos for white-glove onboarding, expert guidance, and the integrated audit experience. Customers consistently note how the platform reduces SOC 2 pain by collapsing the audit into the workflow itself. 

On the downside, users point to an interface that could use more polish and workflows that feel rigid at times. Information and tasks can also feel scattered across different areas of the platform. But for companies that value close guidance over flexibility, these are often acceptable trade-offs.

Who should you choose? 

Each tool has use cases where they shine. Here’s what you should look out for:

1. Choose Laika if: You’re at the start of your compliance journey, short on internal expertise, and want heavy human guidance baked into the process. Their integrated audit model is designed for certainty: less back-and-forth, more hand-holding, and a faster path to SOC 2 when you don’t want to juggle multiple vendors. 
2. Choose Secureframe if: You already have strong internal security maturity, a modern stack, and a team that can make use of automation at scale. Secureframe is built for speed and extensibility—achieve compliance quickly, scale into new frameworks with control mapping, and keep auditors separate from your day-to-day. 

Sprinto: The best alternative for speed and guidance 

If Secureframe is about automation at scale and Laika is about certainty through hand-holding, Sprinto sits firmly in the middle. It combines the speed and integration coverage of Secureframe with the reliability and support Laika customers value—without the high costs or lock-in.

Sprinto is built for cloud-native companies that need certifications fast, but don’t want to compromise on auditor confidence. With 200+ integrations, a common control framework for scaling into SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, or CCPA, and real-time compliance monitoring, Sprinto offers automation depth while still backing it with expert guidance when you need it.

Key Features

• 200+ integrations: Automates evidence collection across your existing stack.
• Common control framework: Expand from SOC 2 into ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, or CCPA without starting over.
• Real-time monitoring: Stay compliant between audits with continuous checks.
• Scalability + support: Automation-first, with expert guidance available when needed.

Book a call to see how Sprinto fits in your tech stack!

Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This article was last updated in September 2025.

FAQs