Vanta vs. Strike Graph: The Only Comparison That Matters

Vanta is a well-known name in the compliance space. Strike Graph is more of a contender in that sense. 

While both Vanta and Strike Graph promise to make compliance easier, faster, and less manual, the way they get there couldn’t be more different.

Vanta sells speed and simplicity. Strike Graph sells flexibility and control. One gives you pre-baked checklists. The other gives you a blank canvas. And that means the real question isn’t “which one is better?” It’s which one suits your business model better.

In this breakdown, we’ll dissect how each platform stacks up on automation, control, audit readiness, AI, pricing, and who they’re actually built for, and how you can pick between the two tools. 

Vanta: A quick overview

Vanta is a security compliance automation platform that helps companies prepare for and maintain certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. Its core function is to automate evidence collection, monitor security controls continuously, and streamline audit readiness through integrations with services like AWS, GCP, GitHub, and others.

Strike Graph: A quick overview

Strike Graph is a compliance management solution that helps companies simplify and accelerate their path to compliance through flexible and risk-based programs. It offers AI-powered control testing, customizable frameworks, and streamlined audit workflows, giving teams more control over how they meet security standards. 

Quick Comparison of Vanta and Strike Graph

Here’s a quick snapshot of what are the real capabilities of each of the platforms, besides the promises:

Feature / Capability	Vanta	Strike Graph
Primary Focus	Continuous compliance automation	Customizable, risk-based compliance programs
Automation	Medium (automated evidence collection, continuous control monitoring and mostly pre-built checks)	High (AI-powered control testing with customizable test design)
Framework coverage	35+ frameworks	30+ frameworks
Customization	Limited – pre-packaged workflows and templates	High – customizable frameworks, controls, and workflows
Implementation effort	Fast setup via integrations; rigid structure post-setup	Requires more initial setup and decision-making to tailor the program
Audit support	Partner network, evidence dashboard, integrations	Built-in audit workflows, real-time evidence management
Integrations	300+ integrations	100+ integrations
Pricing model	Subscription-based (custom pricing)	Subscription-based (custom pricing, often lower entry point than Vanta)
Customer support	Dedicated manager + knowledge base	Dedicated guidance; audit and security expertise on demand
Best for	Startups and scaleups needing fast, standardized compliance	Teams with complex or evolving compliance needs and risk considerations

What’s under the hood? Detailed Feature Comparison

Not all automation tools are created equal. Let’s have a look the feature capabilities of both the tools and get into the real differences: 

1. Risk management

Vanta enables automated risk identification, scoring and remediation guidance but mostly operates on a checklist-driven model offering limited visibility. This works fine for startups but creates issues for businesses with real risk complexity.

Strike Graph operates on a risk-first model. It lets you define your risk universe, link it to controls, and build a compliance program around it. This is ideal for orgs where risk is not uniform or static but yes it requires more setup time. 

Verdict: Vanta is faster out of the gate. Strike Graph gives you more control but makes you work for it.

2. Control monitoring

Vanta automates monitoring via integrations, but only for pre-defined controls. It’s great for common infra like AWS, GCP, Okta, etc., but lacks customization. Custom systems aren’t supported unless you have workarounds.

Strike Graph uses AI to power flexible control tests, allowing you to build, modify, and run automated checks based on your requirements. It also supports tiered alerting for drift detection. 

Verdict: Vanta brings ease and speed. Strike Graph brings flexibility and effort.

3. Evidence collection

Vanta automates evidence collection via integrations but may require manual uploads for systems not covered by its integration suite.

Strike Graph combines automated evidence collection with manual workflows, ensuring comprehensive coverage. It also plans to introduce AI-powered browser capture to gather evidence from non-integrated tools. 

Verdict: Despite automation, both platforms still require manual effort, especially when dealing with edge cases or unsupported systems

4. Audit support

Vanta offers structured audit workflows, with auditor dashboards and a vetted network. It’s smooth if you play by their rules ie. within their predefined processes and control templates.

Strike Graph gives you more flexibility; You can bring your own auditor, adjust workflows, and customize how you prepare. But it’s less plug-and-play. 

Verdict: Both improve audit readiness, but still demand hands-on prep. Vanta is smoother if you conform; Strike Graph gives control but requires more internal ownership.

5. Third-party risk management

Vanta offers basic vendor tracking where you can log vendors and attach documents like SOC 2 reports or questionnaires. There ‘s some basic automation and minimal risk scoring as well.

Strike Graph lets you assign risk levels, manage evidence, and incorporate vendor risks into your broader compliance program. But it’s not a full-blown TPRM platform either. 

Verdict: Both offer vendor tracking (and not vendor governance). Expect to supplement this function with spreadsheets if third-party risk is a real concern.

6. Integrations

Vanta has 300+ integrations. Setup is fast, under 2 weeks in most cases—if you fit their mold.

Strike Graph has fewer integrations (~100), but offers more control with APIs and data customization. Setup takes longer.

Verdict: Vanta is a clear winner here in terms of the number of integrations and set-up time.

7. Policy and training

Vanta provides ready-made policies and basic training modules enough to tick boxes. However these policy templates are  not deeply customizable.

Strike Graph allows you to create, manage, and version policies in-platform, linking them tightly to risks and training workflows.

Verdict: Vanta is fast for first-time compliance. Strike Graph suits teams that need policies to evolve with their risk and ops but that requires some bandwidth. Neither platform makes policy truly strategic by default. 

Vanta Vs Strike Graph: Supported Frameworks

Both Vanta and Strike Graph cover the core compliance stack. Vanta is faster if you’re picking from a predefined list. Strike Graph is better if you need to customize or scale across non-standard or overlapping requirements.

Vanta supports 30+ frameworks, covering all major compliance standards across security, privacy, and industry-specific needs. This includes:

• SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and NIST CSF
• Industry-specific: HITRUST, CCPA, NYDFS, GLBA
• Privacy-focused: ISO 27701, GDPR, UK GDPR

Strike Graph supports 25+ frameworks, with a focus on flexibility and customizability. Common supported frameworks include:

• SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and PCI DSS
• Ability to create custom frameworks or adapt hybrid requirements
• Control mapping across multiple frameworks using a central risk model

Pricing comparison

Cost is an important factor when choosing a tool. Here’s a pricing comparison between the two platforms to help you make a well-informed decision:

Vanta

• Vanta offers custom pricing plans based on the number of employees and business requirements.
• For small businesses, the starting price is approximately $10,000/year for the Essential Plan.
• For pro and enterprise plans, customers can pay anywhere from $30,000 to $80,000.
• According to Vendr Marketplace, the median buyer pays $19,750 per year.
• Add-ons such as advanced questionnaire automation, multiple workspaces, and Trust Center branding may incur potential extra fees.

Strike Graph

• Strike graph offers customizable pricing tailored to specific business needs, with flexibility to add services as required.
• After a free trial, the ‘Certify’ plan starts at $9,000/ year and the scale plan starts at $18,000/year.
  There is a custom quote for the ‘Enterprise’ plan.

Vanta is expensive in the long-term. Strike Graph can be as well based on your customization requirements.

What makes Vanta unique?

Vanta is the go-to for startups and scaleups that want to check the compliance box fast. If you want speed, simplicity, and minimal decision-making.

• Speed to value: Vanta is optimized for fast onboarding and quick wins. Companies can be audit-ready in weeks, not months.
• Breadth of integrations: With 300+ integrations, it connects easily to popular tools across cloud, code, HR, and ticketing systems.
• Audit ecosystem: Vanta’s vetted auditor network and standardized evidence packaging reduce friction during certification.
• Checklist simplicity: Ideal for orgs that want a plug-and-play compliance experience without deep customization.

What makes Strike Graph unique?

Strike Graph is built for companies where risks are unique, clients are demanding, and frameworks are layered.

• Risk-first architecture: Built to let you define and control your own compliance landscape, not just follow one.
• AI-driven control validation: Features like Verify AI help validate controls dynamically, going beyond static checklists.
• Policy-as-code flexibility: Customize controls, frameworks, and evidence workflows in a modular, adaptable way.
• Custom framework support: Tailor frameworks to client demands or hybrid needs without bending your ops.

Vanta vs Strike Graph: Which is suitable for your business?

If you want done-for-you compliance with predictable playbooks, Vanta is a safer bet for you. It’s ideal for startups and growth-stage teams chasing the basic SOC 2 or ISO with lean ops and little appetite for customization. You’ll trade flexibility for speed, but you’ll move fast and stay audit-ready with less overhead

If you’re navigating multiple frameworks, unique risks, or client-driven compliance demands, Strike Graph gives you the tools and flexibility to design your own path. It’s better suited for mature teams with a dedicated compliance function who see security as strategic, but you’ll trade speed and simplicity for control and customization.

Skip the trade-off altogether with Sprinto

Vanta gets you moving fast but limits you later. Strike Graph gives you flexibility but slows you down upfront.

Sprinto is built to skip that trade-off altogether.

With 35+ framework support out-of-the-box, custom framework support 300+ native integrations, and a context-aware automation engine, Sprinto delivers speed and adaptability without compromise. Onboarding is fast, often under two weeks. Control mapping is automated and aligned to your actual systems, not just framework templates. And continuous monitoring works out of the box, for both automated and manual checks.

Unlike Vanta, Sprinto doesn’t box you into rigid workflows. Unlike Strike Graph, you don’t need a compliance engineer to operate it. Sprinto combines the best of both: rapid execution with audit-grade accuracy, flexibility with ease of use.

• Launch new frameworks in days, not months
• Track compliance across teams, systems, and audits in real-time
• Trigger alerts, evidence collection, and remediation automatically
• Scale across frameworks without duplicating effort

No rigid templates. No bloated workflows. Just continuous, contextual compliance designed to scale. Speak to an expert today.

Disclaimer
The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This blog was last updated in October, 2025.

FAQs