Oneleet vs Delve: A Complete Feature-by-Feature Comparison

If you’re researching Oneleet vs Delve, you’re probably close to making a decision on which platform will run your compliance program. Both promise to make compliance easier and audits smoother, but they take very different approaches. Those differences can shape how fast you get certified, how much work your team takes on, and how well your compliance program scales in the future.

In this guide, we compare Oneleet and Delve on key features, automation, integrations, and support so you can see their strengths, trade-offs, and which fits your compliance needs best.

TL; DR

Oneleet is best for startups and lean teams that want a bundled compliance-and-security solution with pentests, scans, and hands-on audit management, but it has fewer integrations and lighter automation.

Delve suits growing or complex organizations that need AI-driven automation, customizable workflows, and scalability across multiple frameworks, though it is newer and has fewer native integrations.

Your choice depends on whether you prioritize bundled services and simplicity (Oneleet) or adaptive automation and scalability (Delve)

Overview of tools

Oneleet is built for early-stage startups and lean teams who are tackling compliance for the first time. It offers a lightweight, bundled solution focused primarily on standard frameworks such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Oneleet adopts an all-in-one cybersecurity approach and also offers security services such as penetration testing. It’s ideal for companies looking to check the compliance box with minimal overhead and predictable pricing.

Delve is built for scaling companies and enterprise teams that manage complex, evolving compliance environments. It uses AI agents to automate evidence collection, monitor real-time risks, and adapt controls as your environment changes. Delve goes heavy on automation and is well-suited for companies managing multiple compliance requirements with commonalities, without slowing down operations.

Oneleet vs Delve: A detailed comparison of features

Now that we’ve covered the basics, let’s see how Oneleet and Delve compare on their core features and capabilities:

Supported frameworks

Framework support determines how easily your compliance solution scales across industries and use cases.

• Oneleet supports a broad and growing list of frameworks, including SOC 2 (Type 1 & 2), ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI‑DSS, GDPR, CIS IG1, NIST 800‑171, and EU DORA. It also offers support for custom frameworks, enabling cross-framework mapping to simplify multiple audit engagements.
• Delve supports standard frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and custom compliance frameworks. The company does not provide an exact official count of supported frameworks.

Verdict: Oneleet has a clear list of supported frameworks, making it a strong choice if you’re targeting standards like PCI-DSS or NIST 800-171. Delve is more flexible but less transparent about exactly what it covers.

Depth of automation 

The level of automation drives how much manual work is removed from compliance processes and how quickly you can respond to changes.

• Oneleet automates basic functions such as evidence collection or real-time system scans. It simplifies standard compliance tasks but operates on a more rule-based model rather than dynamically adapting to your environment.
• Delve on the other hand, heavily focuses on AI for adaptive automation. It goes beyond static rules to flag risks in real-time and trigger workflows based on context.

Verdict: Delve offers deeper, AI-driven automation built for dynamic environments. Oneleet is effective for routine tasks but lacks the intelligence layer to adjust as things change.

Integrations

Strong integration coverage ensures data flows automatically, reducing manual evidence gathering and gaps during audits.

• Oneleet offers 20+ basic integrations covering core cloud and SaaS tools such as GitHub and Azure. It does not support custom integration via APIs currently.
• Delve offers 100+ integrations and supports API-based custom checks for unique environments.

Verdict: Delve wins on flexibility. Oneleet covers the basics but hits limits in complex or custom stacks.

Risk management

Effective risk management helps teams identify, score, and address security risks before they become audit blockers or incidents.

• Oneleet includes security measures, such as code scanning, attack surface discovery, and bundled pentests, to help uncover vulnerabilities early. However, it does not offer a structured risk register or even dynamic risk scoring.
• Delve operates on continuous risk intelligence. It supports automated mapping between risks and controls, dynamic scoring, and tailored workflows for risk remediation.

Verdict: Oneleet is good for tactical visibility and to spot weak points early. Delve supports risk management at a deeper level and ensures systematic risk handling over time.

Continuous monitoring

The continuous monitoring functionality keeps controls in check all year round, helping you spot compliance drift before it impacts your compliance status.

• Oneleet provides real-time scans through its existing integrations, but there’s no clear mention of features like drift detection, advanced alerts, or monitoring beyond its supported tools.
• Delve monitors systems in real time with tiered alerts and predictive capabilities to detect issues before they become failures.

Verdict: Oneleet can be effective for continuous monitoring if it supports your current tech stack. However, if your goal is always-on monitoring with contextual alerts that adapt to your environment, Delve has a clearer edge.

Evidence collection

Automated evidence collection reduces audit prep stress by pulling proof directly from your systems instead of relying on manual uploads.

• On that front, Oneleet automates evidence collection where integrations exist but still relies on manual uploads for unsupported systems.
• Delvecaptures evidence continuously via system integrations, browser-based activity, and customizable rules.

Verdict: Delve minimizes audit prep effort. Oneleet works well for supported stacks but leaves some manual gaps.

Onboarding

A smooth onboarding process helps your team get value from the platform faster and reduces the risk of setup mistakes.

• Oneleet organizes a scoping call and helps build a customized security program. After that, it provides self-serve resources such as playbooks, templates, and documentation. The support is available if you have any queries.
• Delve has dedicated onboarding engineers to map workflows and set up the system with you. This hands-on approach helps ensure the platform is configured correctly from the start and tailored to your environment.

Verdict: Oneleet offers a structured start with self-serve follow-through, which works well for teams that prefer to move at their own pace. Delve is a better fit if you’re looking for hands-on support throughout the setup process.

Audit support

Good audit support can be the difference between an easy certification and a long, stressful one.

• Oneleet offers strong support to manage the audit process. They work with third-party auditors to facilitate smoother audits and minimize back and forth. Communication is usually handled through Slack for quick turnaround times.
• Delve also offers high-touch audit support with dedicated experts, real-time Slack assistance, and hands-on help during the audit.

Verdict: Oneleet acts as an intermediary with auditors and provides responsive, on-demand guidance throughout. Delve offers more structured, high-touch support with dedicated experts embedded in the process from start to finish. The right fit depends on how much hands-on help your team needs.

Feature	Delve	Oneleet
Supported Frameworks	SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and custom frameworks	Supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, NIST 800‑171, EU DORA, and more.
Automation Depth	AI-driven automation that adapts to system changes in real time.	Basic automation for evidence collection and scanning
Integrations	100+ integrations with support for custom API-based checks.	~30 integrations with core tools; limited extensibility.
Risk Management	Dynamic risk scoring, control mapping, and risk workflows.	Offers code scanning, pentests, and access reviews; no structured risk engine.
Continuous Monitoring	Real-time, tiered alerts and predictive risk detection.	Real-time scans via integrations; lacks advanced drift or alerting features.
Evidence Collection	Captures evidence via integrations, browser activity, and custom rules.	Evidence is auto-collected from supported systems; manual input may be needed.
Onboarding	Dedicated onboarding engineers guide setup and workflow mapping.	Scoping call followed by self-serve setup using templates and docs.
Audit Support	Full audit support with dedicated experts and Slack access.	Acts as intermediary with auditors; responsive support via Slack.

What works and what doesn’t: The pros and cons of each tool

Every tool has pros and cons. In this section, we take a look at the key advantages and limitations each tool brings.

Oneleet

Pros

• Bundled services such as pen tests and vulnerability scans minimize the need to manage multiple vendors.
• Support is quick and reliable, especially over Slack, which is helpful during stressful audit times.
• The platform’s focus on security and compliance helps companies improve posture and close deals faster.
• It handles communication with auditors directly and pushes back on unnecessary requests, which takes pressure off internal teams.

Cons

• Oneleet has a smaller list of integrations, which can limit automation and create extra manual work.
• The platform is priced higher than some alternatives, which might not work for early-stage teams on a tight budget.
• Teams with complex or custom tech stacks may need extra support or workarounds to get full value from the platform.

Delve

Pros

• The extensive use of AI agents makes the tool faster, smarter, and more adaptive while massively reducing manual work.
• Teams can customize controls, workflows, and policies to match their exact environment, which makes it flexible for different setups.
• Delve includes extras like trust reports and auto-filled security questionnaires at no additional cost, saving time during vendor reviews.
• The platform is built to scale across teams, frameworks, and regions — ideal for companies with complex or growing compliance needs.

Cons:

• Some users feel the experience can lack depth, citing generic policy templates, surface-level pentests, and limited detail when addressing technical security questions.
• Its flexibility can lead to a steeper learning curve or longer setup time if your team doesn’t have strong internal ownership.
• There are fewer plug-and-play integrations, so custom setups may need engineering support to configure properly.

When to choose Oneleet and Delve

Every tool comes with a strong use case and the choice depends on your needs, size of the organization and security maturity.

Choose Oneleet if:

• You want a single platform that bundles compliance tools with security services like pentests and code scans.
• Your priority is to get compliant quickly with strong hands-on guidance and less internal effort.
• You value having a team that manages the audit process for you, including direct communication with auditors.
• Your compliance needs to focus on a few core frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA.
• You’re fine with limited integrations and are comfortable filling gaps with manual work or vendor support.

Choose Delve if:

• You want AI-driven automation to reduce manual work in evidence collection, monitoring, and risk management.
• You need flexibility to customize controls, workflows, and policies to fit your exact environment.
• You operate across multiple frameworks, teams, or geographies and need a solution that can scale with you.
• You want fast access to security experts via Slack for ongoing questions and complex issues.
• You’re comfortable using a newer platform with fewer reviews, but with the potential for rapid feature growth.

Sprinto: The only scalable alternative to Oneleet and Delve

Oneleet’s limited integrations can restrict automation, and Delve, while powerful, is still maturing and may require more time and internal involvement to fully unlock its capabilities.

Sprinto bridges that gap. It delivers deep automation, expert-led onboarding, and the ability to manage multiple frameworks at once without slowing your business down. It is built for companies that need compliance to run as fast as they do.

Why teams choose Sprinto:

• Faster go-live: 80% faster onboarding with guided setup from compliance experts.
• Deeper automation: Automates 90%+ of compliance workflows across 30+ frameworks.
• Multi-framework support: Shared controls and evidence mean you can add frameworks with minimal extra work.
• Audit-grade reliability: Expert-led audit prep, a dedicated dashboard, and access to a network of top-tier auditors.
• Maximized integration: 300+ integrations with engineering, HR, IT, and finance systems.
• Global support: Certified specialists available across time zones, including weekends.

Sprinto combines the breadth of integrations, the depth of automation, and the consistency of hands-on expertise, giving you a single platform to grow your compliance program without hitting roadblocks later.

Watch the platform in action and kickstart your journey.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This article was last updated in September 2025.

FAQs