Compliance used to mean spreadsheets, chaos, and late nights. Now, there are a number of automation solutions like Scrut and Delve that simplify the grind; plugging into your stack, collecting evidence, and expediting audit-readiness.
Both promise speed. Both cut the busywork. But they take different paths.
This Scrut vs Delve comparison breaks down the essentials, framework coverage, onboarding, automation depth, auditor experience, and support so you can see how well each fits the needs of growing companies.
| TL;DR Scrut is a broad GRC platform that supports 50+ frameworks, offers deep integrations, and enables structured, continuous compliance. Delve is a similar kind of tool, but it leans heavily on AI agents, automates evidence collection, and bundles audits internally. If you want breadth of frameworks and scalability, Scrut is your choice. If you prefer AI-driven speed and minimal manual work, Delve is for you. |
Overview of Scrut and Delve
What is Scrut?
Scrut is a modern, AI-powered Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) platform built for continuous, automated compliance. It supports 50+ pre-built frameworks—including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS—and also allows organizations to create custom frameworks for industry-specific standards, regional regulations, or internal security policies.
Scrut centralizes all compliance workflows with features like automated evidence collection (via deep integrations across cloud and enterprise tools), real-time risk monitoring, task and workflow management, policy and content libraries, auditor collaboration, and a Trust Vault for securely sharing audit-ready documentation. The result: less manual work, more visibility, and a smoother path to staying compliant year-round.
What is Delve?
Delve is an AI-powered, agentic compliance platform designed to compress months of compliance work into days. Supporting SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, and emerging standards like ISO 42001, Delve uses AI agents to automate evidence collection, screenshots, questionnaire responses, cloud and code scans, remediation tracking, and even policy Q&A. Teams can onboard in under 30 minutes and complete platform setup in just 10–15 hours, enabling faster audit readiness.
Scrut vs Delve: Key features compared
Now that we’ve covered the basics of Scrut and Delve, let’s break down how these two compliance automation platforms compare across the most important dimensions:
1. Depth of compliance frameworks
Scrut supports over 50 pre-built frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, and more. It also lets you create custom frameworks for industry-specific standards, regional regulations, or internal security benchmarks.
Delve, in contrast, supports the six most in-demand frameworks — SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, and ISO 42001. While it covers the essentials, it does not have the same depth of pre-built options as Scrut, and there’s no mention of an advanced cross-framework control mapping engine.
Verdict: If you need a large framework library or plan to expand into niche standards over time, Scrut’s broader coverage and custom framework capability make it the more scalable choice. Delve is a strong fit for teams focused on the most common certifications.
2. Automation capabilities
Scrut’s automation is powered by Scrut Teammates, an AI co-pilot for GRC that works alongside your team. It uses a proprietary knowledge graph to connect your risks, controls, assets, and policies in one place. Scrut Teammates can log and assign tasks, monitor controls in real time, and even suggest tailored remediation steps down to Infrastructure-as-Code fixes when issues are detected. It also automates repetitive work like answering security questionnaires by pulling approved responses from a central library, cutting hours of manual effort.
Delve takes a fully agentic approach. Its AI agents behave like additional team members, capable of running compliance tasks end-to-end without constant supervision. This includes collecting screenshots, filling questionnaires, scanning cloud infrastructure and code for security issues, tracking remediations, and even assisting with policy Q&A. These agents are context-aware, meaning they adapt their execution to your specific environment, and Delve claims they reduce manual busywork by up to 75%.
Verdict: Scrut’s AI is strong for continuous compliance, remediation guidance, and questionnaire automation, but Delve’s agentic model covers a wider range of hands-on compliance tasks from start to finish, making it better for small or lean teams that want maximum automation coverage.
Not sold on Scrut? These Scrut competitors offer strong alternatives.
3. Integrations
Scrut integrates with an expansive range of tools from cloud providers and identity platforms to HR systems, ticketing, project management, and security monitoring, so you can keep compliance running smoothly in the tools you already use. If your essential tool isn’t natively supported, Scrut lets you request a custom integration so nothing falls through the cracks.
Delve integrates with core infrastructure and productivity tools, such as AWS, GitHub, Slack, and more, enabling its AI agents to pull evidence across systems, monitor your environment continuously, and proactively flag compliance gaps in real time.
Verdict: Scrut for breadth; Delve for AI-native agility. Scrut offers an enterprise-grade integration portfolio—covering cloud, HR, productivity, identity, and more. Delve, while leaner, optimizes for AI-powered speed and works well across key cloud, code, and communication tools for fast-moving teams.
4. Evidence collection
Scrut uses Scrut Monitor to automate evidence collection end-to-end. It connects to tools like AWS, Azure, GitHub, and HR systems to pull logs, commit history, resource inventories, and employee training records on your schedule.
Scrut continuously harvests the data you need, whether daily, weekly, or monthly, and flags failures when integrations go offline or data doesn’t arrive as expected. Evidence gaps can be tied to ticket workflows, triggering tasks in tools your team already uses, ensuring issues are addressed immediately.
Delve’s AI agents take a hands-on role in evidence collection: they screenshot configuration screens, complete questionnaires, scan cloud infrastructure and code repositories, and track real-time changes, all aligned to required compliance frameworks. These agents map to your tech stack and workflows, populating audit evidence without manual effort and continuously refreshing the data to alert you when gaps arise.
Verdict: Scrut excels at structured, continuous evidence readiness with tight workflow integration. But Delve goes further, removing most human touchpoints altogether making it the stronger choice for teams chasing near-zero manual work.
5. Policy management
Scrut provides an auditor-approved, ready-to-use policy library mapped to frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA. Teams can customize policies, configure workflows, and assign clear ownership, with framework-specific views for easy navigation. Policy enforcement is automated through integrations with HR and identity systems, ensuring consistent application and governance across the organization.
Delve takes a faster, AI-first approach. It uses AI-assisted drafting and automation to generate and deploy policies during HIPAA or SOC 2 campaigns, often as part of its one-click compliant infrastructure setup. Real-time monitoring keeps policy enforcement in sync with infrastructure changes, reducing the need for manual updates.
Verdict: Scrut delivers structured governance and scalability, but Delve’s AI-driven drafting, deployment, and real-time enforcement give it an edge for teams prioritizing speed and minimal manual work.
Looking beyond Delve? Here’s a list of Delve alternatives for a better roundup.
6. Navigation and dashboard experience
Scrut delivers a polished, structured interface built for clarity and control. Its organized dashboards, intuitive sidebar, flexible views, and interactive charts enable smooth navigation and visibility over complex compliance workflows. Users on SoftwareAdvice highlight how easily it maps controls, tracks evidence, and automates tasks—making audit prep feel manageable and streamlined.
Delve, by contrast, takes a conversational, AI-powered UX approach, designing compliance to feel like a natural, enjoyable experience. Reviews across SourceForge describe its interface as clean, intuitive, and free of unnecessary clutter. Users praise the AI chat and guided workflows for turning compliance from a chore into something “pleasantly simple” and engaging.
Verdict: While Scrut’s interface shines for structured GRC programs, Delve’s AI-first design delivers faster navigation, less friction, and a more enjoyable day-to-day experience—making it the clear leader for usability.
7. Pricing
Scrut offers custom, all-inclusive pricing with no extra fees for users or frameworks. Optional add-ons like audits or pen tests are available.
Delve also uses quote-based pricing, focusing on speed and automation to cut manual work, but doesn’t disclose cost details.
Verdict: Scrut’s transparent, all-in-one pricing makes it a better value bet.
| Feature | Scrut | Delve |
| Supported Frameworks | 50+ frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, custom frameworks) with cross-framework control mapping. | 6 core frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, ISO 42001), no control reuse. |
| Automation Capabilities | AI-powered workflows, automated evidence collection, risk monitoring, and task management across all compliance stages. | AI-driven chat-based workflows, quick setup, and rapid automation for core compliance tasks. |
| Integrations | 70+ deep integrations with cloud, security, and enterprise tools; real-time sync for evidence and risk data. | 100+ integrations across cloud, HR, and security systems. |
| Evidence Collection | Continuous, automated evidence capture with mapping to controls; auditor-friendly formats. | Automated evidence collection linked to controls, embedded in workflows. |
| Policy Management | Centralized library, AI-assisted drafting, version control, and automated assignments for reviews. | AI-assisted policy creation and templates; simple approval workflows. |
| UI/UX | Structured, polished dashboards; interactive charts; easy navigation for complex workflows. | Conversational, AI-first interface; guided flows; clean, minimal design. |
| Pricing | Custom all-inclusive pricing with optional add-ons; no extra user or framework fees. | Quote-based pricing; focuses on speed and automation, but lacks public details. |
Breaking down the pros and cons
Every platform has its strengths—and its trade-offs. Here’s a clear-eyed breakdown of where each tool shines, and where you might hit friction.
Scrut
Pros
- Supports 50+ frameworks with cross-framework control mapping
- Deep integrations with cloud, security, and enterprise tools
- AI-assisted policy creation, evidence collection, and risk monitoring
- Structured dashboards for full visibility
Cons
- No public pricing; must request a quote
- Broader feature set may feel complex for smaller teams
- Implementation may take longer than ultra-fast competitors like Delve
Delve
Pros
- Extremely fast time-to-audit, sometimes within days
- Delve’s standout advantage is its conversational, AI-powered UX.
- 100+ integrations across common cloud and HR systems
- Includes pre-vetted auditor as part of subscription
- Lightweight, easy onboarding for small teams
Cons
- Supports only six core frameworks, no control reuse across them
- Fewer advanced GRC features compared to larger platforms
- Limited public details on auditor workflows and pricing
Best Fit: Use cases and team sizes
Not all compliance platforms fit all growth stages. Here’s how each one aligns with company size, security maturity, and scaling goals.
Scrut
- Ideal for mid to large companies needing multi-framework compliance.
- Centralizes GRC under one platform with deep automation and structured oversight.
- Well-suited for security-conscious SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and enterprises planning to scale.
- Chosen for its breadth of framework coverage and enterprise-grade capabilities.
Delve
- Perfect for startups and lean teams prioritizing speed to audit.
- Best for short framework lists like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR.
- Excels when a deal is blocked by a compliance requirement.
- Offers a minimal, AI-first interface over complex dashboards.
Why Sprinto outpaces Scrut and Delve
Where Scrut focuses on structured GRC depth and Delve on AI-driven speed, Sprinto combines both in a single compliance engine, fast to deploy, built to scale, and cost-efficient to run.
End-to-end automation: Automate up to 99% of control checks with 300+ integrations validated, tiered, and alert-driven so you fix issues before they break compliance.
Smart entity-based mapping: Centralize all systems, users, and assets into a compliance graph that auto-maps controls across 30+ frameworks without redundant work.
Fully managed audits: Hands-on compliance experts coordinate with auditors, run pre-audit reviews, and cut prep time so you pass without last-minute fire drills.
Strategic onboarding and support: Project-managed onboarding, custom program design, and 24×7 access to certified lead auditors ensure smooth, confident scaling.
Sprinto delivers the speed of Delve, the depth of Scrut, and the efficiency neither can match. Speak to our experts today.
| Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This article was last updated in September 2025. |
FAQs
Sprinto automates compliance with reusable controls, broad integrations, and an auditor workspace. It’s designed to scale across many standards without duplicating effort. Delve optimizes for very fast setup, conversational guidance, and bundled audits. If your goal is sustained scale across multiple frameworks, Sprinto is a fit. If you need to pass one standard fast, Delve delivers speed.
Vanta is a mature compliance platform with broad framework coverage and one of the largest integration catalogs. It’s great for continuous monitoring but may involve more manual policy creation than Delve or Sprinto.
Drata is strong for developer-heavy teams—it integrates tightly with engineering pipelines and security tooling. It delivers continuous monitoring and automation but assumes a higher baseline of internal security maturity.
Sprinto uses a Common Control Framework to map once and reuse controls across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and more. Scrut offers similar multi-framework mapping with policy enforcement built in. Delve reuses evidence intelligently but is most optimized for single-framework speed. Vanta and Drata support many standards but may require more manual linking.
Radhika Sarraf
Radhika Sarraf is a content marketer at Sprinto, where she explores the world of cybersecurity and compliance through storytelling and strategy. With a background in B2B SaaS, she thrives on turning intricate concepts into content that educates, engages, and inspires. When she’s not decoding the nuances of GRC, you’ll likely find her experimenting in the kitchen, planning her next travel adventure, or discovering hidden gems in a new city.
Explore more
research & insights curated to help you earn a seat at the table.

















