Drata vs Delve: Which Compliance Automation Platform Wins in 2025?

Every SaaS company eventually hits the same crossroads: how do you prove trust quickly without overwhelming your team or blowing up your budget? The wrong compliance automation platform can slow you down with hidden costs, manual rework, and audit delays, while the right one turns compliance into a growth enabler. For most teams at this stage, the Drata vs Delve comparison is already on the table, and choosing between them could determine whether you scale with confidence or stall under pressure.

This guide gives you a clear, side-by-side breakdown of Drata and Delve across frameworks, integrations, automation depth, pricing, and support, plus a third option that outpaces them both. By the end, you’ll know exactly which platform fits your goals, your team, and your timelines.

Overview: Drata and Delve at a Glance

Drata

Drata is a compliance automation platform designed for fast-scaling SaaS companies and tech organizations with growing regulatory needs. It connects a company’s systems, applications, and infrastructure to security and privacy frameworks, automating control monitoring, evidence collection, and audit readiness. Drata supports multiple frameworks and is built to help organizations maintain a continuously monitored, audit-ready compliance posture.

With 200+ integrations, solid automation depth, and support for major frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, Drata appeals to VC-backed teams who want both the substance and the optics of a recognizable compliance brand when selling to enterprise buyers.

Where Drata stands out from competitors is its balance of breadth and brand equity. While it’s not the cheapest option, the investment signals maturity and credibility to customers, partners, and investors, making it particularly attractive to companies already operating in or aiming for enterprise markets.

Delve

Delve takes an AI-first approach, targeting companies looking for a fast, intelligent way to achieve compliance milestones, typically SOC 2 or ISO 27001. Its AI-driven product and pricing are designed for founder-led compliance projects and growing companies that need speed and automation, leveraging AI agents that can collect evidence beyond traditional API limitations. Delve’s platform supports 100+ integrations and emphasizes reducing manual work through intelligent automation rather than traditional integration-heavy approaches.

Unlike Drata’s broad-market, credibility-first approach, Delve presents itself as the cutting-edge, AI-native choice for teams that want to move fast and leverage modern automation. While it started with a startup focus, Delve now serves companies securing significant enterprise contracts, including deals with Fortune 500 companies. This focus makes it appealing as both a “starter” tool and a scalable solution for companies planning rapid growth across multiple frameworks.

Feature Comparison: Drata vs Delve

When choosing a compliance automation tool, marketing claims aren’t enough. You need a side-by-side view of real performance. This Drata vs Delve comparison covers frameworks, integrations, automation, onboarding, support, and pricing, showing where each excels, where they lag, and which fits your compliance goals best.

Compliance and framework coverage

Drata supports a solid mix of frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and CCPA, making it a strong Delve alternative for teams that need a broader range of infosec frameworks. While it reuses some controls when you add a new framework, the expansion still requires manual mapping and extra configuration work, which can slow multi-framework rollouts.

Delve focuses on a narrower set of frameworks, primarily SOC 2 and ISO 27001 — with partial support for HIPAA and GDPR. Adding more frameworks is possible but involves heavy manual rework, making it less suited for teams planning to expand compliance scope quickly.

Verdict: Drata is more versatile for multi-framework needs, though neither platform offers seamless, automated expansion without some manual effort. For smaller teams with a limited compliance scope, Delve can be a practical Drata alternative that delivers speed and simplicity without overengineering the process.

Integrations and automation depth

Drata offers around 120 integrations, placing it ahead of many Drata competitors. It covers major cloud providers, HRIS, and developer platforms. Automation spans roughly 70% of controls, though some evidence collection, especially people-based tasks, still requires manual work.

Delve connects to 100+ tools, covering the essentials but relying on manual uploads or workarounds for less common apps. Automation is shallower, covering about 50–60% of controls, which increases manual effort as the scope of compliance grows.

Verdict: Drata’s broader integration coverage and higher automation reduce manual work, while Delve’s setup is lighter but demands more manual intervention.

UI/UX

Drata has a polished, enterprise-grade dashboard that provides a clear view of control status, audit readiness, and evidence collection progress. Its clean design makes it easier for larger teams to coordinate across security, engineering, and HR.

Delve offers a more straightforward, minimal interface that is intuitive for smaller teams but lacks the advanced workflow features and scalability larger organizations may need.

Verdict: Drata wins on UI for teams that value an enterprise-ready, collaborative experience, while Delve’s lightweight design works fine for early-stage or lean setups.

Policy templates

Drata includes a sizable library of ready-to-use policy templates covering the most common compliance requirements. These templates serve as a strong baseline and can significantly reduce the upfront work needed to build documentation. However, they aren’t plug-and-play — organizations still need to adapt them to their unique processes, tools, and risk environment. The advantage is that teams start from a mature framework rather than building from scratch, which speeds up readiness.

Delve provides a smaller collection of templates, which means customers may need to invest more time creating policies and procedures on their own. While this gives more flexibility to tailor documentation from the ground up, it also adds overhead and slows down early compliance progress, especially for resource-constrained teams.

Verdict: Drata’s broader, pre-packaged template library is generally a stronger starting point, cutting down on initial drafting effort. Delve’s limited library leaves more work in the customer’s hands, making the documentation phase heavier and more time-consuming.

Onboarding and support

Drata’s onboarding typically takes 4–6 weeks, with guided support but an expectation that your team completes much of the setup. Drata provides support during US business hours, with response times averaging 1–2 business days. Drata also connects you to an auditor but does not directly manage that relationship, leaving coordination to your team.

Delve’s onboarding takes 4–8 weeks. Due to lighter automation and fewer integrations, the process requires more manual system connections and evidence preparation. Delve provides more limited support, leaning on self-service resources, with response times stretching to 2–3 business days.

Verdict: Drata generally delivers a faster, smoother onboarding experience and more responsive support compared to Delve.

Pricing and flexibility

Drata’s SMB plans range from $15K–$25K/year, with add-on costs for extra frameworks, integrations, or user seats. Its modular pricing allows you to scale features as needed, though costs can increase quickly.

Delve is priced between $12K–$20K/year, which is appealing for budget-conscious teams. However, the lower base price comes without built-in features like MDM, security training, or incident tracking, which can add significant third-party expenses.

Verdict: Delve has a lower entry price but can cost more when you factor in missing capabilities, while Drata’s modular approach offers more scalability for growing teams. Teams assessing Drata vs Delve reviews often weigh cost against feature depth, and the right choice depends on whether you prioritize upfront savings or long-term flexibility.

Feature	Drata	Delve
Frameworks supported	~20+ including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR	6 commonly used standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, etc
Integrations	200+ including major cloud, HRIS, dev tools	100+, covers basics like AWS, GitHub
Automation coverage	~70% controls automated	~50–60% controls automated
Built-in MDM	No	No
Policy templates	Auditor-approved library	Limited templates, more DIY
Support	US business hours, 1–2 day response	Limited hours, slower response
TCO efficiency	Medium — scales with add-ons	High — bundled audit costs, rapid deployment

Delve vs Drata: Where they shine

Choosing between Delve and Drata comes down to your team size, compliance scope, growth trajectory, and tolerance for manual work. Both can get you to certification, but their strengths and trade-offs are different.

Pick Delve if:

• You’re a small team (often founder-led) looking to achieve SOC 2 or ISO 27001 quickly without investing in heavy enterprise-grade workflows.
  
• You don’t need deep automation or a long list of integrations—your tech stack is simple enough to manage with a handful of core connections.
  
• Budget is the main decision driver, and you’re willing to absorb more manual compliance work to keep subscription costs lower.
  
• You value AI-assisted features like code scanning and automated trust report generation more than broad framework coverage or integration depth.
  
• You want 24/7 access to support via Slack/Zoom, even if the guidance is lighter-touch compared to dedicated compliance management.
  

Pick Drata if:

• You want stronger automation (continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection) and more integrations (38 listed vs Delve’s 12) to reduce manual work.
  
• You’re aiming for multi-framework compliance and not just SOC 2—and want the option to expand into HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and more without starting from scratch.
  
• Your compliance process involves multiple stakeholders (engineering, security, HR), and you need a polished, centralized dashboard to keep them aligned.
  
• You’re okay with business-hours support and don’t require around-the-clock availability.
  
• You accept a higher TCO in exchange for scalable, enterprise-grade infrastructure and a more mature product ecosystem.

Sprinto: Striking the perfect balance between Drata and Delve

Drata and Delve both solve important pieces of the compliance puzzle. Drata gives you credibility, breadth, and enterprise polish, while Delve pushes speed and AI-driven automation for leaner teams. But both come with trade-offs, whether it’s Drata’s higher costs and slower onboarding or Delve’s limited frameworks and heavier manual work.

Sprinto eliminates those trade-offs. With 30+ frameworks, 200+ integrations, and up to 99% automation, Sprinto gives you the scale of an enterprise platform without the usual complexity or overhead.

Here’s why Sprinto stands apart:

• Faster onboarding: Up to 80% quicker than traditional platforms.
  
• Global, expert-led support: 1–2 hour SLA response times.
  
• All-in-one platform: Bundles MDM, incident tracking, and security training at no extra cost.
  
• Lower TCO: Fewer hidden expenses and reduced manual work.
  
• Built to scale: Handles urgent SOC 2 needs for startups and multi-framework rollouts for growing companies.
  
• Growth-focused compliance: Adapts with your business, acting as both a compliance accelerator and a long-term partner.

Book your personalized demo today and see how Sprinto can take you from zero to audit-ready in weeks, not months, without the hidden costs of Drata or the manual overhead of Delve.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is based on independent research conducted by our team and on insights gathered from publicly available, user-first review platforms such as G2. We have summarized feedback to highlight commonly mentioned strengths and areas for improvement. While we strive for accuracy and balance, user experiences may vary, and we encourage readers to review the original sources for the most up-to-date feedback. This article was last updated in August 2025.

FAQs