FAQ
FAQ’s
What’s the difference between a SOC2 Type 1 and Type 2?

What’s the difference between a SOC2 Type 1 and Type 2?

The key difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and SOC 2 Type 2 is that while type 1 assesses the design of controls, type tests control effectiveness.

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls) is a compliance standard based on five trust criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, and privacy. The overarching aim of the SOC 2 report is to demonstrate that any company with the attestation aligns with the chosen trust principles and takes the sanctity of its client data seriously. SOC 2 reports are of two types—type 1 and type 2.

A SOC 2 Type 1 involves an auditor assessing whether an organization has the right controls in place, essentially auditing the organization’s systems and controls at a specific point in time. It is often used by companies seeking an initial baseline certification and planning to become fully SOC 2 compliant eventually. A Type 1 report provides a preliminary understanding of the criteria auditors will use to evaluate the controls in the Type 2 report.

SOC 2 Type 2, on the other hand, involves an auditor reviewing all of the security controls you’ve implemented to determine their effectiveness. It’s a more comprehensive audit that evaluates how those controls have been operating over a period, usually between 3 and 12 months. This observation period reviews whether the controls are functioning as intended, separate from the time it takes to set up these controls, which can take a few months. However, with Sprinto, you can be audit-ready in weeks.

Was this article helpful?

How can we improve this article?

Related questions

  • How is the HITRUST assessment process conducted?
  • What is HITRUST Compliance and Regulatory Mapping?
  • How do workflow checks work in Sprinto?
  • Does Sprinto help handle the Objection on CRM as a Critical System?
  • With respect to the services they should choose, do they need to have the combo of both EU and UK services or only EU services should be good? Context: They have opted for GDPR and not UK GDPR.
  • What is the difference between an EU Representative and a DPO? What is their requirement under GDPR?
  • Do companies need a lawyer to draft their agreements for GDPR?
  • Is having an EU/UK representative mandatory under GDPR?
  • Why don’t we cover all the TSCs?
  • Do we support HITRUST certification? What is the audit price?

Get SOC 2 compliance
ready in 4 weeks!

Sprinto: Your growth superpower

Use Sprinto to centralize security compliance management – so nothing
gets in the way of your moving up and winning big.