Sprinto vs Vanta vs Drata: Welche Compliance-Automatisierungsplattform sollten Sie wählen?
Wenn Ihr Team Sprinto, Vanta und Drata vergleicht, wählen Sie mehr als nur ein SOC-2-Tool. Sie entscheiden darüber, wie Ihr Team Audits, Kontrollen, Sicherheitsüberprüfungen, Lieferantenüberwachung und Risikotracking durchführt, sobald Compliance zu einer kontinuierlichen Aufgabe und nicht mehr zu einem einmaligen Projekt wird. Meine Einschätzung ist klar: Vanta ist nach wie vor die einfachste und schnellste Standardlösung, Drata ist am stärksten, wenn Sie eine strukturiertere Audit- und Assurance-Engine benötigen, und Sprinto ist die beste Wahl, wenn Sie kontinuierliche Compliance, Risikomanagement, Lieferantenüberwachung, Vertrauensfragebögen und KI-Governance als ein zusammenhängendes Programm integrieren möchten.
TL; DR
Schnellen Schnappschuss
|
Eigenschaften |
Sprint |
Vanta |
Drata |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Am besten geeignet, |
✅ Skalierung von SaaS- und mittelständischen Teams |
✅ Startups und schlanke Teams werden schnell auditbereit |
✅ Sicherheits- und GRC-geführte Teams entwickeln strukturierte Programme |
|
Frameworks |
✅ 200+ |
⚠️ 35+ |
⚠️ 25+ |
|
Integrationen |
✅ 300+ |
✅ 300+ |
✅ 300+ |
|
KI-Fähigkeiten |
✅ KI-Spielplatz, KI fragen, Problemlösungsagent |
✅ Vanta KI-Agent |
✅ Drata AI, AIQA, Agentic TPRM |
|
Kontinuierliche Überwachung |
✅ ja |
✅ ja |
✅ ja |
|
Risikomanagement |
✅ Live-Punktewertung mit Steuerungsfunktion |
⚠️ Anpassbar, aber leichter |
✅ Structured IRM |
|
Lieferantenrisiko |
✅ Autonome TPRM-Workflows |
⚠️ Stark, aber einige Spieltiefe basiert auf Zusatzinhalten |
✅ Strong TPRM depth |
|
Richtlinienverwaltung |
✅ Einheitliche Verpflichtungen und verknüpfte Kontrollen |
⚠️ Vorlagenbasiert und geführt |
✅ Policy Center with approvals and mapping |
|
Audit-Unterstützung |
✅ Stets verfügbare Beweise und Zusammenarbeit |
⚠️ Stark, aber eher auf Selbstbedienung ausgelegt |
✅ Audit Hub and strong collaboration |
|
AnzeigenPreise |
⚠️ Individuelles Angebot |
⚠️ Individuelles Angebot |
⚠️ Individuelles Angebot |
|
G2-Bewertung |
|||
|
Gesamtpassform |
✅ Ideal für langfristige Treuhandgeschäfte |
✅ Ideal für einen schnellen Einstieg |
✅ Best for structured technical execution |
Was ist Sprint
Sprinto is an Autonomous Trust Platform that brings continuous compliance, risk management, vendor oversight, trust questionnaires, unified commitments, audits, and AI governance into one connected system. To put it simply, it is built for teams that do not want compliance, vendor reviews, risk tracking, and AI governance scattered across separate tools and recurring manual work.
Hauptstärken von Sprinto
Risikomanagement: Sprinto keeps risk tied to live controls, checks, assets, vendors, and owners, so scores and heatmaps move when reality changes.
Fragebögen zu Vertrauen und Sicherheit: It uses verified posture and AI-assisted workflows to help teams answer security questionnaires and RFPs faster.
Gemeinsame Verpflichtungen: Sprinto brings contracts, regulations, standards, and policies into one system, then links them to controls and evidence so work can be reused instead of recreated.
Kontinuierliche Compliance: Sprinto continuously monitors controls, detects anomalies, triggers remediation, and keeps audit-grade evidence current.
Autonomes TPRM: Sprinto discovers vendors, automates assessments, uses AI for due diligence, and keeps risk current as vendor exposure changes.
Autonome KI-Governance: Sprinto vereint KI-Risikoregister, Lebenszyklusüberwachung, Lieferantenprüfung und Richtliniendurchsetzung in einer einzigen Betriebsebene für die KI-Governance.
I would put Sprinto first for teams that expect compliance to widen into a broader trust program. If you want continuous compliance, live risk, trust questionnaires, vendor oversight, and AI governance in one place, Sprinto feels like the most complete long-term system here. The review signal supports that too: G2 users consistently praise Sprinto for ease of use, support, automation, and continuous monitoring.
Was ist Vanta
Vanta is an agentic trust platform built to help teams automate compliance, manage risk, and prove trust continuously. It still feels like the most familiar option in this category, especially for startups and lean teams that want to get audit-ready quickly with broad integrations and guided workflows.
Hauptstärken von Vanta
300+ integrations and 1,400+ automated tests: Vanta brings one of the largest native integration libraries in this comparison.
Vanta AI Agent: Vanta’s AI Agent drafts policies, completes questionnaires, flags issues, verifies evidence, and monitors vendor risk signals.
Questionnaire Automation and Trust Center: Vanta pairs AI-assisted questionnaire handling with a customer-facing Trust Center that helps shorten security reviews.
Arbeitsbereiche: Vanta Workspaces ermöglicht es größeren Organisationen, mehrere Geschäftsbereiche zu segmentieren und gleichzeitig den Gesamtüberblick über die Organisation zu behalten.
Risiko- und TPRM-Workflows: Vanta supports customizable risk scenarios, multi-step approvals, snapshot sharing, vendor assessments, and continuous vendor monitoring, though some TPRM depth sits behind add-ons.
Startups and lean teams. I’d choose Vanta when your priority is speed, familiarity, and breadth. It’s especially strong for a lean team that wants integrations, automation, and a visible AI copilot without buying something that feels overly process-heavy on day one, or when you just want a straightforward path to audit-readiness. Across G2-Bewertungen, a few recurring themes emerge: pricing that scales with headcount and integrations, integrations that sometimes break or run shallow, and deeper TPRM and advanced features locked behind upgrades or add-ons.
Was ist Drata
Drata is an AI-native compliance automation and agentic trust management platform built around continuous compliance, integrated risk management, and customer assurance. Compared with Vanta, it feels more structured and governance-heavy. Compared with Sprinto, it feels more packaged around formal GRC and assurance workflows.
Hauptstärken von Drata
300+ integrated tools: Drata automates evidence collection and monitoring across a broad integration base.
Audit Hub: Drata’s Audit Hub centralizes evidence, requests, sampling, auditor collaboration, and now internal audits in the same workflow.
Integriertes Risikomanagement: Drata brings internal and third-party risk into one system with owners, evidence, and real-time visibility.
Policy Center: Drata’s Policy Center supports uploads, reviews, approvals, publishing, version tracking, and AI-powered policy-to-control mapping.
Agentic TPRM and AI questionnaire workflows: Drata now leans hard into Agentic TPRM, AI Questionnaire Assistance, AI Vendor SOC 2 Summaries, and AI-assisted test generation.
I would put Drata near the top for security-led or GRC-led teams that want more structure around audits, policy management, risk, and vendor programs. Review patterns support that reputation: users praise Drata’s support, automation, and audit readiness, while recurring complaints focus on integration limits, pricing, and some UI or workflow clarity issues.
Detailliert Vergleich
All three tools can help you get compliant. The real difference is what happens after the first audit: how much manual coordination is still left, how well the platform scales across frameworks, and whether risk, vendor reviews, and trust operations stay connected or break into separate workstreams.
1. Kernprinzipien der Plattform
Hier beginnen sich die Produkte grundlegend zu unterscheiden.
Sprinto feels like the most connected system of the three. It is built around unified commitments, continuous compliance, risk management, vendor oversight, trust questionnaires, and AI governance, all running together rather than as separate modules. That connectedness is the strongest reason to buy it.
Vanta still feels like the category default: broad integrations, continuous compliance, strong trust-proof workflows, and an AI Agent layered into everyday GRC work. It is broader than it used to be, but simplicity and coverage are still the core of the product.
Drata feels most like a structured trust-management system for organizations that already think in terms of audit workflows, risk ownership, policy governance, and assurance. It is less lightweight, but more deliberate.
2. Einarbeitung und Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Hier entscheiden die Teams sehr schnell, ob sich das Produkt als Hebelwirkung oder als zusätzliche Belastung anfühlt.
Sprinto’s review signal is strongest on ease of use, proactive support, and guided execution. My read is that it does a good job of giving teams structure without making the product feel too rigid.
Vanta is still easy to get into. Reviews repeatedly praise usability and integrations, but cost, some dashboard overwhelm, and limitations in less-standard environments come up often enough that I would not call it frictionless for everyone.
Drata also reviews well for usability and support. It usually feels more approachable than its reputation suggests, but it is still more process-driven than Vanta, and users do call out some integration and clarity issues.
3. Automatisierung und Beweismittelhandhabung
Dies ist nach wie vor der Schwerpunkt der Kategorie.
Sprinto’s automation story is strongest around continuous accuracy. It keeps evidence current as systems change, uses AI to accelerate questionnaires and due diligence, and keeps policy-control alignment closer to reality.
Vanta has the broadest straightforward automation pitch: 300+ integrations, 1,400+ automated tests, continuous monitoring, AI evidence review, and guided audits. If your question is, “How much can the platform automate out of the box?” Vanta still has the strongest simple answer.
Drata is strong here, too. With 300+ integrated tools, centralized evidence collection, and expanded infrastructure testing, it is a robust automation platform, but the automation sits within a more structured governance workflow.
4. Risiko- und Kontrollmanagement
Dies ist einer der deutlichsten Trennpunkte.
Sprinto’s risk module is built around live scoring and control linkage. Risks remain tied to assets, controls, vendors, and checks, which makes the module feel operational rather than spreadsheet-like.
Vanta’s risk product is more capable than many buyers assume. It supports customizable scenarios, approvals, snapshots, and multiple registers. I still see it as a strong supporting capability, not the main reason to buy Vanta.
Drata has the most formal risk structure after Sprinto, especially if your team wants internal and third-party risk managed in a shared operating model. Some configuration depth still depends on which risk package you buy.
5. Framework-Abdeckung und Skalierbarkeit
Dies ist relevant, sobald Ihr Programm nicht mehr nur „SOC 2“ ist.
Sprinto has the clearest breadth advantage with 200+ frameworks, 300+ integrations, and Unified Commitments tying requirements to controls and evidence. If your trust workload is going to expand, Sprinto gives you the most headroom.
Vanta supports 35+ frameworks and has Workspaces for multiple business units. For a lot of teams, that is enough. It is just a smaller breadth story than Sprinto’s.
Drata supports 25+ frameworks and scales well into multi-framework, multi-workspace environments, but it leans more heavily on structured configuration and plan depth.
6. Berichterstattung, Transparenz und Auditbereitschaft
Hier erlebt Ihr Team das Produkt während der Audit-Saison hautnah.
Sprinto is strongest when you want to stay audit-ready all year. It keeps evidence current, continuously tracks control health, and provides teams with a centralized audit workflow instead of a recurring scramble.
Vanta gives you strong ongoing visibility, an auditor portal, and a customer-facing trust layer through Trust Center. It works well, but it is still more self-serve than Drata’s audit motion.
Drata is strongest here. Audit Hub centralizes evidence, requests, comments, samples, and collaboration in one place, and internal audits now run in the same workflow.
7. KI-Fähigkeiten
Alle drei Anbieter sprechen mittlerweile über KI. Die entscheidende Frage ist, wie die KI Ihrem Team konkret hilft.
Sprinto’s AI is spread across the workflow: AI Playground lets teams build AI actions inside the product, Ask AI works contextually inside records, and Fix-It Agent helps resolve common misconfigurations. On top of that, Sprinto’s AI layer supports questionnaire work, vendor analysis, policy alignment, and always-ready evidence. That feels operational, not cosmetic.
Vanta has the clearest single-agent story. The AI Agent drafts policies, completes questionnaires, flags issues, verifies evidence, suggests fixes, and monitors vendor risk signals. If your team wants one visible AI copilot for daily trust work, Vanta is very easy to understand and sell internally.
Drata’s AI is strongest in assurance and TPRM. AI Questionnaire Assistance, Agentic TPRM Assessment, AI Vendor SOC 2 Summaries, AI-assisted policy mapping, and AI-generated test expansion make sense for teams with more structured vendor and audit programs.
Pros & Cons
SPRINTO
Vorteile
Nachteile
Vanta
Vorteile
Nachteile
Drata
Vorteile
Nachteile
Welches solltest du wählen?
Wählen Sprinto if
Wählen Vanta wenn
Wählen Drata wenn
abschließendes Urteil
Der Gewinner ist…Häufig gestellte Fragen
Die beste Wahl für Startups, die suchen ISO 27001
Hier ein genauerer Blick darauf, wie Sprinto und Vanta in Bezug auf wichtige Compliance-Dimensionen im Vergleich abschneiden.
Schnellster Zertifizierungsprozess
Smartly hilft Startups dabei, sich in 15 bis 30 Tagen, nicht Monaten, zertifizieren zu lassen.
All-Inclusive-Preise
Sie zahlen einen Festpreis für die Zertifizierung, nicht für jede einzelne Dienstleistung auf dem Weg dorthin.
Ideal für kleine Budgets
Zugeschnitten auf junge Startups, die ISO 27001 als Wachstumsbeschleuniger benötigen
End-to-End-Anleitung
Smartly arbeitet direkt mit Wirtschaftsprüfern zusammen und automatisiert 70 % der manuellen Vorbereitungsarbeiten.
